Skip to content

Month: December 2018

Let the games begin

Let the games begin

by digby

I stay out of Democratic presidential primaries as much as possible and I’m hoping to continue that habit this year as well. But I’m thrilled that such a quality field is developing and I look forward to seeing how it all shakes out. Obviously, beating Donald Trump is job one, but I don’t have a clue what the winning formula is at the moment so I think a good primary battle will make that a bit more clear.

Anyway, Senator Elizabeth Warren announced her candidacy today and I’m very happy to see her in there. She has tremendous political talent, in particular a way of speaking that conveys economic issues in terms that average people can relate to. I’ve been a fan for a very long time, ever since I got to hear her address a small meeting of a few of us at Netroots Nation back in 2010. I remember that someone asked her at the end of it if she would run for president and she flashed a rueful little smile and ducked out of the room. I always figured that if the stars aligned that meant “yes.”

Anyway, here’s her announcement video. Let the games begin:

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

QOTD: Walter Jones, R-NC

QOTD: Walter Jones, R-NC

by digby

“If Mexico isn’t going to be made to pay for a wall, that means funds must be found internally. As a wealthy man, the president might consider pledging some of his own funds as well [to help build the wall. ]Whatever it takes, just so long as we don’t add to the debt that is bankrupting our great country.”

He’s quite a card. As if Trump would ever pay for anything out of his own pocket. He’s even got the taxpayers picking up part of the tab for the party down in Mar-a-lago tonight — a party he isn’t even attending but which will be putting money in his own pocket from all the rich bigwigs who paid top dollar to attend.  He stole money from his “charity.” The man is the most hardcore skinflint in the world, at least partly because he lives on debt and graft and has very little money of his own.

But it’s a cute idea. Haha.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

The greatest negotiator the world has ever known

The greatest negotiator the world has ever known

by digby

He willingly hung that mantle around his neck. The Democrats must set it afire.

In a series of tweets Monday morning, President Donald Trump demanded that Democratic leaders return to Washington, D.C. to reach a border security deal, just days after GOP leadership sent Congress home without finalizing the bipartisan bill to avert a partial government shutdown of the president’s own making.

“I campaigned on Border Security,” Trump tweeted, “which you cannot have without a strong and powerful Wall … Dems should get back here an (sic) fix now!”

Prior to the shutdown, Trump boasted that he would be “proud to shut down the government for border security,” telling Democratic leaders, “I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down — I’m not going to blame you for it.”

Although they controlled both chambers of Congress for nearly two years, Republican lawmakers have been unable to deliver on Trump’s demands of $5 billion in funding for a border war along the U.S.-Mexico border, one that the president vowed Mexico would fund. GOP leaders in the House and Senate, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI), have been largely absent over the past week and, according to the Washington Post, Republicans haven’t organized meetings to develop a strategy to defend the president.

GOP lawmakers have attempted over the past year to rebrand the wall as a “security fence,” in an apparent effort to make the the structure more palatable to Democrats. On Sunday, after a meeting with the president, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told reporters that the “wall has become a metaphor for border security” and that Republican lawmakers are merely pushing for a “physical barrier” that “makes sense.”

Democratic leaders have said they support more than $1 billion in border security funding, but that they do not want any of the money to go toward building a wall.

His enablers, like Lindsey Graham, are trying to change the terms of the debate, calling the wall a “metaphor” but Trump isn’t having it, and neither are the right wing radio and TV hosts who have him by the … fingers:

He’s wearing it. Let him smother himself in it.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

Back to the Republican future

Back to the Republican future

by digby

This is just the beginning if they have their way. It’s the kind of thing that used to happen every day, in every state, before the ACA. They are intent upon showing us all just how cruel they can be.

Arkansas is throwing thousands of people off its Medicaid rolls each month for not complying with work requirements, blindsiding vulnerable residents panicked about losing their health coverage.

Views differ on the fairness of the unprecedented social experiment, but there’s unanimity here that it’s causing confusion. And that’s feeding a philosophical debate about whether low-income adults are ducking the work rules or just can’t navigate the tech-heavy reporting system that goes offline every night at 9 p.m.

Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson defended the program, saying it provides the help residents need to become independent. “These are not people that didn’t want to work,” he said in an interview. “It’s just they might not have had the training they needed, or they didn’t have a job opportunity and they needed additional assistance. And that’s what the objective is of the program.”

The state has removed more than 16,000 low-income adults for failing to log at least 80 hours of work, job training, volunteering or similar activity — including 4,655 in November.

Some of the people thrown off the program describe a nightmarish, confusing experience with clunky technology and no one to help them. Individuals who don’t adhere to the new rules for three months get removed from Medicaid for the rest of the year.

“I have pre-existing conditions. But all they could tell me was, ‘Sorry, you didn’t comply,’” said Jamie Deyo, who lost coverage and suffers from rheumatoid arthritis and back problems stemming from a 2013 car accident. “It just was a slap in the face.”

Deyo is one of nine Arkansas Medicaid enrollees who sued the Trump administration in August to block the rules. She said a state letter notifying her about the work requirements was sent to the wrong address, leaving her completely unaware of the new terms. After losing coverage, the 38-year-old was unable to go to physical therapy or see her doctor to schedule surgery to repair a broken screw in her back. She’s also had to pay more for medication.

“A lot of people don’t realize how bad I hurt,” she said. “I can’t stand up a lot. If I could work, I would.”

The Trump administration is using work rules to cut enrollment in the safety net program after the Affordable Care Act expanded it to millions of able-bodied low-income adults. Arkansas — which imposed rules in June on certain enrollees age 30 to 49 and plans to expand them in January to those age 19 to 29 — provides the first real-time results of the GOP’s push to reshape the entitlement.

The Trump administration has approved similar rules in Indiana, Kentucky, New Hampshire and Wisconsin, but they haven’t taken effect yet; Kentucky’s have been stalled by a lawsuit from advocates for the poor.

Arkansas officials are belatedly making accommodations for people in a poor state with limited internet access after national backlash from health care advocates, including a new phone line for enrollees to report their hours.

Online reporting kiosks have also been available at county offices. But the state has not hired additional workers to help Medicaid enrollees navigate the new rules, despite the high stakes for non-compliance.

Only 1,428 low-income adults required to report their hours in November logged at least 80 hours. Roughly 8,400 failed to report 80 hours, with 98 percent of them not reporting any work activities, according to statistics from the Arkansas Department of Human Services.

Arkansas’ Medicaid experiment has drawn ire from Democrats across the country as well as from a panel of Medicaid experts that advises Congress, which in November asked Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to stop the state from dropping people until outreach efforts are improved.

Racheal Holmes said she lost her benefits at the end of October despite going to a Department of Human Services office in Little Rock once a month to log her hours.

Holmes, who had been working at a grocery store, said it took hours just to log in to the online reporting system the first time. A state worker offered help only after a security guard noticed she was still at the office after several hours, she said.

“You couldn’t get basic assistance, as though it’s a way for you to fail,” said Holmes, who is currently unemployed and has been unable to afford medication to treat high blood pressure since her coverage lapsed. She doesn’t think the work requirements are unfair but asks, “Where’s the assistance?”

Arkansas officials point to what they describe as promising signs the requirements are working but haven’t finalized plans to see whether the project is achieving its goals of helping individuals find work and improving their health.

More than 3,800 Medicaid enrollees who were subject to the work rules have found jobs since June, although it’s unclear how many of them were motivated specifically by the new requirements.

Hutchinson scoffed at critics who say the state isn’t doing enough, citing examples such as the Department of Human Services making more than 155,000 phone calls to educate enrollees about the rules. The state is also planning a new advertising campaign.

“You could show that it was 100 percent successful in every way and they would still criticize it, because they don’t believe that any responsibility should have to accompany a social benefit such as Medicaid,” Hutchinson said. “The criticism is based upon myths and misunderstandings and a totally different philosophy.”

Hutchinson fought with legislators in his own party to continue the Medicaid expansion his Democratic predecessor began under Obamacare, which now covers more than 230,000 people. The governor maintains that the work requirements are a needed conservative counterweight to the health law’s coverage expansion in a red state where there’s little desire to enlarge the social safety net.

