Skip to content

Month: November 2021

Yet Another Moral Stain

With all of the hoopla this past week over the off-year elections, President Biden’s foreign trip, and the ongoing drama on Capitol Hill, there was very little discussion of the latest chapter in one of the most important and horrific stories of our time.

The New York Times reported on an unprecedented sentencing hearing of a detainee held at Guantanamo Bay. It was the first time a prisoner detailed in public the torture he underwent at the hands of the U.S. government. There are no adequate words to describe the grotesque war crimes committed against this man. Times’ reporter Carol Rosenberg, who has covered the Guantanamo legal proceedings for many years now, vividly detailed the story of 41-year-old Majid Khan, a Pakistani citizen who graduated from a Baltimore high school and, as a lost young man, took a trip back to his home country in 2002 after his mother died. There he was seduced into joining a terrorist organization. As he put it, “I went willingly to Al Qaeda. I was stupid, so incredibly stupid. But they promised to relieve my pain and purify my sins. They promised to redeem me, and I believed them.”

Khan was captured by American forces in 2003 and has been held in legal limbo ever since, despite the fact that he cooperated from the beginning. But according to his testimony, the more he cooperated, the more he was tortured. As with so many other victims of the brutal U.S. torture regime, Khan was compelled to make up tales in order to get the torture to stop. When his tales didn’t pan out, he was tortured some more.

The maze of national security restrictions put on Guantanamo prisoners attempting to defend themselves (an almost 20-year long process) has generally made it impossible for them to speak out about what happened to them. But apparently, (it isn’t clear from the reporting) Khan’s lawyers found a way for him to publicly detail the torture he endured without specifically accusing any individuals. So last week, in open court, he took the stand and expressed remorse for his actions and forgave his tormentors. In front of his horrified father and sister, both of whom are American citizens, he laid out for the record what happened to him.

Kahn described in detail the primitive conditions in which he was held: naked, with his hands chained above his head or shackled to the wall crouching “like a dog,” beaten and sleep-deprived to the point of hallucination. He was waterboarded repeatedly and nearly drowned. And then there was the sexual and “medical” sadism, as Rosenberg reports:

[A]fter he refused to eat, his captors “infused” a purée of his lunch through his anus. The C.I.A. called it rectal refeeding. Mr. Khan called it rape.

The C.I.A. pumped water up the rectum of prisoners who would not follow a command to drink. Mr. Khan said this was done to him with “green garden hoses.”

“They connected one end to the faucet, put the other in my rectum and they turned on the water,” he said, adding that he lost control of his bowels after those episodes and, to this day, has hemorrhoids.

He spoke about failed and sadistic responses to his hunger strikes and other acts of rebellion. Medics would roughly insert a feeding tube up his nose and down his throat. He would try to bite it off and, in at least one instance, he said, a C.I.A. officer used a plunger to force food inside his stomach, a technique that caused stomach cramps and diarrhea.

When CIA officers transferred Khan from one black site to another, they would insert an enema and then duct tape a diaper on him so he wouldn’t have to be taken to the bathroom. 

Kahn was eventually charged with four terrorism charges and pled guilty to delivering $50,000 from Pakistan to an Al Qaeda affiliate in early 2003 that was traced to the bombing of a Marriott hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia. At the time of the bombing, Kahn was already in custody. He also worked with Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the 9/11 mastermind, in some failed plots during his brief period with al Qaeda.

At his trial, the lead prosecutor conceded that Kahn got “extremely rough” treatment but told the jury he was lucky to be alive when the victims of al Qaeda are not. Kahn’s lawyer said “Majid was raped at the hands of the U.S. government. He told them everything from the beginning.”

The jury of eight military officers was required to hand down a sentence of 25 to 40 years. They gave him 26 years beginning from his guilty plea in 2012. But in an unexpected twist, obviously moved by the testimony, seven of the eight jurors wrote a letter to the overseer of military commissions asking him to grant Kahn clemency. They did not know of a secret deal that was struck earlier this year with the Pentagon in which the sentence could actually end early next year and no later than February 2025 because Khan turned government cooperator upon pleading guilty.

