Baby steps…
by Gaius Publius
Slowly but surely, the courts are dealing with the militarized police state. ArsTechnica:
Divided federal appeals court rules you have the right to film the police
Filming cops, 2-1 court rules, ensures that they “are not abusing their power.”
A divided federal appeals court is ruling for the First Amendment, saying the public has a right to film the police. But the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding the bulk of a lower court’s decision against an activist who was conducting what he called a “First Amendment audit” outside a Texas police station, noted that this right is not absolute and is not applicable everywhere.
The facts of the dispute are simple. Phillip Turner was 25 in September 2015 when he decided to go outside the Fort Worth police department to test officers’ knowledge of the right to film the police. While filming, he was arrested for failing to identify himself to the police. Officers handcuffed and briefly held Turner before releasing him without charges. Turner sued, alleging violations of his Fourth Amendment right against unlawful arrest and detention and his First Amendment right of speech.
The 2-1 decision Thursday by Judge Jacques Wiener is among a slew of rulings on the topic, and it provides fresh legal backing for the so-called YouTube society where people are constantly using their mobile phones to film themselves and the police. The American Civil Liberties Union says, “there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs or video in public places and harassing, detaining and arresting those who fail to comply.”
Just in time for certain-to-appear spring and summer conflicts in Beauregard Sessions’ America.
Be carefully, though, as you wield those dangerous digital lenses. There’s a lot of yes-but in the article, including this one:
The Supreme Court still has not ruled on the issue.
Hmm.
GP
.