Skip to content

Month: July 2021

Yes, it was an attempted coup. Even Mike Pence knew it.

Back in 2016, candidate Donald Trump made it very clear that as president he would not hesitate to order the military to torture prisoners. On March 3rd of that year, in a presidential primary debate, Fox News anchor Brett Baier noted that over 100 foreign policy experts had signed an open letter refusing to support him because his “expansive use of torture” is inexcusable, declaring that the military would refuse because they have been trained to refuse illegal orders.

Baier asked Trump, “so what would you do, as commander-in-chief, if the U.S. military refused to carry out those orders?”

“They won’t refuse,” Trump arrogantly replied. “They’re not going to refuse me. Believe me.”

He went on to rant about terrorists “chopping off heads” and how he would go beyond waterboarding, ending with this:

And — and — and — I’m a leader. I’m a leader. I’ve always been a leader. I’ve never had any problem leading people. If I say do it, they’re going to do it. That’s what leadership is all about.

He walked back his comment the next day with a perfunctory statement promising not to give an illegal order but it was clear that he was utterly ignorant of the president’s constitutional limits and saw himself as a would-be dictator. And throughout his presidency, he said over and over again that he had the power to do anything he chose, parroting what one of his flunkies told him about “Article II” of the constitution:

Nobody took him very seriously, to be sure, because it was ridiculous. And with the exception of regularly firing members of his administration, until the final year of his term, he tended to push the boundaries of his power mostly by breaking long-standing norms and corruptly abusing his office for political and financial gain which he did frequently. But as he faced re-election in the midst of the COVID pandemic, which he had no idea how to handle, and the humiliating prospect of losing re-election (along with the legal protections the office gave him) it’s clear that the people around him started to get worried that he was going to use his very robust and clearly delineated powers as Commander in Chief for political purposes.

It was perfectly legitimate for him to disagree with the Pentagon about policy and direct them to follow his orders despite their resistance. But he began to delve into areas of military justice and discipline, following the advice of Fox News pundits who convinced him that accused and convicted war criminals were being persecuted for doing the kind of dirty work Trump had advocated in his 2016 campaign. He intervened in one trial and pardoned some others. When the Navy tried to keep one of the accused from retaining his Navy Seal designation, Trump insisted he be allowed to keep it and the Navy Secretary was fired when he protested the interference.

In June of 2020, Trump was incensed by the George Floyd protests and was demanding that the active-duty military intervene to quell them. And it was at this point, according to several new books about the final year of the Trump administration, that the Joint Chiefs of Staff started to get nervous, particularly its chairman, General Mark Milley, who had been involved in the notorious clearing of Lafayette Square that culminated in Trump’s infamous photo-op with a Bible. Milley eventually publicly apologized for allowing himself to be used as a political prop. What we didn’t know until now was that the discussions that happened around those protests awakened the Pentagon leadership that Trump was becoming unhinged. As the presidential campaign heated up and they saw that he was setting the table to call the election illegitimate if he lost and contest the results regardless of the circumstances, they became alarmed. When Trump fired Esper the day after the election and installed some of his most notorious henchmen in the Pentagon, it’s safe to say that the top levels of the military’s hair were collectively on fire.

According to the latest book by Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig called “I Alone Can Fix It,” as the surreal post-election period dragged on with the administration refusing to cooperate in the transition and Trump becoming more and more desperate, Milley and the others apparently saw the potential for street clashes between Trump’s “brownshirts” (as he called them) and police leading to Trump declaring an insurrection and demanding the use of the active-duty military to step in. He seems to have feared this is what would lead to a “Reichstag Fire” moment in which Trump would somehow attempt to stay in power. He and the senior brass even put together a sort of “Saturday Night Massacre” style plan to resign one by one should Trump attempt it. They were all spooked by what they were seeing.

Clearly Milley has been cooperating with all these authors and has portrayed himself as a hero who saved the Republic which does seem overblown. And it’s very unnerving to see a general in this position, working with others to thwart the will of the civilian leadership. That is NOT how it’s supposed to work. In fact, it’s yet another very important norm that seems to have been broken and it’s a very important one. But Trump’s behavior in the post-election period has been insane by any measure and while he was still in office, he was listening to people like Michael Flynn who was telling him that he could declare martial law and the military could seize the voting machines and run new elections, so there is no doubt we are lucky this didn’t turn out a lot worse than it did.

And it wasn’t just Milley and brass who were paranoid about what was happening. In “I Alone Can Fix It” a chilling anecdote shows that Vice President Mike Pence was just as nervous.