Some of the details of these monstrous tactics were known already due to the “executive summary” of the classified Senate Torture Report that the Obama administration ensured would be withheld from the public. You may recall that the Senate Intelligence Committee and the CIA were at each other’s throats over that project with the CIA issuing criminal referrals against Senate staffers and the committee accusing the CIA of penetrating its computers. (As it turned out, the Inspector General found that the CIA was wrong on both of those issues and then CIA Director, John Brennan, was forced to apologize.) The Senate passed the McCain-Feinstein Anti-Torture Amendment, banning “enhanced interrogation techniques” the Bush administration’s Soviet-style euphemism for torture. But no one has ever been held accountable.

In 2018, Gina Haspel, who was involved in the CIA’s infamous destruction of CIA tapes that documented the practice and was personally involved in the torture of one terrorist suspect, became the head of the CIA under Donald Trump, the man who won the presidency in 2016 by declaring:

Would I approve waterboarding? You bet your ass I would — in a heartbeat, And I would approve more than that. Don’t kid yourself, folks. It works, okay? It works. Only a stupid person would say it doesn’t work.

Torture doesn’t work. And the use of it, as well as the cover-up by two administrations and the crude endorsement by a man who would be president, is one of the greatest moral stains on America’s reputation in its long history of moral stains. And this one happened on our watch.   

Salon

Change of strategy?

Ah, yes. The loss last night in Virginia is progressives’ fault. So say anonymous (likely centrist) Democrats Axios found (emphasis mine):

  • A senior aide to a New Jersey Democrat told Axios’ Alayna Treene it’s “insanely clear” the party must reorient “not on center-left or progressive goals,” but on “what gets real things done for families.”
  • A senior aide to another House Democratic moderate told Axios’ Hans Nichols that “it’s clear that passing a historic bipartisan infrastructure deal months ago would have energized President Biden’s numbers,” and that House progressives who stalled that vote had hurt McAuliffe.

Hmm? What’s unreal about childcare, expanded Medicare benefits, and lower drug prices? Don’t think about that too hard. It’s not supposed to make sense.

Think instead on this:

What are we going to do about that? Better messaging is not enough in places such as Wise County or Washington County. Democrats cannot compete if they don’t show up. The goal is not to win there but to shave Republican margins. But that’s not how statewide Democratic candidates run their campaigns. They focus money and resources where they can get the most bang for the buck: in large cities. Meanwhile, Democrats lost the House of Delegates where candidates are elected in local districts.

Those of you struggling in rural, red areas might want to join a national strategy Zoom conference on Saturday hosted by Iowan and former congressional candidate J.D. Scholten of RuralVote.org.

I’ve already spotlighted a local North Carolina organizer who chalked up wins in her rural county by energizing local Democrats. (Anderson Clayton tells me she’ll be speaking on Saturday.)

But here is another article highlighting rural efforts to shave those margins in Lyon County (pop. 25k) in southwest Minnesota. They were following advice in Jane Kleeb’s “Harvest the Vote: How Democrats Can Win Again in Rural America.” Kleeb is the Democratic chair in Nebraska and a Bernie Sanders ally.

They pitched their pop-ups at festivals, fairs and lawns all summer. Admittedly with mixed results. From Minnesota Reformer:  

“Where’s your All Lives Matter sign?” one man sneered as he walked by. Another woman paused and asked, “Can I ask you a question? Don’t all lives matter?”

Admittedly, we were not always successful in employing Kleeb’s strategies. Sometimes we couldn’t help ourselves and clapped back, “Until Black lives matter, no lives matter.”

At other times, the hostility of the conversation derailed the attempt to stick to our playbook. One visitor, upset about the idea of forgiving student loan debt, started knocking over items on our display table. Although the elderly couple staffing the tent tried to share their story by telling the man about their daughter’s experience with crippling student debt, his in-your-face intensity and physical aggression put them on the defensive. 

