Skip to content

Month: December 2018

Cohen isn’t the first presidential lawyer to go to jail

Cohen isn’t the first presidential lawyer to go to jail

by digby

… and it was for paying hush money too. From the NYT’s David Leonhardt’s newsletter:

This isn’t the first time the president’s lawyer is headed for jail. Herbert Kalmbach, Richard Nixon’s personal lawyer and one of the first people to come clean about Watergate, “received a prison sentence on June 17, 1974, exactly two years after the Watergate break-in, for funneling hush money to Watergate defendants,” Time Magazine’s Olivia Waxman notes. Two months later, Nixon resigned.

BY the way, our sleazy mafia Don Trump tweeted this, this morning, evidently trying to implicate Cohen’s family again:

And then he screamed:

He’s got a bad feeling about this by @BloggersRUs

He’s got a bad feeling about this
by Tom Sullivan

Just after former Trump fixer Michael Cohen received his prison sentence in a New York courtroom Wednesday, the sitting president’s legal troubles went from bad to worse:

In a court document released Wednesday, the tabloid publisher, American Media Inc., admitted to coordinating a hush-money payment with Trump’s 2016 campaign, reversing two years of denials. The confession came as part of an immunity agreement with the U.S. attorney’s office in New York, made public shortly after Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to three years in prison over charges of tax fraud, campaign finance violations and lying to Congress.

AMI’s immunity in the ongoing campaign finance investigation against the Trump campaign “is a huge red flag and loud gong against the president,” Gene Rossi, a former federal prosecutor, told Politico:

As part of the deal, the tabloid publisher acknowledged a series of “admitted facts” tied to its work with the Trump campaign to ensure damaging allegations about the real estate mogul didn’t come out before Election Day 2016. The arrangement — which involved Pecker, Cohen and one other member of Trump’s campaign — stretched back to August 2014, according to a separate court filing on Friday.

In the document released Wednesday, AMI confirmed that it paid a woman $150,000 in “cooperation, consultation and concert” with Trump’s campaign to ensure she “did not publicize damaging allegations about that candidate before the 2016 presidential election and thereby influence the election.”

The payments from AMI to Playboy model Karen McDougal, the company admitted, were campaign-related and undeclared in violation of federal campaign law. Cohen admitted payments he made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels were also campaign-related, undeclared, and reimbursed through the Trump Organization disguised as business expenses.

By the end of the day Wednesday, everyone connected to the Trump Organization and not named Trump is convicted, cooperating, or immunized, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow observed Wednesday night, including longtime Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg who has been granted immunity by federal prosecutors. That leaves Trump’s family and Trump’s business. None of those are shielded from prosecution by Trump occupying the presidency. Indictment of Trump family members and his business are sure to follow.

This threatens the core of Trump’s outsized ego, Marcy Wheeler (emptywheel) told “Democracy Now!” on Monday.

“And so, I think we should start talking a lot more about how Trump is going to react when his eponymous corporation starts getting charged in crimes, as well,” Wheeler told Amy Goodman, “because, you know, that’s where his ego is invested, that’s where his alleged billions are invested. And that, too, I think, makes him vulnerable in a way other presidents have not been.”

Even if Justice Department protocols prevent the sitting president from being indicted, Trump could find himself called as a witness in a criminal prosecution of his campaign or his company, writes David Lurie, a New York attorney:

Trump might be faced with the excruciating problem of deciding whether to be the first sitting president to declare an intention to invoke his rights under the Fifth Amendment in a bid to avoid taking the stand. Furthermore, Trump might well be a critical witness for the defense, and could therefore face enormous pressure to take the stand voluntarily in order to lessen the risk that his companies would be convicted.

Or his children. Witness or not, Lurie believes, any such trial would effectively be a trial of Trump in the public’s mind.

That doesn’t even touch how the campaign finance violations and Russian conspiracy defrauded the American people. Presumably, those are also on prosecutors’ to-do list.

Princess Leia Organa: It could be worse.

[Garbage creature growls]

Han Solo: It’s worse.