On January 6th, his Secret Service detail wanted to drive him off the Capitol grounds and he refused saying to his top agent Tim Giebels, “I’m not getting in the car, Tim. I trust you, Tim, but you’re not driving the car. If I get in that vehicle, you guys are taking off. I’m not getting in the car.” The book goes on to describe the man in charge of the Secret Service’s movements telling Pence’s national security adviser, Gen. Keith Kellogg, they planned to move Pence to Joint Base Andrews. Kellogg told him not to do it saying, “he’s got a job to do. I know you guys too well. You’ll fly him to Alaska if you have a chance. Don’t do it.”

There are a number of ways to interpret that but MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace said on Thursday, “someone familiar with this reporting tells me that Pence feared a conspiracy. He feared that the Secret Service would aid Trump in his ultimate aims that day.” Considering everything that had been going on, all of which Pence was no doubt aware, that would not have been a ridiculous suspicion. After all, if they could have gotten Pence out of town they would have thwarted the certification of the electoral college vote at least for that day. Who knows what would have followed? (And what does this say about the Secret Service?)

We all saw a lot of this as it unfolded in real-time. And we certainly suspected that this sort of thing was happening behind the scenes. These accounts, no matter how self-serving they might be, show that whatever suspicions anyone had were more than justified. 

Salon

Enough with the patriotic BS

Forget all the flags and fireworks. Forget the solemn rhetoric in dulcet tones about blood shed and sacrifices made by our forbears to secure our freedom. Some of our countrymen’s conception of why American government exists is this and this alone: to profit themselves and their friends and to punish their enemies.

Michael A. Cohen (not the disbarred Trump lawyer) examines the effort to make Ashli Babbitt the Trumpist right’s Horst Wessel:

On Jan. 6, Ashli Babbitt, along with thousands of other supporters of former President Donald Trump, stormed into the U.S. Capitol. She tried to be the first in the mob to climb through broken glass in a door to the Speaker’s Lobby as members of Congress stood nearby. Instead, Babbitt was shot and killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer.

Now the former president who, during his time in office, politicized the courts, the media and our elections is doing the same with law enforcement by turning Babbitt into a political martyr.

As president, Trump regularly defended police officers when they used deadly force against Americans, and even encouraged them to do so. Be “rough,” he counseled the police. “Please don’t be too nice” when putting people into paddy wagons.

But with Babbitt, Trump has adopted a very different tone. She was an “innocent, wonderful, incredible woman,” he told Fox Business host and key Trump enabler Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. Last week, he said there was “no reason” for Babbitt to have been killed. Days before that, he sent an email to supporters asking, “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”

The name of the person who pulled the trigger has not made public. But considering Babbitt had marched on the Capitol in support of the former president’s lies about the 2020 election being stolen, Donald Trump is, arguably, the person most responsible for her death.

But this latest Trump tripe is more than just an attempt to whitewash the Jan. 6th insurrection Trump himself instigated.

The martyrdom of Babbitt suggests there should be a two-tiered justice system in Trump’s America: one where the police have carte blanche to use violence against his political enemies and the other where they must stand down when facing the fury of his supporters.

This is the Party of Trump’s conception of what government exists for, and not just its justice system. In its conception, the notion of using government to promote the “general welfare” (the phrase appears twice in the U.S. Constitution) is laughable. Parties elect legislators to profit themselves and their donors, to punish political rivals/enemies, and to keep undesirables in their places. It wasn’t always Republicans doing so, but it is predominantly Republicans doing so today.

It is why robber barons bought elections and masterminded wars.

It is why whites across the South overthrew Reconstruction governments and instituted Jim Crow. It is why whites rioted in Wilmington, massacred Blacks in the Greenwood District of Tulsa, and lynched thousands of others for decades.

It is why there are 12,000 lobbyists in Washington, D.C. spending nearly a billion dollars each year: to secure government largesse for their clients, to keep federal regulators at bay, and to keep tax rules they like advatageous and those they don’t unenforced.

It is why Republican legislatures this very day are advancing hundreds of laws to secure the blessings of power and money for themselves and their donor-friends, to limit the vote to ensure only the right people’s voices (their supporters) are heard and their needs addressed, and as always, to keep undesirables in their places, whatever their color.

It is why high-ranking military officials feared the former president might try to use federal troops to affect a coup in January. Because in Trump’s mind and in the minds of his closest supporters that is what goverment is for, to profit themselves and their friends and to punish their enemies.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is a loser, thinks Trump. Naturally, he and his supporters believe their political rivals think the same way and will act on that. Projection and paranoia. It’s always projection and paranoia.

