John Ratcliffe originally couldn’t get confirmed for Director of national Intelligence because he was completely unqualified and was found to have embellished his thin resume anyway. The Rogue Republican Party ended up confirming him and now he’s basically using the Intelligence Community as an arm of the Trump campaign:
President Trump’s spy chief ignored urgings from senior U.S. officials not to release information about Russian intelligence material containing unverified allegations about Hillary Clinton and the 2016 election, according to people familiar with the matter.
Officials at the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, as well as nonpolitical career personnel within the office of Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, feared that sharing the information with Congress would give credence to unsubstantiated Kremlin-backed material. They argued the claim was sourced to Russian intelligence services that interfered in the 2016 election to denigrate Mrs. Clinton, that year’s Democratic presidential nominee, and could have been deliberate disinformation, the people said.
A CIA spokesman referred reporters to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which Mr. Ratcliffe runs. The NSA declined to comment and referred questions to the same office, known as the ODNI.
“We don’t comment on internal [intelligence community] deliberations,” an ODNI spokeswoman said.
On Tuesday, Mr. Ratcliffe sent a letter to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that disclosed that Russian intelligence analysis obtained by U.S. spy agencies claimed that Mrs. Clinton, the 2016 Democratic nominee for president, had approved a campaign plan that year to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Moscow’s hacking of Democratic emails. Mr. Graham then released the letter publicly.
“The [intelligence community] does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” Mr. Ratcliffe said in the letter.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, on which Republicans have a majority, had already reviewed the Russians’ claim about Mrs. Clinton and deemed it to lack factual basis, according to people familiar with the matter. Politico earlier reported on the panel’s rejection of the Kremlin’s information.
Mr. Ratcliffe’s decision to release the material prompted criticism in interviews, on social media and in congressional testimony from Democratic lawmakers and former senior U.S. intelligence officials—many of whom have served both Republican and Democratic administrations—that Mr. Ratcliffe is using his position to help Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign.
“This is the most blatant act of politicization by a DNI that I have ever seen,” wrote Mike Morrell, a former senior CIA official under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, on Twitter.
Former FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, “It contains within it a statement that it is unverified information, so I really don’t know what he’s doing.”
Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, said the claim was “utter, baseless, bullshit.”
Mr. Trump made a brief reference to the letter at Tuesday night’s presidential debate. “What happened today with Hillary Clinton, where it was a whole big con job,” Mr. Trump said.
Following the disclosure of his letter, Mr. Ratcliffe denied the Kremlin-sourced claims were Russian disinformation, and said they had “not been assessed as such by the intelligence community.”
Mr. Ratcliffe, a former Republican congressman, was a vocal supporter of Mr. Trump before taking the spy-chief job earlier this year. Democrats have accused him of abusing his position to try to help Mr. Trump in the November election, arguing Mr. Ratcliffe is seeking to wield intelligence—especially as it relates to Russian election interference—on behalf of Mr. Trump, who dismissed previous intelligence directors after clashing with them over the issue.
“Ratcliffe is even willing to rely on unverified Russian information to try to concoct a political scandal, a shocking abdication of his responsibilities to the country,” Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said.
How many of these cronies in Trump’s government are prepared to compromise the security of the United States for Donald Trump? How many will sell what they know once they are out of office — starting with Donald Trump?
If past is prologue, many.