Skip to content

Month: January 2021

Woe is Q

Anti-gay protesters appeared outside Comet Ping Pong in Washington, D.C. (home of “Pizzagate“) the night before the Biden-Harris inauguration. (Photo via Washingtonian tweet.)

The Trump Insurrection of Jan. 6 was not the much-anticipated QAnon “Storm.” Neither did the Qpocalypse happen on Wednesday. Donald Trump left town, left his cult in the lurch, and Q-drops prophesying that Joe Biden would never take office were a bust. There was no eleventh-hour deus ex machina. What’s an internet cultist to do?

Eric Lutz reminds Vanity Fair readers how another busted end-times prophesy played out.

Harold Camping predicted the Rapture would occur on May 21, 2011. The faithful prepared. One true believer put his life savings into posters in New York subways warning the end was coming. It didn’t:

“I think I was part of a cult,” one regretful former follower of the late Camping said, a year after the world didn’t end.

Now it is QAnon’s turn.

“I’m about to puke,” one QAnon devotee posted online as these events unfolded, according to the Daily Beast. “I feel stupid,” wrote another.

Some of the faithful will engage in what I call the “well-uh, well-uhs” to explain why the magic did not work as promised. Others who did not throw up threw in the towel:

Some, rather than accept that fact, tried to spin new theories to explain why the Storm hadn’t come. Maybe it was all part of Trump’s plan. Maybe Biden was even “part of the plan,” as some suggested, according to the Washington Post. But others appeared to resign themselves to the fact that what they’d believed would never happen. “Wake up,” one Q follower wrote in a chatroom, according to the Times. “We’ve been had.” Ron Watkins, a prominent figure in the QAnon movement who has been rumored to be Q himself, more or less seemed to acknowledge as much on Wednesday, suggesting that others in the community “go back to our lives as best as we are able,” and “remember all the friends and happy memories” they’d made.

At least we’ll have Washington is Watkins’s upbeat message for those who don’t face prison.

The Washington Post offers in its postmortem:

Graham Brookie, director of the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, which tracks misinformation, said QAnon followers are making increasingly illogical leaps as they struggle to make sense of developments.

“It’s something that has long been true of conspiracy theories: When they don’t come to fruition, they shift their delusions to the next thing,” he said. He noted how some comments posted below Trump’s farewell video suggested that “it wasn’t quite time for the Great Awakening, but it’s coming soon and this is how.”

One aspect that has not received as much ink is that QAnon has an international following, one that may not evaporate with the Trump presidency. Germany and Japan have “particularly strong and growing” QAnon followings.

Researchers also speculate that QAnon’s militarized core may yet prove a real threat.

“History has taught us far-right movements don’t cool off during a Democratic administration,” researcher Travis View tells the Post. “The people who stick with it are going to become even more radicalized and potentially more dangerous.”

One more Trump legacy Joe Biden does not need on his plate, and one more thing for you to worry about when finally you get to eat out again at your neighborhood pizzeria.

Don’t sit with your back to the door.

Save our sports?

Since taking office, President Joe Biden has issued a sweeping spread of executive orders affecting the coronavirus pandemic, environment, labor, immigration, and more. He immediately swept aside many policies put in place by his predecessor. Biden is expected today to sign an order requiring $15 per hour minimum pay and emergency paid leave for federal workers.

But what has conservatives upset more is a Biden order built upon last year’s 6-3 Supreme Court ruling extending protections afforded under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to LGBTQ Americans (Washington Post):

Biden’s order calls on agencies across the federal government to review existing regulations and policies that prohibit sex discrimination, and to revise them as necessary to clarify that “sex” includes sexual orientation and gender identity.

“Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports,” Biden’s executive order states. “Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes. People should be able to access healthcare and secure a roof over their heads without being subjected to sex discrimination.”

The executive order set the stage for an administration that has pledged to pursue a “bold” agenda on LGBTQ issues and that has already named LGBTQ leaders to prominent positions in the administration.

For all their small-government, fiscal-conservative pretensions in the land of “created equal,” what really riles up conservatives is treating other people like people. After Biden signed the order Thursday, the Post reports, the hashtag #BidenErasedWomen began trending.