Flood porn

No climate change to see here. Swim along.

Germany

“The suffering keeps increasing. Our country has never seen anything like it,” says German politician.

Belgium

Uganda

United States (Arizona)

https://twitter.com/BenDWalsh/status/1415848713629667330?s=20

India (earlier this week)

England (earlier this week)

https://twitter.com/HeartLondonNews/status/1414640901184540673?s=20

Previews of coming attractions?

Stars made of garbage

Somebody had a normal one:

Aaaaand, he doesn’t know what a coup is:

He is very, very stupid.

A mass-casualty event, happening in slow motion

This is so infuriating it makes me wish I could get on Richard Branson’s vanity space ship and just keep going:

The worst of the pandemic seemed behind Mercy Hospital, those weeks last winter when the coronavirus wards were full of people struggling to breathe.

But after months of reprieve, the virus has come roaring back, sending unvaccinated young adults and middle-aged patients from across southwest Missouri there in droves as the highly transmissible delta variant tears through the region. The hospital has been treating more than 130 covid-19 patients each day since Sunday — more than the winter surge — and had to open a sixth ward. It came close to running out of ventilators earlier this month.

“We’re just very disheartened. Thiget on Richard branson’s s was all pretty avoidable,” said Wanda Brown, a nurse unit manager. “Last year, we were looking forward to the vaccine coming out because we really thought that that was going to be helpful for our community. We feel like we’ve taken giant leaps backward.”

Springfield, a city of 170,000 nestled in the Ozarks, has become a cautionary tale for how the more transmissible delta variant, now estimated to account for half of all new cases nationwide, can ravage poorly vaccinated communities and return them to the darkest days of the pandemic.

Missouri has reported one of thenation’s highest per capita increases in new coronavirus cases in recent weeks. Freeman Health System in Joplin, about 70 miles west of Springfield, announced the full reopening of its covid-19 ward in late June after downsizing in the spring because of a lack of patients. The delta variant has been linked to a broader regional outbreak spilling into Arkansas and Oklahoma, as well as emerging hot spots in Louisiana, Florida, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. Cases and hospitalizations are strongly correlated with low vaccination rates, according to a Washington Post analysis.

Nationally, the coronavirus case rate has more than doubled since late June. The national vaccination rate has settled at close to 500,000 doses per day, one-sixth of the more than 3 million per day in mid-April.

Experts fear that the surge in Springfield, known as the birthplace of Bass Pro Shops and Andy’s Frozen Custard, is a harbinger of tensions to come as people play down the pandemic and refuse to get vaccinated even in the face of overwhelmed hospitals and preventable death. Instead of unifying the community, the surge has hardened divisions, unleashing anger from health-care workers fed up with vaccine misinformation and exposing deep antipathy toward the public health establishment.

New infections are rapidly rising to levels not seen since early January, prompting the school system to reinstate a mask mandate for summer school. Almost every virus sample sequenced in June turned out to be the delta variant, which is significantly more transmissible than the strain that first arrived in the United States. Local health officials are trying to create an alternate care site for stable covid-19 patients as Wednesday’s 231 hospitalizations are on the verge of an all-time peak and are projected to surge beyond available capacity.

Coronavirus deaths in Greene County, where Springfield is located, had plunged this spring, but 23 people have succumbed since June 21. All but one were unvaccinated.The fire chief described the outbreak as a “mass-casualty event, happening in slow-motion.”

This would not be happening if it weren’t for right wing misinformation and the mistrust in science promoted by hucksters and extremists who are killing people. It’s a tragedy for all the kids and other people who can’t be vaccinated for one reason or another and the health care workers who have to take care of the deluded, obstinate, ignorant people who don’t have enough sense to save their own lives and the lives of their loved ones.

Pence thought Trump would do him harm

This new book by Leonnig and Dawsey is really something. Nicolle Wallace read this portion of the book:

At 2:26, after a team of agents scouted a safe path to ensure the Pences would not encounter trouble, Giebels and the rest of Pence’s detail guided them down a staircase to a secure subterranean area that rioters couldn’t reach, where the vice president’s armored limousine awaited. Giebels asked Pence to get in one of the vehicles. “We can hold here,” he said.

“I’m not getting in the car, Tim,” Pence replied. “I trust you, Tim, but you’re not driving the car. If I get in that vehicle, you guys are taking off. I’m not getting in the car.”

The Pences then made their way to a secure underground area to wait out the riot.

And then she said this:

Someone familiar with this reporting tells me that Pence feared a conspiracy. He feared that the Secret Service would aid Trump in his ultimate aims that day.