A supermajority of three-fourths of the Arkansas House and Senate is required to approve funding for Medicaid expansion each year, leading to almost annual cliffhanger votes.

Hutchinson’s push to institute conservative changes has given Democrats and advocates for the poor heartburn, with critics arguing Medicaid was never intended to be a jobs program. Conservatives disagree.

“It is reasonable and expected in the United States of America and especially here in conservative Arkansas that people who are able to work will do so,” said state Sen. Jason Rapert. “It is not acceptable for people to think they are entitled for other taxpayers to pay for services for them just because they do not want to work. That is not individual responsibility.”

In an interview earlier this month, Rapert said he hadn’t heard a single complaint from constituents subject to the work requirements.

But residents tell other stories. Casey Copeland, a 37-year-old who struggled with depression and drug addiction following the death of his father, said he’s able to comply with the rules only by volunteering in the community and relying on financial support from his family.

“If my mom didn’t support me on the financial stuff, I couldn’t do all of it,” he said in an interview at Canvas Community Church in Little Rock, which holds a weekly dinner-and-a-movie gathering for the homeless.

Copeland was able to report his hours online using a computer at home but said the process was “very confusing.”

Department of Human Services Director Cindy Gillespie said officials are looking at the program “continuously” to see how it can be improved for enrollees.

“We’re trying to help them get to a lot of the things that exist in this state,” she said. “We’re trying not to really be fixated on what everybody else is saying outside Arkansas about the program.”

That’s not much consolation for Deyo, who’s figuring out how to deal with her infirmities in the new landscape.

“I have the doctors‘ notes that say I can’t work; I have their signatures,” she said. “Nobody wanted to hear that from me.”

Making sick people work in order to get health care is right up there with the most dissonant policies they’ve ever came up with. It makes even less sense than usual.

Look for them to start saying people need to work to get social security and Medicare as well. After all, just because they’re old doesn’t mean people shouldn’t “take responsibility” for their retirement and health care, amirite?

I wish I could understand what it is about sick people getting health care that makes these people so angry that they lose their humanity.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

The worst of Donald Trump

The worst of Donald Trump

by digby

There’s just so much. So very much:

I don’t know about you but I’m pretty sure I aged at least a decade in 2018. This accelerated political news cycle in the Trump era has the effect of making every day feel like a week and every month feel like a year. With all the chaos and perpetual motion, it would be easy to simply dismiss the whole thing as one big mess. But it isn’t. It’s all bad, but some things are much worse than others. And yes, the president of the United States is responsible for all of them. Nobody else even comes close.

Trump hurled some personal insults this year that were truly obnoxious, even for him. He called adult film actress Stormy Daniels “Horseface.” He said dozens of times in his rallies and his twitter feed that Rep. Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, is “low IQ” (while at the same time declaring himself a “very stable genius”). He called his former staffer Omarosa Manigault Newman “that dog” and cruelly mocked Dr. Christine Blasey Ford for her testimony during Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination hearing. He tweeted, “Lebron James was just interviewed by the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon. He made Lebron look smart, which isn’t easy to do. I like Mike!”

Members of his own administration weren’t spared, including former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who Trump tweeted was “dumb as a rock” and didn’t have the “mental capacity” for the job. We can assume that 2019 will bring similar tweets about soon-to-be-former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, whose resignation letter angered Trump greatly once the pundits on TV explained to him what it meant. His insults toward former members of the intelligence community are too many to list, but one of the big low points of the year was his impulsive decision to pull the security clearances of former CIA director John Brennan in a fit of pique.

It goes without saying that Trump has spent most of the year decrying Robert Mueller’s investigation and making wild accusations against anyone and everyone he believes threatens him. (He often simply tweets “Witch Hunt!” as a sort of primal scream into the void.) Nothing threatens him more than the media, which he calls the “enemy of the people.” This is an ongoing low point for the presidency — no single comment or tweet stands out. His Twitter freak flag flies on a daily basis, every day bringing a fresh outrage.

But there have been some specific low points in 2018 that merit acknowledgment for their seriousness. Trump’s infantile rhetoric is one thing. Perhaps the republic will be able to restore some semblance of maturity and decency to the office once he’s gone. But his policy decisions and behavior on the world stage are something else.