When he then tried to bring up his objections to Black Lives Matter, the couple simply responded, “Don’t think we’re going to agree on that one” and thanked him for stopping by. Sometimes the best strategy is just to end the conversation when it’s clear no common ground can be reached.

But we listened, and at times we did find common ground. When one man complained of “all the killings” happening, we guided the conversation towards the problem of gun violence and the need to reinstate a ban on assault weapons. Turns out he agreed with that — common ground found!

After engaging another man in a conversation about rising gas prices — which he initially blamed on Democrats and the Biden administration — he left with a parting handshake. 

Yes, there were a few successes like this. But the greatest success was not these few instances of finding common ground, but the overwhelmingly positive feedback we received from so many. 

The positive gestures and comments outnumbered the negative ones by a wide margin. For every negative gesture, there were ten positive: Friendly honks, waves, smiles and furtive thumbs-up signs from passersby. Sometimes they came from unexpected sources, like the big, friendly wave from the man driving a giant tractor flying the U.S. flag.

For every insult, there were ten positive comments, people who cheered and yelled, “I love you guys!” or “Those are our people!” or “Go Dems!” as we walked through parades. People came up to our tent and said, “Happy to see you here,” or just a quiet “Yes” as they walked by.

But the most frequent comment: Thank you. Thank you for doing this. Thank you for being here.

There are Democrats and Democrat-leaning voters out there. But they are demoralized and sometimes in hiding. They think they are alone. Democrats have to show up and show them they are not if they expect them to turn out and challenge the conservative majority.

In addressing use of yard signs in my webinars (yes, we all hate them), I mention two ways in which they can be useful.

Women in Georgia’s 6th District found out in the spring of 2017, seeing Jon OSSOFF signs in their red neighborhoods gave them a sense of empowerment and solidarity, and helped get them out their front doors and knocking on their neighbors’.

Doug Jones’ 2017 Senate campaign in Alabama insisted anyone who wanted a sign had to provide their name, address, phone number and email. They gave strict orders that signs go in their front yards and nowhere else. Their strategy was to give Republican neighbors who hadn’t voted for a Democrat in decades … the permission to. It may have worked.

Howard Dean’s 50-state plan was premised on the belief that Democrats cannot win where they don’t show up to play.

Symbiotic insanity

Winsome Sears, a conservative Republican, and Virginia’s next lieutenant governor,

During the Virginia vote-counting that former Gov. Terry McAuliffe lost Tuesday night to Trump-lite businessman, Republican Glenn Youngkin, Democratic strategist Max Burns noticed something right away:

https://twitter.com/themaxburns/status/1455696259428372480?s=20

Sane used to be a given among our leaders. We lampooned lunatic leaders in films such as Dr. Strangelove. We shuddered at tales that President Richard Nixon talked to pictures of past presidents, wept and asked Henry Kissinger to kneel and pray with him as his presidency imploded. We and Pentagon leaders worried that Donald Trump might deploy troops or launch a nuclear strike against someone in a bid to retain power.

Now we have this:

There were QAnon lunatics gathered Tuesday in Dallas to greet the arrival of JFK Jr. (decades dead) who would announce that Donald Trump is president again (or still):

One post from a widely followed QAnon social media account said that after Trump was reinstated as president, he would step down and JFK Jr. would become president. Then former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn would be appointed as his vice president and Trump would ultimately become the “king of kings,” according to Newsweek.

They were but a few hundred lunatics in country of 330 million. But this year too, perhaps eight thousand deluded cosplaytriots assaulted and ransacked the U.S. Capitol while hunting members of Congress. They believed a congenital liar’s allegations that the presidential election he lost by 7 million votes was stolen.

