Skip to content

Month: October 2025

Summary Executions

Murder on the high seas

The New York City Bar Association issued a statement on Monday accusing Donald Trump of murder. His ordering of recent military strikes on four vessels in international waters in the Caribbean for allegedly carrying drugs to the U.S. amounts to “illegal summary executions – murders.”

From the statement’s introduction:

Although the President has, without proof, characterized the victims as “terrorists” and drug traffickers, that claim, even if true, provides no justification for these unlawful executions. Even if, as recently reported, the President has communicated to Congress that he has “determined” that the United States is in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, absent congressional authorization of these military actions, they remain unlawful.

Asked by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) in yesterday’s Senate oversight hearing to provide the legal justification for the attacks on Venezuelan vessels, Attorney General Pam Bondi refused.

“I’m not going to discuss any legal advice that my department may or may not have given or issued at the direction of the president on this matter,” Bondi told Coons.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in statements alleged that the boats carried illegal drugs bound for the U.S. The New York Times last week reported that in a confidential notice to Congress, Trump branded Venezuelan drug cartels terrorist organizations. Without proper congressional authorization, he then declared the U.S. is engaged in “armed conflict” against them as “unlawful combatants,” employing language associated with the law of armed conflict.

Except, the Bar statement argues (Law & Crime):

The association notes there is ample statutory authority under U.S. law to stop and detain alleged drug traffickers, but says the use of force in such a manner is not compatible with the U.S. Constitution.

“Article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution explicitly reserves to Congress the power to declare war, which over time has meant that Congress must authorize the use of military force,” the statement goes on. “The President serves as Commander-in-Chief, which authorizes him to command the use of force when authorized by Congress and in cases of actual self-defense. Because there has been no such authorization to use force against Venezuela or against ships operating in the area (or any plausible threats justifying self-defense), the President’s military actions against the Venezuelan vessels and their crews cannot be justified as an exercise of the President’s power to use force authorized by Congress.”

Without a War Powers Resolution from Congress, the attorney group states, each act by Trump “appears to be an unlawful summary execution prohibited by both U.S. and international law.”

The attacks “appear to violate our nation’s obligations under both the United Nations and OAS Charters,” the attorneys assert:

Attacking and intentionally killing the crews of private vessels because they are allegedly trafficking narcotics is an arbitrary deprivation of life and a clear violation of this universally accepted foundation of international law.

The president’s actions “are unlawful and must not be repeated,” the statement concludes. Congress must act to bring U.S. “into compliance with the Constitution and international law, reduce the risk of hostilities with neighboring countries and assure that similar abuses of Presidential power do not expand to American shores.”

Law & Crime notes a Bluesky post by Jameel Jaffer, the director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. The statement is “a big deal.”

It's a pretty big deal that the NYC Bar Association–one of the most prominent and respected bar associations in the country–is accusing the President of ordering the "unlawful summary execution," i.e. murder–of civilians in violation of US and international law. www.nycbar.org/press-releas…

Jameel Jaffer (@jameeljaffer.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T20:40:26.143Z

The New York City Bar Association has spoken out, bless them. Trump 2.0 , however, is an administration led by a convicted felon and already veering into dictatorship. Trump is bent on invoking the Insurrection Act to declare martial law. He has engaged in multiple violations of the Constitution.

“The White House is flouting a constitutional principle that every American kid learns at school: that Congress, not the president, has the power of the purse,” opines CNN’s Stephen Collinson.

Trump makes a mockery of the separation of powers and the authorities of the Legislative Branch. His attorney general yesterday heaped scorn on and launched prepared personal attacks on senators not of the president’s party. Oversight? This president will have none of it.

Trump has directed his Department of Justice to file frivolous prosecutions of his enemies, defied court orders, and filed meritless punitive personal lawsuits against perceived enemies. His administration has ignored a unanimous Supreme Court decision from last year prohibiting the use of government leverage to curb speech his administration dislikes. He makes a mockery of the Judicial Branch.

Trump’s recent actions violate Amendments 1, 4, 5, 10, and 14 with nary a whimper from the Republican-controlled Congress.