Trump hit the ground running in January with a series of belligerent tweets taunting the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong-un. The most memorable would be the one in which he wrote, “please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!” The president later cast aside all normal protocol and met with Kim in an elaborately staged but substance-free meeting in Singapore which Trump later described as the moment he and the murderous dictator “fell in love.”

This qualifies as a low point for a number of reasons. Despite the fact that Trump’s bizarre approach to diplomacy, more or less by accident, temporarily ratcheted down the tensions he had ratcheted up, he showed the world that he’s a sap. If that only embarrassed the U.S., that would be one thing. Americans can take it. But the consequences could be a lot more severe if other ambitious leaders with a little more savvy decide to push the envelope.

That brings us to another low point: Trump’s “summit” with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki. Remember: That came on the heels of him making an utter ass of himself, first at the G8 meeting in Canada and then the NATO meeting in Europe, where he went out of his way to insult every one of America’s allies and even showed up late to meet the Queen of England. It was a performance that made the Singapore pageant looks downright stately by comparison.

It was clear Trump was champing at the bit to get to his big meeting with Putin. The two leaders met in private in an unrecorded session for two hours and then emerged for a press conference in which Trump behaved as if he were the Russian president’s majordomo. In one of the most memorable moments of his presidency thus far, he made it clear that he did not believe his own intelligence community was more credible than the Russian leader, even saying at one point he didn’t see any reason why the Russians would have tried to sabotage his rival in the 2016 election. (He later fatuously asserted that he’d really meant to say that he didn’t see why they wouldn’t, which made no sense at all.)

That press conference was a turning point for a lot of people, I think. Trump’s performance was so outrageously weak and sycophantic it became hard to deny that something was extremely awry in that relationship. Putin seemed very pleased, however.

All those things and many others too numerous to list are low points of 2018. In fact the whole year is a low point. But to my mind nothing is lower than the fact that Donald Trump believes that separating children, even infants, from their parents at the U.S. border — putting the kids in cages and then losing track of hundreds of them as their parents were deported — was a justifiable “deterrent.” Trump reportedly calls their nations “shithole countries” and threatens their leaders with a cutoff of aid if they don’t somehow keep their citizens from seeking refuge in the U.S. (Does he want them to build a wall to keep their people in?)

Trump has created a crisis where none existed — illegal immigration and asylum claims are quite low by historical standards — out of bigotry and rank political opportunism. His administration has changed the rules and procedures, forcing people to take more and more dangerous risks. And now children are dying. Two kids under age 10 have died in government custody under dubious conditions in the past month.

This is what the president of the United States had to say about that:

It is the very end of 2018. The government is shut down over Trump’s demand for a wall at the border, while refugee children die in our government’s custody. Our president does not show even a scintilla of empathy or take any responsibility. That’s low, even for him. I hesitate to think what 2019 is going to bring.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

No time left for you, 2018 by @BloggersRUs

No time left for you, 2018
by Tom Sullivan


2019 minimum wage increases by state, via National Employment Law Project/USA Today.

Yes, it’s time for year-in-reviews, but there is too much to do in the year ahead to bother right now. The New York Times Editorial Board this morning summarizes what Democrats have in store beginning later this week: Reform.

“Americans are fed up with feeling that the system is rigged against them — to coin a phrase — and itching for leaders who will unrig it,” the Times proclaims:

Enter H.R. 1, a comprehensive package of revisions to current political practice that House Democrats are looking to introduce in the opening weeks of the next Congress. While the details are still being hashed out, H.R. 1 will attempt to: establish nationwide automatic voter registration; promote early and online voting; end partisan gerrymandering; expand conflict-of-interest laws; increase oversight of lobbyists; require the disclosure of presidential tax returns; strengthen disclosure of campaign donations; set up a system of small-donor matching funds for congressional candidates; and revive the moribund matching-fund system for presidential campaigns. A plan for repairing the Voting Rights Act will move along a separate track.