Before the press called the election for Youngkin and long before this morning’s pundits published columns, people speculated as to why Virginians chose an untested, Trumpist businessman to lead them. People blamed progressives in Congress; blamed Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema; blamed President Joe Biden for failing to deliver by now on his signature legislation; blamed Democrats (and McAuliffe) for sucking at messaging and not countering Younkin’s Critical Race Theory alarmism over a topic not taught in Virginia schools.

With all due respect to my friends in the messaging business, I’m not clear how better messaging by Democrats fixes this:

Or this:

Or this:

The Christian right has moved on from “name it and claim it” to “own it and rule it.” They are no longer being coy about it. They don’t want to govern. They want to rule.

Cliff Schecter speculated how things might have been different if Democrats went on the offensive instead of reacting to Republican messaging:

[What if] “we messaged their allowing kids to die in school/elderly to die in homes of COVID, their Q insanity/Couping, their utter corruption the way they treat imaginary issues like CRT being taught or real issues they bastardize beyond recognition like Benghazi?

“What if we held constant public hearings? Regular state and fed press confs? Constant social media, paid media, earned media. 3 messages, easy to remember, your narrative. Every individual message fitting under one of these 3? Ya know, like you’re taught in basic marketing classes?

“Why is this so hard for so many who’ve done this professionally for so long? Why is it so impossible for us to use FB as they do? Why won’t our funders build a messaging apparatus that can come close to combatting theirs? I don’t have answers.”

There are lots of reasons Democratic funders don’t. Most have to do with reluctance to invest in efforts that don’t produce immediate or short-term results. Conservative money men are the tortoises.

But Josh Holland offered a reason why better messaging itself won’t work. Having a better messaging is one thing. Delivering it to American voters is another. Holland is not the first to point this out:

The Republican Party does not have a messaging apparatus that Democrats don’t. Conservative millionaires and billionaires do. They built it over decades, and they use it relentlessly to infuse the Republican base with an increasingly fascist worldview that Republican leaders then adopt. The tail wags the dog.

In the case of Donald Trump, the relationship was symbiotic between right-wing fringe news outlets, social media platforms, and foreign adversaries intent on dissolving external reality to undermine democracy. But they are delivery vectors Republicans do not own as much as exploit year-round in ways Democratic funders fail to appreciate except during election season. Democrats’ penny-wise and pound-foolish reliance on traditional media to deliver their message (which needs a lot of improvement) leaves them dependent on referees the right has worked for decades to ensure any Democratic message goes first through a both-sides filter. Republicans deliver their messages directly into their followers’ brain stems.

Broken Media Ecosystem

Watching the media’s clear anticipation of a rout in Virginia tonight clears up one thing. They have learned nothing over the past few years. Just because Glenn Younkin doesn’t trowel on orange make-up and tweet insults at everyone does not mean that he is a good guy. He is anything but. And he’s run a throw-back, “under the radar” racist dogwhistle campaign which, because he wears a fleece vest and was a member of the Carlyle Group, hence a “grown up.”

In the final hours of campaigning on Monday to become Virginia’s next governor, it was Glenn Youngkin offering an optimistic vision for the future while Terry McAuliffe delivered harsh warnings about ghosts of the past.

As the two men barnstormed across the state, the contrast in tone demonstrated their shifting fortunes in the highest-profile race on the ballot on Tuesday. Mr. McAuliffe, a longtime fixture of the Democratic establishment, was scrambling to prevent President Biden’s unpopularity, the gridlock in Washington and Mr. Youngkin’s effective weaponizing of racial issues in the public schools from dooming his bid for a second term as governor.

Within two paragraphs, he portrays Younkin as offering an “optimistic” vision while McAuliffe is harshly battling ghosts of the past and in the next writes that Youngkin has “successfully weaponised racial issues.”

I guess he thinks that’s an optimistic vision for the future?

This is where they fall down again and again. Reporters think they are writing horserace stories that are devoid of any point of view and show no reflection of values and morals but they do. And that attitude trickles down to the public whether they know it or not.

