Skip to content

Trump proclaims himself above the law

l’état, c’est moi

The judge isn’t having it:

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers asked a court on Wednesday to rule that he has “absolute immunity” from lawsuits related to the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Trump is appealing a February ruling by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta that the former president can be sued for damages stemming from the Jan. 6 attack, rejecting Trump’s claim of immunity because his actions that day were “plausibly words of incitement not protected by the First Amendment” or presidential immunity.

Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday asked the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the ruling, again arguing that Trump has “absolutely presidential immunity.”

“President Trump is shielded by absolute presidential immunity because his statements were on matters of public concern and therefore well within the scope of the robust absolute immunity afforded all presidents,” his lawyers said in a filing first flagged by Politico’s Josh Gerstein.

“No amount of hyperbole about the violence of January 6, 2021, provides a basis for this Court to carve out an exception to the constitutional separation of powers,” the brief added.

Trump faces civil lawsuits from Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., two Capitol Police officers and a group of House Democrats accusing him of inciting the insurrection.

Trump’s attorneys argued that impeachment is the only means to punish a president for his actions. The House impeached Trump for a second time after the riot but the Senate fell short of the threshold necessary for conviction in a 57-43 vote. The filing described the lawsuits following his impeachment as “harassment.”

It’s still Trump’s world and he runs it

“A Democratic-controlled House of Representatives already brought impeachment charges against President Trump for allegedly inciting an insurrection on January 6, 2021. Their effort failed, and President Trump was acquitted. These further lawsuits are an attempt to thwart that acquittal, and it is just this type of harassment that presidential immunity is meant to foreclose,” the brief says.

Mehta in his ruling determined that Trump’s false claims about a “stolen” election were not immune on separation of powers grounds.

“The President’s actions here do not relate to his duties of faithfully executing the laws, conducting foreign affairs, commanding the armed forces, or managing the Executive Branch,” he wrote. “They entirely concern his efforts to remain in office for a second term. These are unofficial acts.”

Thank God. If coup attempts are considered faithfully executing the laws we’re done.

But his attempt here is very revealing. If anyone had any doubts about his desire to return to the White House, this should clear it up.

Published inUncategorized