“On the same day he called for healing and unity, President Joe Biden signed a radical divisive transgender executive order that threatens the privacy and safety of women in single-sex facilities, equality and fairness in single-sex sports, and good medicine based on the reality that males and females are biologically different,” said Ryan T. Anderson, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation.

“In reality, it spells the end of girls’ and women’s sports as we know them,” Anderson added. Because conservative organizations like Heritage and the Federalist Society exist first and foremost to protect American sports. Which is why multiple news outlets (including two owned by Rupert Murdoch) quote condemnation of Biden’s order by the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, whose stable of retired military officers are recognized authorities on women’s sports.

Naturally, Republicans on Capitol Hill raced to save our sports:

On the same day Biden gave the order, Representative Greg Steube (R-FL) tweeted that “by forcing biological female athletes to compete against biological male athletes in competitive sports, we are taking away women’s opportunities on and off the field.”

On Thursday, Steube reintroduced the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act which he had put forward earlier in the month before Biden took office and which is backed by 13 other GOP lawmakers.

In a statement, he said the bill would “protect women and girls in competitive sports. It states that “in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”

One thing the Trump presidency demonstrated is that so much of conservative pearl-clutching has little to do with concerns not-so-cleverly hidden behind small-government or fiscal conservative window-dressing and preening over values. Who counts as equal and who gets excluded is where the battle lines lie.

When you lose your tax lawyers …

This can’t be good news for Trump:

“The law firm that handled the tax affairs of Donald Trump and his company during his presidency said it would stop representing him and his business,” The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday. “The firm, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, is currently wrangling with the New York attorney general’s office over documents related to its work for the former president’s business, the Trump Organization. Led by Democratic Attorney General Letitia James, the office is conducting a civil-fraud probe into Mr. Trump’s financial dealings.”

“Morgan Lewis joins other firms that have distanced themselves from Mr. Trump in recent days. After the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Seyfarth Shaw LLP said it had notified the Trump Organization it would no longer represent the company,” the newspaper reported.

“The New York attorney general’s office in August asked a judge to order Morgan Lewis and Ms. Dillon to comply with subpoenas that were part of its civil-fraud probe. The attorney general’s office argued the firm had refused to hand over substantive communications between Ms. Dillon and key Trump Organization employees. Morgan Lewis said the documents in question were protected by attorney-client privilege,” the newspaper reported. During the deposition, Ms. Dillon said she had no idea how many times she met with Mr. Trump’s son Eric Trump about Seven Springs, a Trump estate in New York’s Westchester County that is part of the attorney general’s probe, the letter said.”

The newspaper published a statement from the law firm.”We have had a limited representation of the Trump Organization and Donald Trump in tax-related matters,” a Morgan Lewis spokesperson said. “For those matters not already concluded, we are transitioning as appropriate to other counsel.”

It one thing to lose your leasing managers or even your bank. Losing your tax accountants when you are under criminal and civil investigation for fraud and possibly money laundering, not to mention the IRS, has to be worrying. These are people who know things and you want to keep them as close as possible.

I have no idea if any of these investigations will pan out. Rich, politically connected people usually get away with their crimes in this country so I don’t have my hopes up. But now that he’s out of power, there’s really no downside to making Donald Trump nervous.

No Malarky

Biden wants unity but it doesn’t appear that he’s going to put up with GOP bullsit either. At least not when it comes to “burrowing” Trump saboteurs:

A standoff between the Biden administration and the National Labor Relations Board’s general counsel ended Wednesday evening in the top lawyer’s firing, according to a White House official.

The fracas over now-former general counsel Peter Robb’s tenure unfolded just hours into Joe Biden’s presidency. It began earlier Wednesday, when the Biden administration asked Robb to resign, the White House official said, a precedent-breaking move first reported by Bloomberg Law.

But Robb, a Trump appointee with 10 months left in his Senate-confirmed role, refused. In a letter to the White House, he called the request “unprecedented since the nascence of the National Labor Relations Act” and said his removal “would set an unfortunate precedent,” according to Law360.

Biden reportedly told Robb he should step down by 5 p.m. or he would be fired. By 8:45 p.m., the general counsel position on the NLRB’s online organizational chart was listed as “vacant.”ADhttps://cc3f345d8133885224f6f01199ae4d57.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

A spokesperson for the NLRB declined to comment, and Robb did not respond to an emailed request.