Greg Sargent took a look at the narratives in this race today and it’s really good:

With Virginia voters set to elect a governor, Republican Glenn Youngkin’s final messages are positively overflowing with sunny calls for unity. One closing ad features footage of African American families smiling and strolling as Youngkin piously claims his campaign has been about “parents who want a better education for their kids.”

It’s a repulsively cynical finale, after a campaign built heavily around stoking white grievance with attacks on phantom critical race theory in schools and torquing up the base by feeding Donald Trump’s lies about our election system.

But this duplicity has benefited from a hidden assist. For months, Youngkin and his allies have pumped that raw right-wing sewage directly into the minds of the GOP base, behind the backs of moderate swing voters, via a right-wing media network that has no rival on the Democratic side.

Democrats will have to reckon with this. Whether Democrat Terry McAuliffe wins or loses — it will be very close either way — this race highlights this lopsided communications imbalance with unique clarity.

The outcome will turn on several key factors. These include whether the deep-red western counties turn out; whether Youngkin can mitigate the suburban shift to Democrats; and how energized African Americans and suburbanites who are fully committed Democrats prove.

As Ron Brownstein notes, Virginia’s demographics make a supercharged base essential to making this work. So Youngkin has struck a balance between feeding Trumpist appeals to that base while sanding down their rough edges and combining this with a cheerful suburban dad vibe to poach back moderate suburbanites.

The right-wing media is likely playing a major role in making this viable. Consider critical race theory, or CRT.

Let’s acknowledge that Youngkin isn’t using CRT as just a base motivator. He campaigns on it in swingy areas, and this will be partly a referendum on whether the issue can lure back the suburbs.

But to focus only on that misses the full story. Youngkin and his allies have transmitted some of their most visceral and hallucinogenic versions of the anti-CRT demagoguery straight to the base via right-wing media.

Among these are Youngkin’s ugly falsehood that CRT has comprehensively infested Virginia’s school system, and his despicable lie that McAuliffe got the Justice Department to silence Virginia parents.

Indeed, Matt Gertz of Media Matters estimates that Fox News ran up to 100 segments on CRT in Virginia last spring, even though it isn’t taught in Virginia schools.

The Justice Department lie is particularly instructive: It’s a propagandistic recasting of the department’s efforts to protect education officials from violent threats. Cheerful suburban dad Youngkin is siding with the mob.

This is the right-wing politics of the moment. As Brian Beutler puts it:The background din of everyday life in America today is feral Trumpers screaming at, threatening, or assaulting people who enforce the democratically legitimate rules of our society: servers and flight-attendants enforcing masking or vaccination requirements; school-boards setting curricula for their districts; government officials counting votes and certifying elections.

This is a politics built around maximizing social and civic antagonism. Attacking CRT says that subversive leftists and liberals are in cahoots with educational bureaucrats to indoctrinate and emotionally torment your children.

This is an old story: Since the 1970s, right-wing groups have seen allegedly anti-patriotic, anti-Christian and overly sexualized material taught to schoolkids as a useful way to “harness grassroots protest.”

Youngkin’s ad dramatizing a mother upset about her kid’s assignment traffics in these culture-warring base tropes. Yet it airbrushes out the fact that the assignment was a Toni Morrison novel and the objectionable scenes were horrors of slavery, since such absurdities might alienate educated Whites.

Similarly, when Youngkin talks education to moderate voters, we get soft slogans like “parents matter” — helped, admittedly, by a bad McAuliffe gaffe — or claims that banning CRT is a prerequisite for unity.

The soft side of Youngkin’s focus on education may indeed poach back suburbanites, and he also ran as a moderate on other issues. If that works, Democrats must reckon with this. But the other half of the problem — the communications imbalance — also matters.

There’s more at the link. He points out that McAuliffe has uncharacteristically for a Democrat fought back opely on these attacks but wonders if it was enough to balance out the right wing media. He says, “in contrast to countless Fox segments on CRT, Democrats rely on more conventional news outlets to reach their voters.”