We owe the New York City Bar Association our thanks for speaking out. For all the good it will do.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Kristi Noem visits “War Ravaged” Portland

On Tuesday morning Oregon Governor Tina Kotek met with DHS Secretary Kristi Noem ahead of the ICE Portland visit.

Kotek met with Noem at a private jet hanger shortly after the Trump Cabinet member deplaned around noon at Portland International Airport.

by Zane Sparling | The Oregonian/OregonLive

I think it’s great for Noem to see Portland herself. I want Fox News to run video of her visiting to show Portland is NOT “burning to the ground” every day.

How do the people working for ICE and CBP see Portland? What do they write home on Telegram about their work? My friend Cliff Schecter intercepted one of their messages about being trapped in “War Ravaged” Portland

Dearest Ophelia,

I write to you from the gangrenous environs of “war-ravaged” Portland. I thought I had seen it all during my early days of service—Bosnia, Rwanda, Eric Trump’s gum line.

But this, my dear, is truly odious.

The filth is stomach-churning

Yes, this may be no Bowling Green Massacre. Or an escalator that has ceased ferrying one’s margarine exterior up 18 whole steps.

But, I am a trifle discomfited by the many challenges we face on this Monday, 29th of September, anno Domini nosti Jesus Christi, 2025.

There are the shortages of gluten-free curry at Elephant’s Delicatessen the likes of which no-tarot reading could’ve predicted. So I must exist solely on a diet of artisanal nut cheeses, plant-based collagen and vegan honey.

Oh what have we done to deserve such a fate, Ophelia!

Jack has disappeared again, no doubt training with the ghost regimen known as Antifa.

Check out the piece, it’s funny and then subscribe to BlueAmp, I’ve been staying up to date on what is happening then suggesting methods, strategies and tactics to fight back behind the scenes, but it’s important to keep getting our stories and messages out there publicly and Cliff is doing a great job with posts and videos.

Last week I learned how the right wing has been flooding social media, YouTube and Google AI search with disinformation. One way to combat that is for us to share our work and our experts in as many places as possible. Yes, liking, sharing and commenting matters!

Lately I’ve been sharing fun images from Portland like The Anti-Fascist Frog.

How we fight in #Portland.Ridicule is working! #ICE & #CBP backed up! The frog finally jumped out of the slow heating pot!Thank you #AntiFascistFrog on TikTokwww.tiktok.com/@theantifasc… @thefarce.org @emptywheel.bsky.social @gottalaff.bsky.social @jim-stewartson.bsky.social

Spocko (@spocko.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T02:10:53.740Z

Cross Posted to Spocko’s Brain


Agit-prop For Dummies

Looks bad, right?

Well:

[T] image was not a photograph of a real event in Portland, but instead a fabrication created by combining two photographs of scenes that unfolded in South America nearly a decade apart.

The image of the police officers comes from a photo of “South American riot police” that was uploaded to the Getty Images archive in 2008. A clear visual clue that the photograph was not taken in Portland was that the first officer’s shield is marked “Policia”, the Spanish or Portuguese word for police.

The description on the Getty website does not specify the country it was taken in, but another, similar image uploaded a few days later by the same photographer says that it was taken in Ecuador. The initials of an Ecuadorian police unit from that time are visible on a third photograph in the set.

The image of the fiery demonstration that the officers seem to float above in the composite shared by the Oregon Republican party turned out to be another image from the free archive site Pexels. It was taken by a Brazilian photographer in 2017.

The Oregon Republican Party explained that they’re bad “memers.”

If this was just a one-off, it wouldn’t be worth mentioning. But the visual propaganda that’s coming out of the DHS and the White House is beyond belief. Look at this:

A revival. Like it’s a religious ceremony.

That’s them talking about deportation raids like they’re hunting animals.

WTF are they talking about? “Nullification, secession, or rebellion?” In America right now? Well, I suppose they are right in one sense. They are nullifying the laws, seceding from the constitution and staging a rebellion against the rule of law. But that’s not what they’re talking about.