They can’t even bring themselves to say they are going to wait for all the evidence

They can’t even bring themselves to say they are going to wait for all the evidence

by digby

These Republicans are too much. I guess I’m not surprised that they would fail to do their duty. But to put this stuff in their political (and actual) epitaphs surprises me. They clearly don’t believe there is any such thing as integrity or even respectability any more. It’s just pure tribalism:

Trump is implicated in illegally paying hush money to porn stars, cheating on his taxes (why else would he hide them?) and betraying the country by conspiring with Russian agents for money and power. They don’t care. They aren’t even trying to distance themselves from him.

.

About that National Enquirer safe

About that National Enquirer safe

by digby

I’m just going to repost this here:

Saturday, November 24, 2018

 
Remember that “safe” at the National Enquirer? It’s being opened.

by digby

One imagines this will be a blockbuster:

The National Enquirer’s long-held secrets about Donald Trump may be about to get substantially less secret.

Page Six is told that the longtime executive editor of the tabloid, Barry Levine, is penning a book for Hachette about the president.

A source says that the book will look into “Trump and his women,” although other insiders tell us that it could be more wide-ranging, even looking at the formerly cozy relationship between the Enquirer’s owner, David Pecker, and Trump. That said, it’s unclear exactly what Levine’s contract with the Enquirer would allow him to reveal about Pecker.

Of course, Pecker has been at the center of an investigation into alleged hush money payouts made to Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels — who both claim to have had affairs with Trump while he was married to First Lady Melania Trump. In August, Pecker was granted immunity in the probe.

Either way, Levine — who left the Enquirer in 2016 after 17 years — will have plenty of previously unreported material for the tome.

In its reporting on the relationship between Pecker and Trump, the Wall Street Journal wrote in June, that, “Tips about Mr. Trump poured into the tabloid after his television show ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ took off in 2002, but the Enquirer turned away stories that could paint him in a bad light, two former American Media employees said,” adding, “Barry Levine … reminded them that Mr. Pecker wouldn’t allow it, these former employees said.” No impediment now exists.

Levine has a pedigree in political exposés. He was part of a team that uncovered veep candidate John Edwards’ love child, and in 2010 he told New York magazine, “I dream of an office in Washington where aides to senators and congressmen come in on their lunch hour and tell us stories.” In the same interview, he somewhat presciently said, “If I were in Russia, I’d be taken out by a hail of bullets, because that’s what happens to investigative journalists there.”

I can’t imagine any of this could change things. But you never know…

You can bet that everyone will be consuming the salacious details with unalloyed delight. Especially all those evangelical voters and conservative movement leaders who used to clutch their pearls over immoral behavior by political officials.

Turns out that the more immoral they are the more they love them. Who knew?

.

Pecker dysfunction

Pecker dysfunction

by digby

Excerpt from the SDNY press release.

The Office also announced today that it has previously reached a non-prosecution agreement with AMI, in connection with AMI’s role in making the above-described $150,000 payment before the 2016 presidential election. As a part of the agreement, AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election. AMI further admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman’s story so as to prevent it from influencing the election. 

Assuming AMI’s continued compliance with the agreement, the Office has agreed not to prosecute AMI for its role in that payment. The agreement also acknowledges, among other things, AMI’s acceptance of responsibility, its substantial and important assistance in this investigation, and its agreement to provide cooperation in the future and implement specific improvements to its internal compliance to prevent future violations of the federal campaign finance laws. These improvements include distributing written standards regarding federal election laws to its employees and conducting annual training concerning these standards.

It would have been dicey to prosecute AMI since there are problematic First Amendment issues with respect to the National Enquirer. It’s true that they weren’t actually acting as the press but still … always something you’d want to avoid. But since they are confirming that Trump paid hush money to affect the election it’s a big problem for Trump. If his accountant Weisselberg has offered corroborating evidence all they have left is Republican Senators acting like the potted plants they are and excusing this behavior as business as usual.

Reminder: what Trump is accused of doing is paying off an adult film actress and a Playboy Playmate he slept with during the time his wife was caring for their newborn baby, and he did it to hide his deeds from the American people in the days before the presidential election.

And keep in mind that as that was going on he was out there saying this:

.