And as I pointed out above, the mainstream media is restorting to their old habits which inevitably also favor the Republicans simply through their inability to see (or care) when they are enabling those right wing memes.

Q and John John

I just don’t know what to say:

Here at Dealey Plaza, where hundreds of QAnon supporters have gathered expecting JFK Jr to reveal himself where his father was assassinated. (JFK Jr. died in a plane crash in 1999.)

Crowd, including a group holding a Trump/Kennedy 2020 sign, breaks out into a rendition of the national anthem on the grassy knoll. A segment of QAnon followers believed JFK Jr — who has been dead for more than 20 years — would run on a ticket with Trump in 2020

Experts who have followed QAnon for years said even they were surprised by the turnout today in Dallas. “Frankly, I’m kind of shocked at how many people turned out for this,” @jaredlholt told me.

A pretty steady rainfall has driven a big part of the group to cover, but the lost hardcore QAnon adherents are still standing on the grassy knoll. Every few seconds, passing cars honk their horns over the Xs on the streets marking the spots where JFK was shot.

Taking shelter with a group of folks who seem to believe Trump will walk into the White House as president tomorrow morning

Amid heavy rain, and without any signs of JFK Jr, most of the group seems to have left the grassy knoll. But I’m hearing another gathering is planned for tonight’s Rolling Stones concert at the Cotton Bowl.

Originally tweeted by Michael Williams (@michaeldamianw) on November 2, 2021.

I guess this says it all…

Reconcile this. Please.

It’s very hard to sort out what is going on with the Reconciliation bill. It seems as though they have Sinema on board although that could easily fall apart. Manchin’s little press conference yesterday seemed to indicate that he was a big fat no, but apparently he was trying to get the progressives to make a scene or something and when they stuck to their promise to vote on both bills he’s now backed off? Honestly, it’s hard to understand what the hell is going on.

Montana Senator Jon Tester had this to say:

The Montana Democrat told reporters yesterday evening that while he believes House progressives messed up by not passing BIF last week, “I think Joe made a mistake” by holding that vague press conference yesterday afternoon, in which the West Virginia senator clarified next to nothing about his position on the new, White House-approved reconciliation framework.

“I think that in this moment in time trust is a hard thing, and you don’t want to give people excuses to vote against the BIF or against reconciliation,” Tester said. “So let’s just get it done.”

“The American people are tired of the dithering,” he added.

I know I am. This is torture. An the sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be. Two Divas have turned this sausage into a disgusting pile of toxic, fetid, raw meat and it’s affecting the entire party. The right goes through this as well, of course. The Obamacare repeal failure is a good example, although the truth is that a whole lot of Republicans didn’t want that to succeed because they knew it would cause havoc in the electorate to suddenly withdraw health insurance from 20 million people. So they were secretly happy that McCain took the heat. When it comes to their most important priorities, tax cuts and judges, they hung together no matter what, even when the administration put up insanely unqualified hacks for lifetime appointments but there is no denying that Trump caused tremendous schisms in the party although in the end they always seem to come together to save him. So they are not immune.

But this Democratic sturm und drang over big programs is always destructive. Let’s hope it really is over soon.

Vigilantism For America

This rise of legalized vigilantism is one of the most disturbing aspects of Trumpist America. It’s been moving in that direction for a while. Think about “stand your ground” laws and “castle doctrine.” But lately they have been taking it to a new level with the Texas abortion law putting bounties on women who have abortions and legalizing vehicular manslaughter if someone “feels” in danger at a protest:

As the organizes of the fatal 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville are standing trial in a civil lawsuit, Republicans across the country are organizing to pass “hit and kill” bills that allow motorists to run down protesters.

On Monday, the Boston Globe reported on a “Back the Blue Act” signed by Iowa’s Republican governor, Kim Reynolds. The bill took the side of drivers who run over protesters. In June of 2020, the driver of Reynold’s state-issued Chevrolet Suburban struck a Des Moines Black Liberation Movement protester who was urging the governor to restore voting rights.