This propaganda is flooding social media all day, every day. It’s all over Fox News and the other right wing cable nets. It’s poisoning our society and I don’t think we are fully comprehending just how toxic this is and how much it’s affecting the public. The whole point is to bombard us with this crap relentlessly until it’s totally normal to have these masked, cos-playing, robo-cop, thugs roaming the streets and, even worse, to feel completely impotent to do anything about it.

This is your tax dollars at work, America.

Vought Said He Wanted To Cause Them Trauma

And so he is:

Axios reports:

Furloughed federal workers aren’t guaranteed compensation for their forced time off during the government shutdown, according to a draft White House memo described to Axios by three sources.

If the White House acts on that legal analysis, it would dramatically escalate President Trump‘s pressure on Senate Democrats to end the week-old shutdown by denying back pay to as many as 750,000 federal workers after the shutdown.

Trump wants the Democrats to back a continuing resolution to fund the government with no strings about healthcare subsidies attached.

  • “This would not have happened if Democrats voted for the clean CR,” a senior administration official said.

How can they do this? Well:

At issue is the ”Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019″ that Trump signed during the last government shutdown, which lasted a record 35 days.

  • Called GEFTA, the law has been widely interpreted as ensuring that furloughed workers automatically would be compensated after future shutdowns.
  • But the new White House memo from the Office of Management and Budget argues that GEFTA has been misconstrued or, in the words of one source, is “deficient” because it was amended nine days later, on Jan. 25, 2019.
  • “Does this law cover all these furloughed employees automatically? The conventional wisdom is: Yes, it does. Our view is: No, it doesn’t,” a senior White House official said.

The new OMB analysis is a major departure from the administration’s own guidance issued by the Council of Economic Advisers this month and the Office of Personnel Management last month. Both said furloughed workers should get automatic back pay after the shutdown.

  • “OMB is in charge,” a senior White House official said.

Yeah, we know.

The White House’s stance revolves around the law’s amended version, which added a phrase saying furloughed workers shall be compensated “subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse.” That’s a technical phrase for shutdown.

  • To the White House, that means money for those workers needs to be specifically appropriated by Congress. The joint resolution containing that amendment to the law specified that the U.S. government would pay “obligations incurred” during that 2019 shutdown.
  • “If it [GEFTA] was self-executing” in future shutdowns, “why did Congress do that? It’s precedent,” the White House official said, calling any other interpretation “ridiculous.”

[…]

The White House analysis of the law reflects the administration’s multipronged effort to make the shutdown unbearable for Democrats.

  • Federal workers overwhelmingly made campaign contributions to Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris last year, Trump Republicans note.
  • The furlough of hundreds of thousands of workers each day follows the administration’s widespread, DOGE-led cuts to the federal workforce earlier this year…

That’s what Trump was talking about this morning when he said:

So Congress can appropriate the money to pay them. But then Vought says the president can allocate money any way he wants. Nice little Catch-22 there.

This Was A Joke

Back in 2016, the Boston Globe ran this joke front page.

It’s so much worse.

*You have to love that it even caught the Nobel Prize bit.

Amerika 2025

It is now officially a banana republic.

I could go on but why bother? Our national leadership is sophomoric, stupid, crude and mean. They don’t even bother to pretend to be dignified adults anymore. Our world is run by shitposters.

Update —

The Guardian reports:

A Rutgers University professor is temporarily relocating to Europe as he grapples with threats that intensified after a student group affiliated with the organization founded by murdered conservative activist Charlie Kirk accused him of being “a prominent leader of the antifa movement on campus”.

Rutgers’ Turning Point USA chapter also says the presence of Mark Bray – whose work has closely examined antifascist movements – threatens them and is calling for his firing from the New Jersey university, prompting the academic to say those demands are little more than “manufactured outrage”.

“I am not now, nor have I ever been, part of any kind of antifascist or anti-racist organization – I just haven’t. I’m a professor,” Bray said on Monday about the circumstances. Noting that antifa is a decentralized movement, he added: “I’m a professor of the history of the left.”

A Change.org petition calling for the termination of Bray’s employment at Rutgers came Thursday, several weeks after Kirk – the founder of Turning Point USA – was shot to death by a sniper on 10 September.

