Skip to content

Why is Barr doing this? To ensure the authorities don’t try to stop the 2020 interference

Published by digby on December 10, 2019

Why is Barr doing this? To ensure the authorities don’t try to stop the 2020 interference



by digby

I’ll just leave this here for now. Let’s just be clear, though. The only reason Barr is going to such lengths is to allow Donald Trump to cheat again without fear of anyone trying to stop him. If you see the full interview, you will see that he pulls a full Sergeant Schultz over Ukraine, acting like he hasn’t even thought about it and doesn’t see any problem with it.

He is ensuring that no one with any government investigative tools will look into anything Trump is doing. I suspect he will not have the same issue with anyone looking into his opponents. He certainly seems to be fine with a foreign government doing so at the president’s behest, under threat of losing US support:

Aaaaand: The Russian government agrees:

Here’s the article from NBC. You can see more of the interview there. It’s utterly mind-blowing. Barr is something else:

Attorney General William Barr said he still believes the FBI may have operated out of “bad faith” when it investigated whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, and he contends the FBI acted improperly by continuing the investigation after Donald Trump took office. 

In an exclusive interview with NBC News, Barr essentially dismissed the findings of the Justice Department’s inspector general that there was no evidence of political bias in the launching of the Russia probe, saying that his hand-picked prosecutor, John Durham, will have the last word on the matter.

“I think our nation was turned on its head for three years based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by a completely irresponsible press,” Barr said. “I think there were gross abuses …and inexplicable behavior that is intolerable in the FBI.” 

“I think that leaves open the possibility that there was bad faith.” 

Barr’s blistering criticism of the FBI’s conduct in the Russia investigation, which went well beyond the errors outlined in the inspector general report, is bound to stoke further controversy about whether the attorney general is acting in good faith, or as a political hatchet man for Trump. 

Inspector General Michael Horowitz, after reviewing a million documents and interviewing 100 people, concluded that he “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open” the investigations into Trump campaign aides. 

But Barr argued that Horowitz didn’t look very hard, and that the inspector general accepted the FBI’s explanations at face value. 

“All he said was, people gave me an explanation and I didn’t find anything to contradict it … he hasn’t decided the issue of improper motive,” Barr said. “I think we have to wait until the full investigation is done.” 

Barr said he stood by his assertion that the Trump campaign was spied on, noting that the FBI used confidential informants who recorded conversations with Trump campaign officials. 

“It was clearly spied upon,” he said. “That’s what electronic surveillance is … going through people’s emails, wiring people up.” 

Barr portrayed the Russia investigation as a bogus endeavor that was foisted on Trump, rather than something undertaken by career civil servants who were concerned about whether a foreign power had compromised a political campaign. 

“From a civil liberties standpoint, the greatest danger to our free system is that the incumbent government use the apparatus of the state … both to spy on political opponents but also to use them in a way that could affect the outcome of an election,” Barr said. He added that this was the first time in history that “counterintelligence techniques,” were used against a presidential campaign. 

Barr said that presidential campaigns are frequently in contact with foreigners, contradicting the comments of numerous political professionals who have said for two years that there is rarely, if ever, a reason for a presidential campaign to be in touch with Russians. 

Barr added, “There was and never has been any evidence of collusion and yet this campaign and the president’s administration has been dominated by this investigation into what turns out to be completely baseless.” 

But the biggest outrage, Barr said, is that the FBI’s “case collapsed after the election and they never told the court and they kept on getting these renewals.” 

 The inspector general report does not say the FBI’s Russia case collapsed after the election. It does say that the FBI interviewed some of the sources for the dossier written by a British operative, who raised questions about his reporting. But by then, the investigation had moved well beyond anything in the dossier.

I will have a lot more on this later.

.

Published inUncategorized