“Iowa is one of three states, along with Oklahoma and Florida, to enact laws this year giving drivers some degree of legal immunity if they use their vehicles to hurt protesters, part of a wave of ‘hit and kill’ bills introduced in 13 other states by Republican legislators since 2017. Most of those proposals came after one of the most sustained periods of demonstrations in US history following Floyd’s murder, and the effort to crack down on protesters has sent a chilling message to activists, who believe it will encourage violence against them,” the newspaper reported.

Nick Robinson, a senior legal adviser at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, warned it the new laws were “just a recipe for disaster.”

“There’s this kind of vigilantism that’s returning,” Robinson said. “If we deem these protesters to be rioters, we’re going to take the law into our own hands. And if that means injuring them with our vehicle or killing them with our vehicle, we have an expectation that the state will protect us.”

13 states have introduced these bills.

Meanwhile we have vigilante Kyle Rittenhouse going on trial in Wisconsin with the entire right wing screaming that he not only had a right to carry an AR-15 into a protest, uninvited and unnecessary, he had a right to use it because he “felt afraid” of the unarmed people he killed. If those drunk idiots in Missouri wielding guns outside their McMansion as peaceful protesters walked by had shot someone, I’m sure these same people would defend them for being “afraid.”

For all the talk about the left being “snowflakes” it’s the armed and dangerous right who are claiming self-defense because they are constantly afraid of unarmed people. In fact, they are so afraid they are getting in their cars and/or strapping on guns and going out and finding all those fearful people so they can kill them.

She’s just an old country parent

The first tough question she faces—how to teach about the historical fact of slavery, if you’re not allowed to focus on race—dumbfounds her.

“I’m a parent, not an educator.”

It’s literally the first question you’d have to ask if she actually got her way, and she has NOTHING.

It’s actually also the last tough question she faces.

Then, a total softball. And yet, another swing & miss! Asked why education has become such a flashpoint in politics, her answer is, “Don’t mess with our kids!”

Important question. And her answer was a bumper sticker.

I can’t imagine, from this conversation, thinking that this was someone I should talk to about education in this county. Much less this country.

Originally tweeted by David Waldman-1, of Yorktown LLC™ (@KagroX) on October 31, 2021.

When I was in the 8th grade, many moons ago, we spent the whole year in history class on the civil war. We learned a lot about battles and technology and geography. I wrote my big paper on the Lincoln-Douglas debates which are an interesting look at the political arguments around states rights (which my teacher insisted was the “real issue” in the war.) Someone did Fredrick Douglass which I recall being a bit more insightful (how could it not be) but it focused a lot on how Douglass was unique. (Remember, this was the 8th grade.) To the extent they talked about slavery at all, it was presented as an economic story. And Reconstruction was taught as a tale of con-men and grifters (carpetbaggers and scalawags) who descended upon the South to take advantage of the people for their own purposes. In other words, I was pretty much taught the Lost Cause myth.

This was not in Mississippi. It was in the Bay Area in California. I think a great many people were taught this “history” even up until recently and they believe as so many people do that if it was good enough for them it’s good enough for their kids. And that’s just sad. Their kids can handle the truth. They will learn valuable lessons about who we were and what we became, the good, the bad and the ugly which will give them a much richer and valuable understanding of who we are as country today. And maybe they will be able to move beyond this intractable racial divide.

But I suppose that’s the last thing they want. After all, this has all worked out very well for them.

One born every minute

Perhaps we should tell Trumpists that the vaccines contain Deceptifree, a compound that permits them to violate the commandment against bearing false witness without sinning. But first they would have to 1) care, and 2) recognize they are lying in the first place.

Naturally, if they are Newsmax readers they are already conditioned to being lied to. Especially by its White House “correspondent.”

SILENCE!