Turning Point USA has chapters at various college campuses. And the treasurer for the chapter at Rutgers, student Megyn Doyle, told Fox News Digital that the petition was made necessary by the fact that Bray “puts conservative students at risk for antifa to come in”.

“You have a teacher that so often promotes political violence, especially in his book Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, which talks about militant fascism, which is on term with political violence,” Doyle said.

Bray countered that he is an antifascist “insofar as I don’t like fascism”. But he denied that he is a threat to conservative students

Coin Of The Realm

Contrary to popular belief, Julius Caesar was not the first living leader to put his portrait on a coin. A couple of others beat him to it, including Persia’s Darius the Great. But the Roman emperor was the first to break with tradition and distribute them to ensure his subjects understood that he possessed absolute power and, not incidentally, controlled the empire’s money supply. It was a savvy move, copied by monarchs and dictators across the world ever since. 

America has long followed suit, featuring the faces of our leaders on our currency, but with an important caveat: They had to be long out of power and in their graves. No monarchy or dictatorship for us; we were hostile to the idea of minting the portrait of a living leader for the very reason Caesar thought it was such a clever idea. Our Constitution meant to ensure that no one person in American life would ever have sole unlimited power. 

In 1877, Congress even passed a law prohibiting it, which says that “only the portrait of deceased individuals may occur on the United States currency and securities.” Even coins that will be minted for the 250th anniversary of the nation have a special section in the code which states, “No coin issued under this subsection may bear the image of a living former or current President, or of any deceased former President during the 2-year period following the date of the death of that President.”

But that was before we had our own Orange Caesar, who believes he can rule by fiat, supported by Republicans in Congress, and then allow the Supreme Court to sort it out, usually in his favor. 

On Oct. 3 it was reported that the Treasury has designed and prepared to mint a new $1 coin with President Donald Trump’s face in honor of the country’s 250th celebration in 2026. The founders would be so proud to know that we made it that far before we finally succumbed to tyranny.

The front of the coin will feature Trump in profile, with his trademark 1967 Las Vegas lounge act hairstyle delineated in fine detail. The back will depict the famous fist pump pose from his 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, along with the words “fight, fight, fight.” 

When images of the new coin were shared on X, U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach replied, “No fake news here. These first drafts honoring America’s 250th Birthday and @POTUS are real. Looking forward to sharing more soon, once the obstructionist shutdown of the United States government is over.” In true Trumpist fashion, there is every reason to believe the administration will go ahead and mint the coins. By the time it’s litigated, the money will already be in circulation — and that will be that.

This is hardly the most important example from the lengthy list of Trump’s abuses of power. But symbols matter, and this one cuts to the very heart of who he is — and what he fancies himself to be. An emperor or king who rules not by the consent of the governed, but by divine right.

This is hardly the most important example from the lengthy list of Trump’s abuses of power. But symbols matter, and this one cuts to the very heart of who he is — and what he fancies himself to be. An emperor or king who rules not by the consent of the governed, but by divine right. 

His princely ambitions are hardly new revelations; the signs are everywhere. Trump has decorated the White House to conjure his low-rent version of a European palace, complete with portraits of himself and gilded fixtures — that some intrepid internet sleuths suspect were sourced not from some continental antiques dealer but from the aisles of Home Depot. (As it turns out, there’s one just over three miles away from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.) Work has commenced on a $200 million, 90,000-square-foot ballroom, the first known new construction to expand the White House’s footprint since President Theodore Roosevelt had the West Wing added in 1902 and his successor, President William Howard Taft, doubled it in size. Trump has called himself “THE KING” on social media, and in February he even posted on X, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

This much is clear: The president has no respect for the American anti-monarchical tradition and style, and he seems to lack any real understanding that it’s our fundamental reason for being. 

The real problem, of course, is that Trump is abusing his power in a manner that is tearing this country apart. His despotic dismissals of the rule of law, in ways both large and small, are creating what many in the GOP have long fantasized: An imperial presidency. This Trumpist fulfillment is largely enabled by a supine Republican Congress and a Supreme Court that is seemingly eager to codify it. He is using every back door, loophole and extreme interpretation of the law to expand executive power and smother the system of checks and balances. And it’s working.