Trouble for Trump in the Big Apple

Trouble for Trump in the Big Apple

by digby

The presidential pardon power won’t help him with this:

New York Attorney Gen.-elect Letitia James says she plans to launch sweeping investigations into President Donald Trump, his family and “anyone” in his circle who may have violated the law once she settles into her new job next month.

“We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well,” James, a Democrat, told NBC News in her first extensive interview since she was elected last month.

James outlined some of the probes she intends to pursue with regard to the president, his businesses and his family members. They include:

Any potential illegalities involving Trump’s real estate holdings in New York, highlighting a New York Times investigation published in October into the president’s finances.

The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian official.

Examine government subsidies Trump received, which were also the subject of Times investigative work.

Whether he is in violation of the emoluments clause in the U.S. Constitution through his New York businesses.

Continue to probe the Trump Foundation.

“We want to investigate anyone in his orbit who has, in fact, violated the law,” said James, who was endorsed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

James campaigned on passing a bill to change New York’s double jeopardy laws with an eye on possible pardons coming out of the White House. James told NBC News she wants to be able to pursue state charges against anyone the president were to pardon over federal charges or convictions and whose alleged crimes took place in the state. Under current New York law, she might not be able to do that.

“I think within the first 100 days this bill will be passed,” she said, adding, “It is a priority because I have concerns with respect to the possibility that this administration might pardon some individuals who might face some criminal charges, but I do not want them to be immune from state charges.”

She’s also enlisting help from some prosecutorial heavy hitters, like former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as a part of her transition to help her identify important hires for her office with an eye on bringing in experts for its Trump-related investigations.

New York is home to the president’s namesake business, the Trump Organization, and it is where Trump’s presidential campaign was headquartered and his reelection campaign as well. And it is where a number of key events under special counsel Robert Mueller’s microscope, such as the controversial June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, took place. All of that falls within James’ jurisdiction.

As a result, she is about to become one of the most recognizable — and powerful — state attorneys general in the country.

“Taking on President Trump and looking at all of the violations of law I think is no match to what I have seen in my lifetime,” James said.

I like her clarity.

Notably, the trump Organization, Giuliani and Trump had no comment.

I assume the president will be tweeting that she’s “low IQ” any minute now.

.

Reality biting at Fox News?

Reality biting at Fox News?

by digby

Eric Boehlert has an interesting, and somewhat hopeful, analysis of where Fox News is heading in the age of Trump. It’s one of the more optimistic things I’ve read in a while and I hope he’s right:

Individual 1 is seething as Michael Cohen flips, implicating his former boss in a felony. Onetime national security adviser Michael Flynn moves prosecutors closer toward obstruction of justice inside the White House, Trump ally Roger Stone has taken the Fifth, and former campaign chair Paul Manafort got caught lying to prosecutors—again. This is all happening while House Democrats get ready to wield subpoena power come January. The walls are closing in on Donald Trump, and there’s likely nothing Fox News or its band of feeble defenders will be able to do to stop the legal onslaught in the weeks and months to come.

As the rat-tat-tat of revelations continues via Robert Mueller court filings, with each new document dump producing more bad news for the White House, the conservative hope that Fox News and the right-wing media would be able to spin away the torrent of shocking developments is looking more fantastic each day.

Since last year, a conservative mythology has been built up and widely shared within the D.C. media that if and when Mueller releases his final Russia report, Fox News and the GOP media will effectively debunk it—or at least raise enough doubts about it, thereby diminishing the political pain for Trump’s White House.

Remember, that’s the whole point of creating a conservative media echo chamber via cable news, talk radio, syndicated columnists, and an army of Twitter loyalists. The goal is to build a sustainable information bubble where Republicans can exist with their own alternative facts. And that’s where they have presided on a daily basis since Trump was inaugurated, as Fox News has faithfully delivered a view of the world that only the likes of Sarah Huckabee Sanders would consider to be realistic.

