The Teabag Cult

by digby

Here’s an interesting article by Johann Hari on the cultlike qualities of the right wing. He perceptively highlights the continuum between what we all saw during the Bush years and today, something which I wish more media would do because it’s very clarifying:

This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy-world isn’t new; it’s only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear Saddam Hussein had no Weapons of Mass Destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed, as one Republican congressman put it, that it was “the greatest hoax in human history”, and all the world’s climatologists were “liars”. The American media then presents itself as an umpire between “the rival sides”, as if they both had evidence behind them. It’s a shame, because there are some areas in which a conservative philosophy — reminding us of the limits of grand human schemes, and advising caution — could be a useful corrective. But that’s not these what so-called “conservatives” are providing: instead, they are pumping up a hysterical fantasy, that is only a thin skin covering raw economic interests and base prejudices. […]
Indeed, if you spend any time with American right-wingers — as I have, reporting undercover on events like the National Review cruise and the Christian Coalition Solidarity Tour of Israel — you soon find that your arguments don’t center on philosophy. You have to concentrate on correcting basic factual errors about the real world. They insist Europe has fallen to Islam, since Muslims immigrants are becoming a majority and are imposing sharia law. In reality, Muslims make up 3 percent of the population of Europe, and most of them oppose sharia law. They insist Franklin Roosevelt caused the Great Depression, and should have cut government spending. In reality, whenever he did cut spending — as he tried periodically throughout the 1930s — the economy began to tank. But explain this patiently — with a thousand sources — and they simply shriek that you are lying, and they know “in their heart” what is true. They insist gay marriage would cause the institution of the family to collapse. In reality, where it has already been introduced in Europe, heterosexual families continue just as before. On the list goes: evolution is a lie, a blastocyst is akin to a baby, torture produces actionable intelligence…

This fantasy/delusion is not a bug, it’s a feature, as Perlstein pointed out in his article this week-end. And those who think that it is something that can be appeased or dealt with in good faith are badly mistaken. After all, we have the primary Senate negotiator saying publicly that the health care reforms include euthanasia. If that has become something that’s “just part of the debate” even on theelite level.then we have gone even further into the looking glass than before.Hari continues:

Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has tried to conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has shamefully assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying that he “doesn’t want to kill Grandma.” Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them. His healthcare plan is weaker and harder to explain as a result. But this kind of mania can’t be co-opted: it can only by over-ruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people with the maddest fears. There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it. As Arianna Huffington put it, “It is as though, at the height of the civil rights movement, you thought you had to bring together Martin Luther King and George Wallace and make them agree. It’s not how change happens.”

But you can’t ignore then either. They share this society with us, are relatives and neighbors and there’s no getting away from them even if we wanted to. This problem has to be dealt with.

I might suggest that one place to start would be with the media, who persist in seeing the left as the crazy ones even though they’re right and giving the right props for behaving like animals because “it works.” Just saying.

.