Federal troops are wreaking havoc in the streets, people are being abducted and sent to prison camps — or disappeared entirely — and the military is executing orders to murder foreign civilians on the high seas. The administration is slashing vital services, firing thousands of federal workers and using the power of the state to intimidate and blackmail private institutions from universities to law firms to corporations, and otherwise running roughshod over every aspect of American society. The world economy is dizzy from Trump’s incoherent tariff scheme, while at home he has seized the power of the purse from the Congress to spend the country’s money any way he chooses. He may even succeed in controlling the money supply and the economy if the Supreme Court signs off on it (and if he decides to abide by their decision). So far, little has stopped his quest for possessing the unfettered power of an anointed king. 

The recent state visit to the U.K. where Trump and his entourage once again behaved like crass tourists, actually exposed the plight of the real modern monarch. At the behest of the government seeking to appease the president’s need for flattery, the British royal family was forced to pretend they were happy to host yet another over-the-top extravaganza for a man who bragged he could have succeeded in seducing Prince William’s mother Diana before her death in 1997. On this visit — having taken the measure of the man in the past and realizing his need for the imperial treatment — they deployed the famed Irish and Scottish state coaches to treat Trump to a carriage procession through the grounds of Windsor Castle.

King Charles III and Queen Camilla didn’t do this because they wanted to. (Trump’s anti-climate change agenda is anathema to the famously green king, who reportedly raised the issue with the president both in private and during his remarks at the state banquet. Nevertheless, Charles apparently played “a critical role” in Trump’s shift in favor of Ukraine in its war with Russia, which he announced a few days after returning from the U.K.) The royals were used by the British government as props to curry favor with the man who has an unquenchable thirst for boot-licking from famous, wealthy people. That’s one of their jobs in 2025.

British currency still has the king’s face on it. But over there, long after successive monarchs surrendered their absolute power, it has come to represent tradition, national unity and stability. Over here, it means a return to the tyranny we once fought against. In a way, after 250 years, perhaps they won the war after all.

Salon

Oozing Contempt

Bondi testifies. “Testifies” in quotes

If you can watch AG Pam Bondi’s testimony, you have a stronger stomach than I.

She won’t answer questions, but responds with personal attacks.

instead of answering Durbin's questions, Bondi is attacking him

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-07T13:57:08.416Z

DURBIN: You won't even say whether you talked to the WH about this?BONDI: I'm not going to discuss any internal conversations with you D: They're going to transfer TX Guard troops to the state of Illinois. What's the rationale?B: I wish you loved Chicago as much as you hate President Trump

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-07T13:56:29.031Z

BONDI: The National Guard is on the way right now as we speak. You're sitting here grilling me and they're on their way to Chicago to keep your state safe.DURBIN: It's my job to grill you

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-07T13:59:09.015Z

WHITEHOUSE: How many suspicious activity reports did you investigate out of the hundreds related to accounts of Jeffrey Epstein?BONDI: I'm not sure if you're concerned, because you took money I believe from Reid Hoffman, if that's correctWHITEHOUSE: You seem to have looked at 0 of them

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-07T14:29:59.759Z

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Pattern Of Extreme Brutality

Welcome to The Dystopian States Of America

ICE agent chokeslams a protester.

Professional law enforcement does not behave this way. Not in a democratic republic. But then….

Videos confirm why Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker advised his citizens to know their rights, have their cell phones ready, and document everything done by “[DHS secretary Kristi] Noem’s thugs.” Calling them law enforcement is unjustified. Actual law enforcement professionals must be horrified. Citizens of Chicago filed suit (Axios):

A coalition of Chicago journalists, organizations and protesters sued President Trump and top administration officials over federal agents’ “pattern of extreme brutality” at a local Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility.

“Never in modern times has the federal government undermined bedrock constitutional protections on this scale,” their filing argues. “The individual acts of brutality by federal officers are too numerous to catalogue.”

The videos tell the tale. Watch this one carefully as this “law enforcement professional” chokeslams a protester.

