Skip to content

Broken Media Ecosystem

Watching the media’s clear anticipation of a rout in Virginia tonight clears up one thing. They have learned nothing over the past few years. Just because Glenn Younkin doesn’t trowel on orange make-up and tweet insults at everyone does not mean that he is a good guy. He is anything but. And he’s run a throw-back, “under the radar” racist dogwhistle campaign which, because he wears a fleece vest and was a member of the Carlyle Group, hence a “grown up.”

In the final hours of campaigning on Monday to become Virginia’s next governor, it was Glenn Youngkin offering an optimistic vision for the future while Terry McAuliffe delivered harsh warnings about ghosts of the past.

As the two men barnstormed across the state, the contrast in tone demonstrated their shifting fortunes in the highest-profile race on the ballot on Tuesday. Mr. McAuliffe, a longtime fixture of the Democratic establishment, was scrambling to prevent President Biden’s unpopularity, the gridlock in Washington and Mr. Youngkin’s effective weaponizing of racial issues in the public schools from dooming his bid for a second term as governor.

Within two paragraphs, he portrays Younkin as offering an “optimistic” vision while McAuliffe is harshly battling ghosts of the past and in the next writes that Youngkin has “successfully weaponised racial issues.”

I guess he thinks that’s an optimistic vision for the future?

This is where they fall down again and again. Reporters think they are writing horserace stories that are devoid of any point of view and show no reflection of values and morals but they do. And that attitude trickles down to the public whether they know it or not.

Greg Sargent took a look at the narratives in this race today and it’s really good:

With Virginia voters set to elect a governor, Republican Glenn Youngkin’s final messages are positively overflowing with sunny calls for unity. One closing ad features footage of African American families smiling and strolling as Youngkin piously claims his campaign has been about “parents who want a better education for their kids.”

It’s a repulsively cynical finale, after a campaign built heavily around stoking white grievance with attacks on phantom critical race theory in schools and torquing up the base by feeding Donald Trump’s lies about our election system.

But this duplicity has benefited from a hidden assist. For months, Youngkin and his allies have pumped that raw right-wing sewage directly into the minds of the GOP base, behind the backs of moderate swing voters, via a right-wing media network that has no rival on the Democratic side.

Democrats will have to reckon with this. Whether Democrat Terry McAuliffe wins or loses — it will be very close either way — this race highlights this lopsided communications imbalance with unique clarity.

The outcome will turn on several key factors. These include whether the deep-red western counties turn out; whether Youngkin can mitigate the suburban shift to Democrats; and how energized African Americans and suburbanites who are fully committed Democrats prove.

As Ron Brownstein notes, Virginia’s demographics make a supercharged base essential to making this work. So Youngkin has struck a balance between feeding Trumpist appeals to that base while sanding down their rough edges and combining this with a cheerful suburban dad vibe to poach back moderate suburbanites.

The right-wing media is likely playing a major role in making this viable. Consider critical race theory, or CRT.

Let’s acknowledge that Youngkin isn’t using CRT as just a base motivator. He campaigns on it in swingy areas, and this will be partly a referendum on whether the issue can lure back the suburbs.

But to focus only on that misses the full story. Youngkin and his allies have transmitted some of their most visceral and hallucinogenic versions of the anti-CRT demagoguery straight to the base via right-wing media.

Among these are Youngkin’s ugly falsehood that CRT has comprehensively infested Virginia’s school system, and his despicable lie that McAuliffe got the Justice Department to silence Virginia parents.

Indeed, Matt Gertz of Media Matters estimates that Fox News ran up to 100 segments on CRT in Virginia last spring, even though it isn’t taught in Virginia schools.

The Justice Department lie is particularly instructive: It’s a propagandistic recasting of the department’s efforts to protect education officials from violent threats. Cheerful suburban dad Youngkin is siding with the mob.

This is the right-wing politics of the moment. As Brian Beutler puts it:The background din of everyday life in America today is feral Trumpers screaming at, threatening, or assaulting people who enforce the democratically legitimate rules of our society: servers and flight-attendants enforcing masking or vaccination requirements; school-boards setting curricula for their districts; government officials counting votes and certifying elections.

This is a politics built around maximizing social and civic antagonism. Attacking CRT says that subversive leftists and liberals are in cahoots with educational bureaucrats to indoctrinate and emotionally torment your children.

This is an old story: Since the 1970s, right-wing groups have seen allegedly anti-patriotic, anti-Christian and overly sexualized material taught to schoolkids as a useful way to “harness grassroots protest.”

Youngkin’s ad dramatizing a mother upset about her kid’s assignment traffics in these culture-warring base tropes. Yet it airbrushes out the fact that the assignment was a Toni Morrison novel and the objectionable scenes were horrors of slavery, since such absurdities might alienate educated Whites.

Similarly, when Youngkin talks education to moderate voters, we get soft slogans like “parents matter” — helped, admittedly, by a bad McAuliffe gaffe — or claims that banning CRT is a prerequisite for unity.

The soft side of Youngkin’s focus on education may indeed poach back suburbanites, and he also ran as a moderate on other issues. If that works, Democrats must reckon with this. But the other half of the problem — the communications imbalance — also matters.

There’s more at the link. He points out that McAuliffe has uncharacteristically for a Democrat fought back opely on these attacks but wonders if it was enough to balance out the right wing media. He says, “in contrast to countless Fox segments on CRT, Democrats rely on more conventional news outlets to reach their voters.”

And as I pointed out above, the mainstream media is restorting to their old habits which inevitably also favor the Republicans simply through their inability to see (or care) when they are enabling those right wing memes.

Published inUncategorized