As the Mueller reckoning gains momentum and the drama unfolds in the legal realm, there’s very little Fox News and their lineup of sophomoric analysts can do to debunk the findings. Quite simply, Fox News is completely out of its element when it comes to trying to offer up a counter-narrative to Mueller’s serious and detailed Russia investigation. That very difficult job would require a team of extremely talented and adroit legal and political minds who would sift through the Mueller evidence and do their best to try to raise legitimate doubts about the unfolding allegations.

Honestly, that task wouldn’t even be possible at this point, considering the mountain of evidence that exists with regards to the criminality surrounding Trump and his team. But even if it were possible, Fox News doesn’t employ a stable of extremely talented legal and political minds. Instead, they employ Trump loyalists who have trouble responding to the White House’s mounting woes. Fox News just doesn’t have the intellectual firepower that’s required.

Note that host Tucker Carlson recently lashed out at Mueller for “threatening elderly men with life in prison for petty crimes” (he meant Manafort), and denounced the ongoing probe as a “grotesque joke.” Others assured GOP cable viewers that Cohen’s shocking admission of guilt with regard to lying about Trump being in negotiations with Russians during the 2016 campaign means “absolutely nothing.”

And Fox News favorite Matt Schlapp recently insisted Mueller was “blackmailing people into saying things and doing things, because they might have had a scummy part of their past.” That’s just a small sampling of the incoherent defenses being offered up on Fox News these days—when the propaganda channel isn’t simply ignoring Trump’s unfolding crises.

Read on …

Fox has a whole counter-narrative at the ready but Boehlert is right that it isn’t anything that will logically get the job done in the face of Mueller’s evidence. It’s a “whatabout her emails and the Deep State crims” counter-narrative. That will continue to work on the most fervent of faith-based Trump cultists. But there is at least 10% of them who lie in the real worls and unless the right wing noise machine can come up with a rational way to rebut the charges in a systematic way.

As Boehlert points out, they are no longer capable of doing that. When reality bites, their extreme lack of credibility renders them impotent.

.

What Trump voters see each night on Fox News

What Trump voters see each night on Fox News

by digby

Just don’t call them deplorable. Or racist.

.

QOTD: Zoe Lofgren

QOTD: Zoe Lofgren

by digby

You can’t make this stuff up:

In an effort to understand how Google search algorithms work, a Democratic congresswoman asked the tech company’s chief executive a simple question: “If you Google the word ‘idiot’ under images, a picture of Donald Trump comes up. How would that happen? How does search work so that that would occur?”

In the middle of a congressional hearing ostensibly about privacy and data collection, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) seemed to perform that search from the dais. As it turns out, the image results for “idiot” does reveal a page of mostly Trump photos.

Ted Lieu said yesterday that people shouldn’t do negative things if they don’t want their names associated with them on a google search. The same applies to acting like an idiot.

.

Is Trump thinking of dumping Pence? It would make sense.

Is Trump thinking of dumping Pence? It would make sense.

by digby

My Salon column today:

It looks as if The Trump Show will take some interesting turns in the new season, which begins Jan. 3. The teaser we saw on Tuesday was a doozy. Minority Leader and soon-to-be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer went up to the White House to meet with the president about the looming government shutdown and all hell broke loose before the meeting even started. When the fur starts flying at the photo-op, you know that things are going to get crazy.

Trump did his normal thing: Lying, exaggerating, threatening, bragging, complaining. But instead of the usual GOP sycophants clapping like a bunch of trained seals, this time he got pushback. He’s not used to that and it didn’t go well for him.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Trump stomped off and threw a folder full of papers around the room after the meeting, which is understandable. He had no idea what had just happened to him and he was frustrated.

It’s hard to believe it was this easy but Pelosi got him rattled by confronting him and then Schumer goaded him into yelling “I’ll proudly shut down the government if I don’t get what I want!” which, if it happens, is going to be an albatross around his neck. The Republicans are reportedly none too pleased that the greatest negotiator the world has ever known was so easily backed into a corner, leaving them with little room to maneuver on the budget, especially since the latest polling shows that a large majority of American don’t want a shutdown over the wall. Even 30 percent of Republicans are against it.