In Chicago this weekend.Trump's thugs beat the hell out of this young guy who was just standing there.He is now in the hospital. The thug who beat him was doxxed by the female activist who Border Patrol shot on Saturday.He went from the scene of the shooting to this.@democrats.senate.gov

Denise Wheeler (@denisedwheeler.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T19:10:07.485Z

Is that taught in ICE training? How much training do these armed thugs receive? I ask jokingly if ICE trains its agents over Zoom or over the weekend. Did ICE recruit the man above over Craigslist, from the WWE, or from a prison gang?

Watch this pair of clownish “professionals” sloppily attempt (and fail) to abduct a Latino man near 63rd and Kostner in Chicago. Again, how are these men being trained, and for how long, before sent to the streets of our cities?

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Joy-Ann Reid (@joyannreid)

ICE tells Next 9NEWS that its agents are following their policies. Exactly what are those policies? What local police routinely behave this way where you live?

PBS News Hour examined ICE’s increasingly aggressive practices in Chicago:

“ICE acted like an invading army in our neighb’ds,” said state Rep. Lilian Jiménez, a Democrat. “These shameful & lawless actions are not only a violation of constit’l rights but of our most basic liberty: the right to live free from persecution and fear.”

ProPublica published a series of such videos at the end of July. The violence against what Trump dubbed “the enemy from within” has escalated since Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

“The assault has become increasingly brutal as Trump and his allies intensify their demonization of all things left of center, by which they often seem to mean anything to the left of the hard right,” writes Thomas Edsall.

Edsall asked political scientist Barbara Walter of the University of California-San Diego, author of  How Civil Wars Start,” what the end game is for Trump 2.0:

“Do you think Trump, Miller and other allies are hoping to provoke violence in order to justify further punitive or repressive policies?”

Her emailed reply: “The short answer is yes.”

The longer answer?

The biggest challenge that aspiring autocrats face is that their citizens still have rights, freedoms and real political power. In a functioning democracy, citizens can still vote their leaders out of office and there’s nothing a democratically elected leader can legally do about it. That’s why autocrats-in-waiting often look for ways to get rid of these constraints. They can rig elections, suppress opposition or, as history shows, manufacture a crisis that justifies emergency powers.

Provoking violence is a common way to do this.

Is it working? Walter:

The quickest way to piss people off is to send soldiers into their neighborhoods especially when there’s no reason for them to be there. It’s inherently provocative, and Trump and his team understand this. Research by the political scientist Robert Pape shows that the single most powerful predictor of suicide terrorism is the presence of foreign troops on local soil. People hate, hate, hate that. They hate the humiliation, the powerlessness, the feeling of being occupied.

BREAKING: Stephen Miller—both Trump Administration capo and de facto head of DHS, ICE, and DOJ, has just declared that peaceful protesters are "street terrorists." Under an executive order signed by Trump just days ago, that means he is saying that all protesters in America can be arrested on sight.

Seth Abramson (@sethabramson.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T23:35:17.675Z

Brace yourselves. Have your cell phones ready and document everything. If ever there is an investigation and prosecution over these events, videos will be needed. The scene of the crime is far more dispersed than it was on January 6, 2021.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Where Does It Go From Here?

CNN reports:

President Donald Trump suggested Monday he could invoke the Insurrection Act if courts continue to block deployments of troops to cities nationwide, raising the prospect of using the centuries-old law to bypass unfavorable rulings.

“So far it hasn’t been necessary, but we have an Insurrection Act for a reason,” he told reporters in the Oval Office. “If I had to enact it, I’d do that. If people were being killed, and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I do that.”

“I mean, I want to make sure that people aren’t killed. We have to make sure that our cities are safe,” he concluded.

First, people are being killed. By ICE. There have been several. But that’s fine. The ICE agents are sensitive men who need to hide their identities and they get frightened so they have to shoot people. So far, none of them have been seriously hurt. Protesters and immigrants? They’re being rousted and beaten all over the place.

But how about that new rationale that he can invoke it if the courts are holding them up?

I guess we knew that was coming.