Holy shit …

Grim Reaper taking a nap?

Doubtful:

Something strange is happening in Washington: Mitch McConnell might go along with a central piece of Joe Biden’s agenda.

The self-appointed “Grim Reaper” of the Senate, a minority leader who said just two months ago that “100% of my focus is on standing up to this administration,” has been remarkably circumspect about the Senate’s bipartisan infrastructure deal. He’s privately telling his members to separate that effort from Democrats’ party-line $3.5 trillion spending plan and publicly observed there’s a “decent” chance for its success.

Other than questioning its financing, McConnell has aired little criticism of the bipartisan agreement to fund roads, bridges and other physical infrastructure, even as he panned Democrats’ separate spending plans on Wednesday as “wildly out of proportion” given the nation’s inflation rate.

His cautious approach to a top Biden priority reflects the divide among Senate Republicans over whether to collaborate with Democrats on part of the president’s spending plans while fighting tooth and nail on the rest. Many Democrats predict McConnell will kill the agreement after stringing talks out for weeks, but the current infrastructure talks are particularly sensitive for the GOP leader because one of his close allies, Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, is the senior Republican negotiator.

McConnell is aware of the conventional wisdom that he will ultimately knife the deal and is taking pains not to become the face of its opposition.

“He usually is the brunt of the demonization of the other side,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), another McConnell confidant. “I don’t think he is Dr. No when it comes to all legislation.”

The Kentucky Republican is also perceptive of moments when his power is limited, evidenced by his 2013 decision to oppose — but not try to defeat — his members’ immigration compromise with Democrats. He’s also sent emissaries out in the past to engage with Democrats on health care and the deficit, efforts that eventually failed.

Even Democrats who’ve harshly criticized McConnell notice a shift in tactics in recent weeks. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said the Republican leader’s strategy “feels different” this time around.

“His problem is that many of his members like what’s in it,” Murphy said. “McConnell is going to have a hard time keeping his caucus together if he decides to oppose it.”

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who helped negotiate the bipartisan framework, was skeptical that McConnell would sink it, given that Democrats could simply then fold the failed cross-aisle deal into their larger partisan package.

“I don’t think it would be smart for him to do that, so I don’t think he will,” Tester said. “It’s better for them to pass the bipartisan bill and let the Democrats fight it out on the $3.5 trillion bill.”

For all those who thought it was a mistake to do the two infrastructure bills in tandem…

McConnell has been bragging about all the bacon they brought home in the COVID Relief bill. He clearly knows that people back in Kentucky are liking that and he wants his endangered Senators to have a piece of that before 2022. Alsok, it may very well be true that he can’t do anything about it. He failed to repeal Obamacare when he had the chance, arguably the most hotly contested issue of the Obama era. So yeah, it might just pass.

But I’ll believe it when I see it …

Bravery

Techniques to calm a scared cat.

No shit, General Milley:

In the waning weeks of Donald Trump’s term, the country’s top military leader repeatedly worried about what the president might do to maintain power after losing reelection, comparing his rhetoric to Adolf Hitler’s during the rise of Nazi Germany and asking confidants whether a coup was forthcoming, according to a new book by two Washington Post reporters.

As Trump ceaselessly pushed false claims about the 2020 presidential election, Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, grew more and more nervous, telling aides he feared that the president and his acolytes might attempt to use the military to stay in office, Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker report in “I Alone Can Fix It: Donald J. Trump’s Catastrophic Final Year.”

Milley described “a stomach-churning” feeling as he listened to Trump’s untrue complaints of election fraud, drawing a comparison to the 1933 attack on Germany’s parliament building that Hitler used as a pretext to establish a Nazi dictatorship.

And what, exactly, prevented Milley from saying anything publicly at the time?

When both players (Bolton, Milley) AND those empowered to report on them (Woodward) know there are existential threats to their country but decide “I’ll just save it for the book” — well, welcome to January 6 and worse.

Trumpism, like Hitlerism, can only succeed because people who are in a position to do something when it could make a difference, won’t.

“If I did a coup…”

I have very mixed emotions about these comments about Trump and a coup by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff because I really worry about civilian control and this was a very dicey situation that exposes some serious dangers. (But then, what didn’t during the Trump administration?) Everything Trump did was a destabilizing and threatening.