Labor groups celebrated Robb’s dismissal and hailed it as a welcome departure from Trump administration policies they deemed hostile toward workers and unions. Biden, who pledged on the eve of the election to be “the most pro-union president you’ve ever seen,” has sought to appeal to working-class Americans and received several key endorsements from organized labor.

Advocates said they hope the action is the first of many such changes.

“This is exactly the kind of aggressive posture that I’ve been hoping to see from the new administration,” Angus Johnston, a historian and founder of StudentActivism.net, wrote on Twitter.

Robb, a former management lawyer who was involved in President Ronald Reagan’s infamous battle against the air traffic controllers union, brought a pro-business approach to the board, which is tasked with overseeing union elections and upholding workers’ rights to organize.

Republicans decried Robb’s firing and said Biden was jeopardizing the agency’s independence. Other critics pointed out that President Barack Obama did not fire Ronald Meisburg, the board’s top prosecutor who was appointed by President George W. Bush and served out his term, which lasted more than a year after the Democrat took office.

I don’t know if being tough about this will translate to other decisions in dealing with the Trump collaborators (which means the entire GOP) but it’s a good first sign.

Worse than we thought

Of course it is:

Twelve minutes before noon on Wednesday, President Joe Biden was sworn into office as the nation’s 46th president. Seven hours later, the United States reported more than 4,409 new deaths from the novel coronavirus, according to data collected by the COVID-19 Tracking Project.

The Biden administration came into power with purpose and an extensive agenda to combat the coronavirus pandemic, but purpose and planning only gets you so far—particularly when the president’s team is only just now getting a clear picture of how badly the previous administration had managed the crisis.

“What we’re inheriting from the Trump administration is so much worse than we could have imagined,” Jeff Zients, the Biden administration’s COVID-19 czar, said in a call with reporters Wednesday. “We don’t have the visibility that we would hope to have into supply and allocations.”

“I think we have to level-set expectations,” added Tom Frieden, the former director for the Centers for Disease Control in the Obama administration. “There are lots of things that an incoming administration can do on Day One, including speaking honestly about the pandemic.”

The new administration is already behind, in part because the Trump administration was unprecedentedly hostile during the transition. The question now, however, is how Biden can get a handle on a raging pandemic when his team is already so far behind.

The task at hand is enormous. More than 400,000 Americans have died of COVID-19. Every state, territory and the District of Columbia is in a state of emergency. The number of people infected with the virus who are now hospitalized is more than double the number reached during the spring and summer peaks.At least we won’t have a president that’s actively fighting those rules on national television.— official working with Biden COVID team

It’s not just the spread of the virus that the Biden team needs to tackle. Officials will also have to confront the disinformation and misinformation about the virus that has permeated all four corners of the country—where people still believe the virus is a hoax and that public health guidelines are too great of an imposition on their personal freedom to follow. But it’s unclear what power of persuasion the Biden administration will hold and if it will be enough to convince people to take the virus more seriously.

“At least we won’t have a president that’s actively fighting those rules on national television,” one official working with the new Biden COVID-19 team said.

More urgently, Biden and his team will have to handle the growing frustration among states over the lack of a comprehensive vaccine-distribution program that enables them to inoculate their residents quickly. They will have to find a way to get states more vaccines needed to meet Americans’ growing demand for the shot.

Biden’s COVID-19 team says the president will use the Defense Production Act (DPA) to ensure that health-care facilities have what they need for personal protective equipment and to continue to scale testing across the country. Officials say Biden will also use the act and “other legal authorities” for “raw materials to ensure that bottlenecks do not slow down [vaccine] production,” Zients said, specifically mentioned the production of syringes as critical to success.

It’s still unclear exactly when the president will invoke the DPA, and if the administration will lean on the legal authority for the production of supplies other than vaccine syringes.

“Making vaccines is not simple, and you can’t cut any corners,” Frieden said. “We’ll see if there’s anything more that can be done.”