One person who had not one word to say about all this was Vice President Mike Pence, who sat frozen in a chair like a Madame Tussaud’s wax figure, not moving or changing expression the entire time. His behavior was so strange it went viral almost immediately:

It’s actually quite understandable that Pence was, well, a bit pensive. The meeting was a train wreck, and it’s plausible that he had recently been on the receiving end of Trump’s wild temper and was just happy not to be involved. After all, Trump had just suffered a major humiliation when Pence’s chief of staff, Nick Ayers, pulled out of an apparent agreement to move up and replace Trump’s departing chief of staff, John Kelly. Trump had foolishly announced Kelly’s departure as one of his distraction ploys during last week’s rollout of bad legal news and no doubt held Pence somewhat responsible for the humiliation when his boy backed out. That’s just how he rolls.

Nobody really knows why Ayers turned down the job. He’s been working for Pence from the beginning of the term and his main characteristic seems to be relentless ambition. But he did, and now Trump is scrambling to find someone. As of Tuesday afternoon, the White House had to backtrack and say that Kelly would stay on until after the first of the year.

The Ayers saga has been going on for some time. Apparently he was pushed hard by Ivanka and Jared Kushner, largely because of their antipathy for Kelly. There were strange little kabuki dances staged for the press, denying that there was any unpleasantness, but nobody was fooled. One of the more recent palace-intrigue stories might have also contributed to Ayers’ departure and Pence’s odd behavior. Gabriel Sherman at Vanity Fair reported recently that there was some talk that for all of his ostentatious bootlicking, Pence wasn’t really bringing anything to the party:

[Earlier this month] Trump hosted a 2020 strategy meeting with a group of advisers. Among the topics discussed was whether Mike Pence should remain on the ticket, given the hurricane-force political headwinds Trump will face, as demonstrated by the midterms, a source briefed on the session told me. “They’re beginning to think about whether Mike Pence should be running again,” the source said, adding that the advisers presented Trump with new polling that shows Pence doesn’t expand Trump’s coalition. “He doesn’t detract from it, but he doesn’t add anything either,” the source said. Last month, The New York Times reported that Trump had been privately asking advisers if Pence could be trusted, and that outside advisers have been pushing Nikki Haley to replace Pence.

It’s hard to know if Ayers’ abrupt departure from the White House might have anything to do with those musings, but you can bet that Pence has heard about it.

That polling is correct, by the way. Pence’s place on the ticket was always predicated on the need for Trump to reel in folks on the religious right who might be put off by his libertine ways. As it turns out, they love him just the way he is.

CNN’s Ron Brownstein looked at some previously unpublished results from the 2018 exit polls and they show something startling. Republicans actually ran poorly among white working-class women who are not evangelicals. Nearly three-fifths of those women voted for the Democrats, more than double the share of evangelical women. Even white working-class non-evangelical men, who did give Republicans a majority, still voted twice as often for Democrats as did white male working-class evangelicals. Most college-educated evangelicals voted for Republicans too. They are consistently Trump’s most ardent followers.

In fact, just last week a group gathered at the Trump Hotel in Washington to pray for him:

[L]ast Friday afternoon (Dec. 7), one of the hotel’s many glimmering ballrooms was transformed into a sanctuary, where dozens of worshippers held their hands aloft and spoke in tongues as Jon Hamill, co-founder of Washington, D.C.-based Lamplighter Ministries, led the group in prayer. Hamill — whom supporters describe as a prophet — closed his eyes tightly and shouted above the chattering: “In Jesus’ name, we declare the Deep State will not prevail!”

The Trump advisers who brought him his polling no doubt understand that these people are in the bag for 2020. But if they want to win they have to figure out a way to bring back some of those non-evangelical women who are abandoning the Republican Party in droves. In that respect, maybe putting Nikki Haley on the ticket makes some sense.

If people are talking about this to the press you can be sure Pence knows about this scuttlebutt too. So does Pence’s fair-haired boy, Nick Ayers, which may be informing his decision to spend more time with his money. That faraway look in the veep’s eye may be the look of someone who’s trying to come to terms with the fact that he’s just another in a long line of Donald Trump’s castoffs who have been used, abused and left with nothing.

.