I can see the states’ rights lawsuits filed to stop Washington from preventing gerrymandering and automatic voter registration now. Except the sitting president is still named Trump and Republicans still control the U.S. Senate, as the Board acknowledges:

One reason H.R. 1 can be so big and bold is that it is mostly an expression of what Democrats would like to do rather than what has any real shot at moving through this divided government. Even staunch fans of the measure expect the Republican majority leader, Mitch McConnell, to jam it up in the Senate. The phlegmatic Mr. McConnell may not get worked up about much, but over the years he has consistently displayed a fierce passion for strangling anything resembling campaign finance reform.

Not to mention his party’s general aversion to expanding access to voting. The H.R. 1 package may be more of a “medium- to longish-term legislative goal” for Democrats, but passage in a House led once again by Nancy Pelosi would be a declaration, even if it stalls in the Senate, that when it comes to “draining the swamp,” Democrats are more than just talk (at least in the House). So far, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act (S.3357) has no co-sponsors.

The public may have an unprecedented, bipartisan appetite for campaign finance reform, but reform that puts more in people’s stomachs will do more to reduce their appetite for white-nationalist sideshows.

Unrigging the system means people living paycheck to paycheck get someone attending to their needs, and that’s happening, if slowly. Workers in over 20 states and 38 cities will see their paychecks increase with minimum wage hikes in 2019, according to the National Employment Law Project, reports USA Today:

In introducing her Accountable Capitalism Act last August, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts wrote:

There’s a fundamental problem with our economy. For decades, American workers have helped create record corporate profits but have seen their wages hardly budge. To fix this problem we need to end the harmful corporate obsession with maximizing shareholder returns at all costs, which has sucked trillions of dollars away from workers and necessary long-term investments.

All well and good. Addressing political and corporate corruption could be a full-time undertaking in 2019. Somehow and against opposition, lawmakers still need to fix America’s teetering health care system and make immediate and urgent progress on curbing climate change before there is no time left.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

Newt was worried about systematically undermining the Constitution

Newt was worried about systematically undermining the Constitution

by digby

Once upon a time :

That was back in 1998. Today, he’s singing a different tune:

“This whole thing is an absurdity. We’ve now had Paul Manafort and his wife in their pajamas at 3 in the morning having the FBI break down the door. Cohen, the lawyer, had the door taken off of the hinges at 6 in the morning. It ain’t the rule of law when they kick in your door at 3 in the morning and you’re faced with armed men. And you have had no reason to be told you’re going to have that kind of treatment.

That’s Stalin. That’s the Gestapo in Germany. That shouldn’t be the American FBI.”

I’m sure you’re shocked to see that Newt Gingrich is a total hypocrite and political hack. He seemed so sincere.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

City Mice vs Country Mice

City Mice vs Country Mice

by digby

I don’t think this is a new story. The rural and urban folks have always had a different worldview. It’s true in other countries as well. Look at what’s happened recently in France.

Our system of government was, unfortunately, designed to give an unfair advantage to the rural population in an age when farming was a much more common livelihood than it is today. Now, it just favors Big Ag and a minority of voters in a way that is distorting our politics:

The 2018 midterm election confirmed America’s urban-rural divide; Democrats excelled in cities, Republicans dominated in the country and the suburbs were the tiebreaker that handed Democrats the House. Will the 2020 election play out the same way? This week, we got two polls of President Trump’s approval rating that suggest it might.

First, a Selzer & Co. (one of our favorite pollsters) national poll conducted Nov. 24-27 for Grinnell College found that Trump had a 43 percent approval rating and a 45 percent disapproval rating among all adults. However, his support isn’t distributed equally across different types of communities. He’s enormously popular among residents of rural areas, with a 61 percent approval rating and a 26 percent disapproval rating. In small towns, that breakdown is 44 percent approve vs. 42 percent disapprove. But in suburban areas, only 41 percent of residents approve of the job that Trump is doing as president, while 50 percent disapprove. Trump’s approval rating is lowest among urbanites — 31 percent approve of him while 59 percent disapprove.