Conservatives’ view of what freedoms Americans should enjoy is often limited to their own. They’ll be devout supporters of the 2nd Amendment until Black men in large numbers begin arming themselves with AR-15s and .50 caliber sniper rifles.

Rights in conservative parlance are only absolute when they are theirs. For all others they are contingent.

Keith Olbermann in 2006 snarkily assessed that the Bush II administration had gutted the Bill of Rights except for the prohibition in Amendment 3 against “forced sleepovers at your house by soldiers.” The rest were abridgable whenever it pleased Republicans. That was 15 years ago.

Amanda Marcotte on Monday looked at Republicans’ selective protection of freedom of speech. Essentially, rule of law for thee but not for MAGA-me. Donald Trump’s new web service terms tells the tale. Pay close attention to what they perceive as freedom:

The national war on what has been misleadingly described as “critical race theory” in public schools is, in reality, of course, a right-wing attempt to censor any discussion of racism, historical or otherwise. This has been perfectly illustrated in the Virginia governor’s race, in which the GOP candidate, Glenn Youngkin, has been running ads calling for schools to censor materials that tell the historical truth about slavery. The ad, which features a woman telling a maudlin story about her son having “night terrors” from an assigned high school reading, is oblique about what book, exactly, Youngkin thinks should be censored. Of course, Youngkin is embarrassed to admit it because the answer is “Beloved,” a canonical novel by Nobel prize winner Toni Morrison. It’s not a mystery why conservatives want to censor this classic novel about the evils of racism. It’s for the same reason that Texas Republicans are circulating lists of other books to censor, the vast majority of which are about racism being bad or LGBTQ people being normal. As I noted in last week’s newsletter, this is the same fascist urge to suppress free thought that led to the Nazi book burnings, and there’s no reason to sugarcoat it or play the “can’t happen here” games. It can happen here, and is happening, as evidenced by a Republican running for statewide office on a pro-censorship platform in Virginia. 

Thus, freedom of speech acquires an even more contingent meaning than in Olbermann’s satire.

Just weeks ago, I referenced Christian Dominionists’ appropriation of patriot-adjacent words like liberty to mask a very different understanding from definitions in common use:

[Rachel] Tabachnick emphasized that when they use the word liberty, for example, they don’t use it in the Jeffersonian sense. Their concept is (in my crude understanding) liberty lies in following Jesus, Dominionist-style. Don’t be fooled by patriotic affectations. They mean to rule for Jesus while wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.

Marcotte provides more recent examples of Republicans’ selective defense of the 1st Amendment from Florida, from Texas, and from the many red states that “have basically legalized the use of cars as weapons for conservatives who wish to violently attack protesters, especially Black Lives Matter protesters.”

It’s freedom of speech for me but not for thee.

This week, the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse also begins. Rittenhouse is alleged to have shot three Black Lives Matter protesters last year, killing two. His case has become a cause célèbre on the right. Not that conservatives think Rittenhouse is innocent, really. It’s quite clear that he loaded up with bullets and went out to the protest looking for trouble. No, the situation — as with the laws legalizing car attacks on protesters — is quite clearly about reinforcing this authoritarian view that progressive speech should be suppressed, by any means necessary. 

Sure, “overeager leftists” sometimes harrass their own over “perceived and often inconsequential heresies,” Marcotte writes, but right-wing tumult over “cancel culture,” as Michael Hobbes argues, isn’t about real censorship as much as “exaggerated anxieties of older centrists who don’t like being yelled at by young people on Twitter.” The left is not censoring libraries or banning books or attempting to rewrite history or teach a false one.

“Mean tweets are but a faint shadow of the overt threat of censorship coming from the increasingly fascist right.” 

Don’t mistake the American flags and patriot cosplay for sincerity. Or as David Bromberg sings, “Don’t let the glasses fool you.”

That I’m a demon in disguise
You’re just a little bit behind all the rest somehow
I mean you miss all the hints that show the truth to the wise