Biden enters office as states across the country are grappling with massive vaccine shortages. Hospitals and pharmacies have begun to run out, forcing them to cancel first and second dose appointments. Officials in states such as California, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, New York, New Jersey, and Arizona this week called on the federal government to not only help facilitate the shipment of additional vaccines but to clearly communicate how many doses they should expect to receive in the coming days. They’ve received no answers, according to six state health officials, all of whom requested to remain anonymous to speak more freely about the issue.

Here’s an example of how screwed up this is:

As Los Angeles County makes coronavirus vaccinations available to residents 65-year-old and over, public health officials say doses are in “extremely limited supply.”

“To county residents who are 65 and older please understand that how soon you can get a vaccination depends on the number of doses we receive every week,” L.A. County Public Health Director Dr. Barbara Ferrer said Wednesday.

Ferrer says with nearly 1.4 million seniors 65 and older and up to 800,000 eligible health care workers, the number of vaccines needed to complete two shots is more than 4 million. But so far, just over 850,000 doses have been delivered.

“Often we do not know from one week to the next how many doses will be allocated to L.A. County,” Ferrer said.

It’s a mess. And it’s going to take some time to get it straightened out. Everyone still needs to hunker down for a while.

And so it begins

The Republicans have wasted no time in starting their patented pearl clutching about “civility. But this is really rich. These people don’t seem to understand that when they whine about Biden condemning white supremacists because it’s divisive and hurts all those very fine people who didn’t vote for him, they are owning white supremacy as their own.

We are 2 weeks from a guy wearing a Camp Auschwitz hoodie storming the Capitol, and even Trump’s DHS labeled white supremacists as our biggest domestic threat.

But by mentioning white supremacy Biden is “divisive” and attacking whites.
Welcome to the next 4 years of gaslighting.

If a guy spends 20 minutes saying we are good people, we need unity and then says, “but we can’t tolerate white supremacists” and your response is to be offended, then maybe the problem is with you.

Good summary of the bad faith media effort trying to persuade all whites that Biden's criticism of white supremacy is actually an attack on them. Via @pbump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/21/bidens-targeting-racist-extremism-is-being-portrayed-an-attack-right-itself/

For a democracy to function, its leaders need to be able to defend it from threats. But Biden can’t criticize white nationalists without Tucker Carlson declaring “PARTY IN POWER IS DEMONIZING HALF OF THE COUNTRY.”
@ThePlumLineGS gets at the reason why.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/01/21/gop-response-biden-speech-unity/

Originally tweeted by Don Moynihan (@donmoyn) on January 21, 2021.

That is exactly right. They are masters of this smarmy garment rending over alleged “incivility” and the fact that we just put up with four solid years of the most grotesque, insulting, fascistic behavior from their leader will be met with “why re you talking about Donald Trump? He’s not here anymore. Why are you treating your fellow Americans so disrespectfully?”

I knew this would happen. It’s how they roll. They are natural trolls. In fact, they pretty much invented the concept. But they are outdoing themselves by starting this just three weeks out from their followers storming the US Capitol and marauding through the halls screaming for blood. Chutzpah doesn’t begin to describe it.

So proud of this kid

Braydon Harrington is the kid Biden tok aside and talked to him about his own stutter. It helped:

I know this stuff is sentimental and we’re supposed to care about policy to the excuslion of everything else. But this is real. It happened. And it means something.

“The end is coming”

The latest from Jonathan Swan on the Final Days is juicy. It’s about the breakdown in the relationship between Trump and Pence:

“The end is coming, Donald.”

The male voice in the TV ad boomed through the White House residence during “Fox & Friends” commercial breaks. Over and over and over. “The end is coming, Donald. … On Jan. 6, Mike Pence will put the nail in your political coffin.

The Lincoln Project, the anti-Trump PAC dedicated to pissing off the president with viral commercials, was back in his head with their voodoo.

President Trump, furious, told his vice president to send the Lincoln Project gang a cease-and-desist letter. In reality, this would only have further delighted Trump’s tormentors and provided ammo for another ad. Marc Short, chief of staff to Mike Pence, consulted officials on the Trump campaign. Their advice: Just ignore it.

The idea for the ad had popped into Steve Schmidt’s head when he woke onthe morning of Dec. 2. Schmidt was a former Republican strategist who had renounced the party and dedicated himself to its destruction after Trump’s ascent.