We saw similar geographic trends in an Investor’s Business Daily/TIPP poll that was conducted from Nov. 26 to Dec. 2. Trump again got the highest marks from residents of rural areas — a 62 percent approval rating and a 35 percent disapproval rating. And yet again, his standing took a nosedive among suburbanites and urbanites. In suburban areas, Trump’s approval rating was 32 percent, and his disapproval rating was 60 percent. In urban areas, his approval rating was 27 percent, and his disapproval rating was 67 percent. (The IBD/TIPP poll didn’t include “small town” as an option for respondents.) Overall, Trump’s approval/disapproval spread was much worse in the IBD/TIPP poll (39 percent approve, 55 percent disapprove) than it was in the Selzer poll, which explains why the IBD/TIPP poll is worse for Trump in all three geographic categories as well.

This is perhaps stating the obvious, but Trump would do well to improve his standing among suburban and urban voters before 2020. Less than 20 percent of the U.S. population lives in rural areas. Granted, not all rural voters will cast their ballot for the president, nor will all urban and suburban voters back whoever is the Democratic nominee. But elections are winner-take-all contests waged within discrete geographic areas — states or districts. According to the Congressional Density Index from CityLab, a news website covering urban issues, just 70 congressional districts are “pure rural,” and an additional 114 are a “rural-suburban mix.” CityLab is still in the process of making similar assessments for states, but David Montgomery, a journalist for CityLab, told FiveThirtyEight that 11 states could be classified as mostly rural, while an additional 17 could be classified as a mix of rural areas and suburbs. The former are worth a combined 53 electoral votes, while the latter are worth a combined 138; 270 are needed to win a presidential election.

None of this means that Trump lacks a path to electoral victory. It’s still early in the 2020 campaign; approval ratings may change, and a person’s feelings about the president aren’t the only determinant of his or her vote. But those numbers aren’t great for Republicans even if institutions like the Electoral College give disproportionate influence to rural areas. Without urban and suburban areas, they’ll find it difficult to cobble together a sustainable majority.

Why these people all worship that quintessential city boy Donald Trump — a man who hates Southern accents and personally holds them in contempt is the big mystery. Apparently, the fact that they hate the same people is all it takes.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

Trump’s favorite Feds

Trump’s favorite Feds

by digby

I’m pretty sure that Trump’s tweet about the federal workers being Democrats comes from some right winger on Fox saying that they are all Public Employee union members, many of them African American. That’s been one of their tropes for a very long time.

And his comment that federal workers want him to keep the government shut down until he gets his wall is probably true — it was border patrol and ICE agents saying it. For now. They may end up wanting to be able to pay their bills more than getting that stupid wall which they know better than anyone is totally ridiculous.

And Trump found a way to at least pay some of the uniformed federal employees (the only ones for whom he shows any respect) — the Coast Guard. I wonder if those Border patrol and ICE agents might be wondering why their hero hasn’t gone to bat for them too? I mean, he’s the smartest, greatest, strongest president the country has ever produced. Why can’t he get them their paychecks?

Someone should ask why his big hands cannot help his favorite Feds? Why is he so impotent, so weak?

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.

What happens if his new toadies are as authoritarian and corrupt as he is?

What happens if his new toadies are as authoritarian and corrupt as he is?

by digby

John Kelly gave an exit interview to the LA Times:

Trump sometimes pressed his advisors on the limits of his authority under the law, often asking Kelly, “‘Why can’t we do it this way?’” 

But Trump never ordered him to do anything illegal, Kelly stressed, “because we wouldn’t have.” 

“If he had said to me, ‘Do it, or you’re fired,’” Kelly said he would have resigned.

Will Mick Mulvaney tell him what he wants to hear? Will Stephen Miller? Matt Whitaker? William Barr? White House counsel Pat Cippolone?

Would they quit if he ordered them to do something illegal?

I honestly don’t know. What I do know is that the president is a corrupt and possibly traitorous criminal with no moral or ethical compass. So we cannot count on him not to give that order. And as he’s backed into a corner more and more it’s likely he will be even more inclined to do it.

I have a feeling this question is going to become very relevant in 2019.

If you value what we write here, I hope you’ll consider supporting the blog with a couple of bucks. If you’ve already donated, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. If you haven’t and would like to, the paypal buttons are on the sidebar and below as is the snail mail address.

Buckle up everybody. It’s going to be a very bumpy New Year …


cheers — digby

Digby’s Hullabaloo
2801 Ocean Park Blvd.
Box 157
Santa Monica, Ca 90405

.