And as Parker Molloy points out in this tweet thread, there was a whole lot of weird stuff going on that made a lot of us lose sleep at night during that period:

Trump weighs in with a lengthy statement about General Milley: “Sorry to inform you, but an Election is my form of ‘coup,’ and if I was going to do a coup, one of the last people I would want to do it with is General Mark Milley”

1. Lost the election by a pretty sizable margin despite efforts to sabotage the USPS
2. Spent the time between election and certification trying to strongarm officials into changing the vote totals
3. Tried to recruit “alternate” electors to override the states’ votes

4. Installed loyalists at DOD and State
5. Filed all manner of absurd lawsuits hoping that judges he appointed would award him the election in return
6. Called on his supporters to go to DC on 1/6 to urge Congress to throw out the votes

Coup. It was all part of a coup attempt.

It wasn’t just 1/6. It never was. And it wasn’t just Trump. It was the entire GOP. Why do you think so many were hesitant to say Biden won? Because they wanted to see if Trump’s coup attempt was successful.

It’s why you had people like Pompeo saying stuff like this AFTER TRUMP LOST: “There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration”

I’m sick of people downplaying this. “Oh, it was just tourists in the capitol. Big deal.” No, that wasn’t it. That wasn’t the scariest part. That was the last-ditch attempt to stop Congress from counting the EVs. The coup was everything that happened between the election and 1/20

THAT is why it’s beyond unsettling that so many of the Sunday shows keep inviting the people who refused to acknowledge Biden won on. They were part of it. They weren’t just trying to spare Trump hurt feelings, they were sitting back and seeing how it played out.

The safeguards *barely* held. And ever since the election, the GOP has been doing *everything it can* to ensure that next time they won’t hold. Too many in media still treat all of this like it’s totally normal. It’s not.

It’s absolutely infuriating to have been proven right at every turn just for the people who’ve been so consistently wrong to continue to be taken seriously and put on TV to insist that everyone’s overreacting.

Originally tweeted by Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) on July 15, 2021.

We got lucky. And we know now (and really, we knew then) that it was a close thing. I have serious doubts that out luck will hold out again if the Republicans are allowed to do this again. They have tasted the heady nectar of violence and illegitimate power. I’m afraid there will be no going back, at least not for a good while.

They live among us

With all the excitement over the new book in which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs compared Donald Trump to Hitler (among other things) I think this paragraph in the NY Times review of Michael Wolffe’s new book makes a very astute observation and asks the most serious question we have to ask about all of that:

One obvious question all this raises is: If Trump was so unrelievedly awful, not to mention dangerous, why were Wolff’s sources working for him? “In insider political circles,” Wolff writes, “almost all politicians are seen as difficult and even damaged people, necessarily tolerated in some civics class inversion because they were elected.” Over time the realization dawned that Trump was in a specially appalling category. After that, “You took it and put up with it and tried to make the best of it, not in spite of everything, but because this was what you did; this was the job you had.” Or you thought you could help by “keeping it from being so much worse than it otherwise might be.” Or you persuaded yourself that you were serving a larger cause, as in the case of Marc Short: “He detested the president but saw a tight-lipped tolerance, however painful, as the way to use Trump’s popularity to realize the conservative grail of remaking the federal courts and the federal bureaucracy.”

More than all this, though, the quality of Trump’s that best explains what happened is that he commands a vast, enthusiastically loyal following that may represent as much as a quarter of the voting public, or even more, and a majority of the people who vote in Republican primaries. Nobody holding an appointed position has this, and very few elected officials do either. Wolff says the people around Trump believed he had “magical properties,” based on “a genius sense of how to satisfy the audience.” Everyone knew from firsthand observation how incompetent a chief executive he was: “Beyond his immediate desires and pronouncements, there was no ability — or structure, or chain of command, or procedures, or expertise, or actual person to call — to make anything happen.” Therefore they assumed that his postelection lunacy would have no consequences, and that it was safe to avoid any public argument with the president that might arouse the Republican base. Essentially the only nefarious misdeed he was capable of pulling off was the one he did pull off, not entirely wittingly: the power to incite a violent, democracy-subverting mob of his devotees.

Trump’s election, his term in office and the manner of his departure have reawakened a dormant debate about the essential health of the American political system. Are there too many barriers in the way of voting? Is the public misinformed? Do billionaires and other elites control the system? Do the Electoral College and the way congressional representation is apportioned overempower underpopulated rural areas?

Wolff raises a more fundamental and frightening possibility: that the lesson of Trump is that in a democratic society, a malign and dangerous “crazy person,” especially one with a deep instinctive understanding of public opinion and the media, can become genuinely popular. Millions of Americans love Trump. As Wolff points out, after Jan. 6, his standing in the polls went up.

I think we already know this, don’t we? It’s really not about Trump at all. It’s about the people who worship him, isn’t it?

That frightens me much more than Donald Trump.