Schmidt was also a co-founder of the Lincoln Project, which counted amongst its activists lawyer George Conway, a prolific troller of Trump on Twitter and the husband of former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway.

“There’s zero fucking chance Trump knows what happens on Jan. 6,” Schmidt told ex-GOP strategist Rick Wilson and other Lincoln Project members on a team conference call at 11 a.m. later that morning. “Oh my God,” Wilson responded, bursting into laughter. “There’s no way he does.”

By law, on Jan. 6, the House and Senate would meet in a joint session of Congress to formally count the results of the Electoral College, and it would be the vice president’s job, in his role as president of the Senate, to declare Joe Biden the winner.

By that afternoon, the Lincoln Project had finalized a 70-word script and shipped it to their lawyers. A cut of the commercial was ready early the next day, and by Dec. 10 the 38-second spot would hit the air. They made a cheap booking for Fox News shows running in the D.C. market.

Their target audience of one lived at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

After the Electoral College met on Dec. 14 to affirm Biden’s victory, some West Wing officials hoped the president would finally acknowledge reality. Short knew that if he didn’t, it was only a matter of time before Trump set his sights on Pence.

Trump had been fed more and more disinformation that the vice president had the power to reengineer the Electoral College vote. With a last gasp, he seized this confected idea and blew life into it.

Pence, who had dutifully defended Trump during the countless scandals of the past four years, had done his part to support Trump’s election fraud challenges while keeping a distance from the more outlandish conspiracies pushed by the likes of Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and crackpots who had the president’s ear.

But it was increasingly clear that Trump was going to test the most loyal foot soldier in his inner circle on Jan. 6, when the Constitution required the vice president to preside over a joint session of Congress to certify the Electoral College results.

By Christmas, Trump had made it clear to Pence that he wanted him to object. Pence demurred, explaining that the vice president’s role in the process was largely ceremonial but that his general counsel Greg Jacob would look into it.

Trump’s outside lawyers were filling his mind with junk legal theories about Pence’s constitutional authorities. One of those lawyers was Mark Martin, a former chief justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court who’d become dean of the law school at Regent University in Virginia Beach. Trump urged Pence to listen to Martin during a three-way conference call.

Also involved was White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, who was publicly claiming Pence could stand in the way of Biden taking office. This was what Trump wanted to hear, and it turned him ever harder against the vice president and the legal sticklers on his staff.

Short responded dryly to Navarro’s claims, telling the Wall Street Journal: “Peter Navarro is many things. He is not a constitutional scholar.”

The battle for control of the president’s mind and a parallel struggle over the Constitution brought out warriors on both sides of this unprecedented theater of war inside the White House.

It brought out, too, a healthy dose of prayer for celestial counsel and wisdom from the deeply religious vice president and his senior team as they struggled through the mess. Some of them would soon find themselves in the crosshairs of Trump’s disciples.

After Navarro convinced Trump that Short had turned Pence against him, Trump told aides Short was no longer welcome in the West Wing. Pence’s team, meanwhile, was aggravated that White House chief of staff Mark Meadows appeared to do little to stop the flow of bad information to the president. Rather than act as gatekeeper, Meadows seemed to find ever more crazies to stick in front of the president.

Then, on Dec. 28, Trump ally Congressman Louie Gohmert sued Pence in federal court as part of a bizarre and futile bid to force him to discard Biden’s electors.

Pence’s office suspected that Trump himself had encouraged Gohmert. Days later, Trump called Pence to express surprise after learning that his own Justice Department had intervened in the vice president’s defense.

On a couple of occasions, Short approached Meadows to ask for his advice. Trump’s pressure campaign was growing more desperate, spilling into public view, and the vice-president’s office wanted Meadows’ help in heading off a foreseeable but mounting disaster. Meadows sheepishly responded that expectations for Pence had grown high. He said they needed to “figure that out.” He seemed reluctant to rein things in.

Trump’s floundering campaign to overturn the results of Nov. 3had reached its most obsessive stage. The president’s viewfinder was the same one that had served him well in his days as a combative and flamboyant New York property developer: The deal is the steal and the steal is the deal. If you’re not with me, you’re against me.

In his final weeks, the president had increasingly come to view his inner circle of loyalists as a bunch of weaklings and quitters.

