This is how a free press dies in the 21st century
by digby
Not with a bang but a buy-out:
Hungary’s leading news website, Origo, had a juicy scoop: A top aide to the far-right prime minister, Viktor Orban, had used state money to pay for sizable but unexplained expenses during secret foreign trips. The story embarrassed Mr. Orban and was a reminder that his country still had an independent press.
But that was in 2014. Today, Origo is one of the prime minister’s most dutiful media boosters, parroting his attacks on migrants and on George Soros, the Hungarian-American philanthropist demonized by the far right on both sides of the Atlantic.
And if Origo once dug into Mr. Orban’s government, it now pounces on his political opponents.
“Let’s look at the affairs of Laszlo Botka!” a headline blared this month in a salacious take on the only mayor of a major Hungarian city not aligned with Mr. Orban’s party, Fidesz. “Serious scandals, mysteries surround the socialist mayor of Szeged.”
If little known outside Hungary, Origo is now a cautionary tale for an age in which democratic norms and freedom of expression are being challenged globally — and President Trump and other leaders have intensified attacks on the free press.
In many ways, Hungary has foreshadowed the democratic backsliding now evident in different corners of the world. Since winning power in 2010, Mr. Orban has steadily eroded institutional checks and balances, especially the independent media. His government now oversees state-owned news outlets, while his allies control most of the country’s private media sources, creating a virtual echo chamber for Mr. Orban’s far right, anti-immigrant views.
The story of Origo’s transformation from independent news source to government cheerleader offers a blueprint of how Mr. Orban and his allies pulled this off. Rather than a sudden and blatant power grab, the effort was subtle but determined, using a quiet pressure campaign.
Origo’s editors were never imprisoned and its reporters were never beaten up. But in secret meetings — including a pivotal one in Vienna — the website’s original owner, a German-owned telecommunications company, relented. The company, Magyar Telekom, first tried self-censorship. Then it sought a nonpartisan buyer.
But, ultimately, Origo went to the family of Mr. Orban’s former finance minister.
“When Orban came to power in 2010, his aim was to eliminate the media’s role as a check on government,” said Attila Mong, a former public radio anchor and a critic of Mr. Orban. “Orban wanted to introduce a regime which keeps the facade of democratic institutions but is not operated in a democratic manner — and a free press doesn’t fit into that picture.”
I don’t know about you but the statement by ATT CEO Randall Stephenson, (which now owns CNN) didn’t exactly sound like a ringing endorsement of press freedom when he commented on the Jim Acosta flap:
“If the White House wants to pull someone’s press credentials, there is a process. That process must be followed, otherwise what is the criteria for pulling somebody’s press credentials?”
“You didn’t like the line of questioning? Well, that kind of seems to be violative of our protections of freedom of the press. If the president doesn’t like his conduct in the press briefing room then there’s a process to articulate that he doesn’t like it. There has been no process followed.”
I guess if Trump had followed “the process” then it would have been fine?
I dunno. Media in this country is held by a few mega-corporations. We’ve seen plenty of pressure from that quarter over the years. And political pressure too. Recall that CBS crawled on its hands and knees to the Bush White House after the National Guard flap.
It’s certainly possible that under the right circumstances the same thing could happen here.
.