The mild-mannered White House counsel Pat Cipollone, a voice of restraint in the Oval Office and the architect of Trump’s impeachment defense last year, was routinely finding himself in animated debates with the president.

Attorney General Bill Barr, long regarded as the most loyal member of the Cabinet, had left after refusing to endorse Trump’s claims of widespread voter fraud.

On the evening of Jan. 4, with only two days until the votes for Biden were certified, Trump had another stab at changing the vice president’s mind, wheeling in yet another of his outside experts.

“You know Mike, he’s a really respected constitutional lawyer,” the president insisted from behind the Resolute Desk. “You should really hear him out.”

Trump was referring to John Eastman, a conservative attorney and one of several fringe voices claiming that the vice president had the power to derail the Electoral College certification process.

Outside on the South Lawn, Marine One hummed, waiting to take the president to Joint Base Andrews. From there, Air Force One would whisk him to Georgia to rally for the following day’s Senate runoff elections.

Earlier, Short had told Meadows that Pence would agree to meet with Eastman before the Jan. 6 joint session, but that he didn’t want a “cast of characters” like Giuliani to attend. Meadows agreed and Giuliani was proscribed, for that meeting at least.

Now Eastman was seated in front of Trump — along with Pence and several other senior officials. Pence patiently and deliberately cross-examined Eastman about his legal theory, which effectively argued the vice president had unilateral authority to send electors back to state legislatures if they believed there was unconstitutional fraud.

One example cited was from 1801, when Thomas Jefferson counted electors from Georgia in his favor after the certificate he was presented with was defective.

But the theory was bunk, in Team Pence’s firm view. Nobody had disputed that Jefferson had won Georgia, and the 12th Amendment passed three years later made the entire precedent moot. Moreover, in 1887, the Electoral Count Act was passed to clarify this even further.

If Thomas Jefferson could do it, then Mike Pence could do it, the fringe advisers were telling the president. But Pence’s own legal advisers were telling him those ideas were rubbish, and that there were 150 years of legal precedent to say so.

Eastman cited another example from 1961, when Hawaii sent multiple slates of electors to Congress due to a late recount that flipped the state’s narrow margin from red to blue. In this instance, unlike in 2020, both slates were certified, and no one objected to Nixon magnanimously counting the Democratic electors for John F. Kennedy, who was the clear winner.

In essence, Pence’s staff believed Eastman was advocating for a maximalist position that no serious conservative could support — the monarchical idea that one man could overturn a U.S. election. Eastman disputed this characterization, telling Axios that he was simply advocating for Pence to delay the certification for a few days so that state legislatures could review the election.

Trump would not give up. Later that night in a rally in Dalton, Georgia,ahead of the Senate runoffs, he told a crowd of rowdy supporters: “I hope Mike Pence comes through for us, I have to tell you … He’s a great guy. Of course, if he doesn’t come through, I won’t like him quite as much.”

Across the state in the small town of Milner, Pence told his own crowd gathered in a church: “I promise you, come this Wednesday, we’ll have our day in Congress, we’ll hear the objections, we’ll hear the evidence.”

Trump called Pence late morning on Jan. 6 to take one last shot at bullying the vice president into objecting to the certification of Biden’s victory.

As Pence rode to the U.S. Capitol to preside over the joint session of Congress, Trump addressed his fateful rally at the Ellipse. “If Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election. … He has the absolute right to do it,” Trump said.

“All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become president, and you are the happiest people,” Trump declared as he whipped up the crowd. “After this, we’re going to walk down and I’ll be there with you,” Trump shouted — falsely as it turned out, as he had no intention of marching with the mob.

He amped things up a bit more in what many now point to as evidence of incitement: “You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”

While Trump was speaking, Pence released a long statement acknowledging the inevitable: He did not have the constitutional authority to carry out Trump’s wishes. And he would uphold his oath.

Then the pro-Trump mob took off to breach the Capitol, hell-bent on blocking the vote. As they ransacked the building, some rioters were heard chanting: “Hang Mike Pence!”

Pence and his family were evacuated from the Senate chamber and taken to a secure site, where the vice president remained for hours. Trump, sequestered in his private dining room to watch the TV coverage, placed no calls to check on Pence’s safety.

As late as 2:42 p.m., the president was still tweeting abuse against the man who had pledged his loyalty more strenuously than any other politician over the past four years. “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution,” Trump announced on Twitter, shortly before Twitter threw him off.

Some Republican allies, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, would not speak to Trump again after what unfolded at the Capitol. McConnell would point the finger at Trump.

But not Pence. After all the bullying, the abuse, the Twitter tirades, the calls to violence, Pence assessed his options. He’d stood with Trump — not complaining, not explaining — through the four years. He was a vehement conservative, more ideologue than transactional. He’d broken with Trump on this one matter — the sanctity of democratically held elections — and he still had other fish to fry.

Five days later, Pence broke the silence, meeting again with Trump on Jan. 11 in the Oval Office. They’d visit again in person on Jan. 14 and on a call on Jan. 15. But on the eve of the transfer of power, Pence’s team made clear he’d not be able to attend Trump’s final sendoff at Joint Base Andrews, choosing instead to attend Biden’s swearing in.

Many believe Pence intends to run for president in 2024. He is likely to preserve his bridge to Trump beyond Jan. 20, at least long enough to understand whether it’s needed — or not.

Pence is on a rehabilitation tour and many members of the press are all too ready to help him with that. Beware. He is Trump’s number one collaborator, never forget it.

Americans in name only

Image
Twitter photo via Ryan Mac, senior tech reporter @BuzzFeedNews.

“I’m calling all of them seditionists,” writes Ann Applebaum at The Atlantic, meaning Trump supporters who cheered but did not particpate in the Jan. 6 insurrection. There are too many to call extremists and too few to call secessionists, she believes. Neither fascists, rebels nor white supremacists seems to fit the bill.

“Not all Republicans are seditionists,” she observes, “nor is everyone who voted for Trump, nor is every conservative: Nothing about rejecting your country’s political system is conservative.” So what to do with/about the, say, 10-15 percent of Americans who are seditionists? Or about others like QAnon believer, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who get elected to Congress as a means of undermining their own government? They cannot be wished away or all locked away.

We must somehow coexist, Applebaum argues:

Here’s another idea: Drop the argument and change the subject. That’s the counterintuitive advice you will hear from people who have studied Northern Ireland before the 1998 peace deal, or Liberia, or South Africa, or Timor-Leste—countries where political opponents have seen each other as not just wrong, but evil; countries where people are genuinely frightened when the other side takes power; countries where not all arguments can be solved and not all differences can be bridged. In the years before and after the peace settlement in Northern Ireland, for example, many “peacebuilding” projects did not try to make Catholics and Protestants hold civilized debates about politics, or talk about politics at all. Instead, they built community centers, put up Christmas lights, and organized job training for young people.

This was not accidental. The literature in the fields of peacebuilding and conflict prevention overflows with words such as local and community-based and economic regeneration. It’s built on the idea that people should do something constructive—something that benefits everybody, lessens inequality, and makes people work alongside people they hate. That doesn’t mean they will then get to like one another, just that they are less likely to kill one another on the following day.

Aplebaum cites initiatives in countries such as Columbia, but admits it might be hard to invite to nonpartisan community efforts people who only open emails from “their own kind,” if you will. She also expects strong skepticism from readers. What incentive is there to try any of this? Some of these cultists are so far down the rabbit hole that they may never emerge and why bother trying: “let them learn to live with us.”

Still, nonpartisan activities such as rural food distribution have the advantage of meeting basic needs in a way that does not directly threaten recipients’ conservative views. Nonpartisan Indivisible Appalachian Ohio works on that model in southeast Ohio. Neighbors helping neighbors and, oh look, Ma, they don’t have tails or horns. Shifting people’s view of more progressive neighbors over time could shave Republican margins of victory, make Democrats more competititve in places they are not now, win back state legislatures, and slowly move true believers off the ledge.

The pro-Trump protesters who appeared at state capitols on Inauguration Day 2021 arrived in numbers countable on one hand, for the most part. The dozen or so who showed up in Phoenix brought secessionist flags. They may be few in number, yet still represent the larger minority of voters behind Trump who pose a threat to democracy so long as they remain Americans in name only.