Skip to content

15 search results for "Ron Johnson dumbest"

Dispatches from the crack-up

The dumbest man in the Senate Ron Johnson said:

Johnson said, “You got Leader McConnell voting not guilty, not to convict but then just providing a scathing speech on the floor of the Senate that does not reflect, I think, the majority of our conference. I haven’t done a whip check to find out what exactly how everybody thinks but you kinda put two and two together by their votes. So you’ve got our leader out there really representing himself and that is his right to do. But at the same time, he has to realize as our leader, what he says reflects on us. I didn’t particularly like it.”

Meanwhile:

The Lies and Insults on the record

The Washington Post added up all the lies — all 30,573 of them. That’s right, 30, 573.

You’ll notice the massive spike at the end of the year. His Big Lie was not only the worst lie he told, he told it a lot. But the most repeated lie is also a very important one:

“We also built the greatest economy in the history of the world…Powered by these policies, we built the greatest economy in the history of the world.”

FACT CHECK:

This is Trump’s favorite false claim, so there should be no surprise he said it twice in his farewell address. (In this database, we only count a falsehood once per venue.) By just about any key measure in the modern era, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson and Bill Clinton presided over stronger economic growth than Trump. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison with the postwar boom in the 1950s or the 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953. (After the novel coronavirus tanked the economy, Trump jacked up his claim even more, falsely saying it had been the greatest economy in the history of the world.) This marks the 493rd time that Trump used a variation of this line, meaning he said it on average every other day.

Republicans all repeated that bullshit lie as well and point to it as the greatest example of his great legacy. It is a lie. It should not be allowed to stand.

And then there are the insults. This New York Times list is just the twitter insults so it’s hardly comprehensive. He was insulting almost every time he spoke in public. Nonetheless, it’s quite a list and it goes on forever. Here are a couple of Republicans who came in for his nastiness:

Bob Corker FORMER U.S. SENATOR

“Liddle’ Bob,” “totally unelectable,” “Little Bob Corker,” “poll numbers TANKED when I wouldn’t endorse him,” “responsible for giving us the horrible Iran Nuclear Deal,” “Bob wanted to run and asked for my endorsement. I said NO and the game was over,” “had zero chance of being elected,” “Now act so hurt & wounded!” “helped President O give us the bad Iran Deal,” “couldn’t get elected dog catcher in Tennessee,” “dropped out of the race in Tennesse when I refused to endorse him,” “now is only negative on anything Trump,” “sad,” “lightweight,” “incompetent,” “doesn’t have a clue,” “liddle’ Bob Corker,” “set the U.S. way back,” “Liddle’ Bob,” “Was made to sound a fool,” “‘begged’ me to endorse him for re-election,” “I said ‘NO‘ and he dropped out,” “largely responsible for the horrendous Iran Deal!” “a negative voice,” “in the way of our great agenda,” “Didn’t have the guts to run!” “gave us the Iran Deal, & that’s about it,” “Strange,” “constantly asking me whether or not he should run again in ’18”

John Bolton FORMER TRUMP NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER

“one of the dumbest people in Washington,” “so stupid,” “one of the dumbest people in government,” “A sullen, dull and quiet guy,” “added nothing to National Security except, ‘Gee, let’s go to war’,” “illegally released much Classified Information,” “A real dope!”“Wacko,” “such a jerk!” “dumb warmonger,” “one of the dumbest people I’ve met in government and sadly, I’ve met plenty,” “with the exception of Hillary, by far the worst offender of them all!” “lowlife dummy,” “a war mongering fool,”“really dumb,” “Washed up Creepster,” “a lowlife who should be in jail,” “Crooked Hillary,” “was incapable of being Senate confirmed because he was considered a wacko,”“was not liked,” “turned out to be grossly incompetent,” “a liar,”“Wacko,” “was all washed up until I brought him back and gave him a chance,” “He likes dropping bombs on people, and killing them. Now he will have bombs dropped on him!”“Wacko,” “A disgruntled boring fool who only wanted to go to war,”“Never had a clue,” “was ostracized & happily dumped,” “What a dope!”“incompetent!” “Just trying to get even for firing him like the sick puppy he is!” “Wacko,” “stupid,” “dumb,”“set us back very badly with North Korea,” “was very publicly terminated,” “He said, not that it matters, NOTHING!” “couldn’t get approved for the Ambassador to the U.N. years ago, couldn’t get approved for anything since,” ““begged” me for a non Senate approved job,” “many more mistakes of judgement, gets fired because frankly, if I listened to him, we would be in World War Six by now,” “He was holding me back!”

What a leader, eh? I don’t have space to print all the insults he gave to Democrats. They are legion.

Having Trump off of twitter is a breath of fresh air. But this list makes it clear how much better off this country and the world would have been if he had never been on twitter at all.

Did the spooks make him hire Paul Manafort too??

Did the spooks make him hire Paul Manafort too?

by digby

He’s now openly pushing the conspiracy theory that the Intelligence Community set him up in 2016. This is what he’s been trying to get to from the beginning.

Here’s one of his allies (the dumbest man in the US Senate) pushing it on Meet the Press:

That’s right. They are going all-in on exonerating Russia 2016 and saying that the “real” interference” was from Ukraine on Clinton’s behalf. It’s full-blown alternate universe time.

I thought this thread from former FBI analyst Asha Rangappa explained the actual Ukraine connection pretty well:

Note the attempt to discredit investigation of Manafort in WH gaslighting. He was on the FBI’s radar for counterintelligence reasons WELL BEFORE Trump’s campaign ever started. He also has been CONVICTED of tax evasion, bank fraud, conspiracy, and witness tampering

Manafort previously worked for pro-Russian Ukrainian politician Victor Yanukovych, who had strong ties to Putin (and has since been deposed). showed up on Trump campaign’s doorstep willing to work for free — even though he was $19 m in debt to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska

While he was Trump’s campaign manager, Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates, were in contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, who is affiliated with Russian intelligence. We know from the Mueller Report that Manafort passed polling data from Trump campaign to Kilimnik

After he was arrested, Manafort *continued* to stay in contact with Kilimnik (this is where the witness tampering charges came from). He also violating court orders by continuing to ghost-write pro-Russian op-eds (propaganda) while on bail. Basically, he was still spying

Manafort was clearly a key person in Mueller’s investigation, which is why they wanted him to talk and kept piling on charges. Manafort appeared to be…but then we found out that he was lying to Mueller and that also Trump was potentially dangling pardons behind the scenes

So dude man goes to jail (for transgressions in what the judge called his “otherwise blameless life”🤔), never having spilled the beans on what he knows. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Fruity G was busy in Ukraine trying to discredit the people who helped expose him to FBI

And now we are at a place where Barr, the State Dept., and U.S. Senators are piling on, concocting a story that somehow Hillary Clinton (of course 🙄) was involved in getting Ukraine to provide info on Manafort, and this constituted “election interference.” Seriously.

To repeat, Manafort was under FBI investigation as EARLY AS 2014. Did the FBI and HRC have some crystal ball *two years before the election* that Trump was going to be the GOP candidate, and plot to take him down? Are these MAGIC GRITS???

Is the fact that Ukraine, or any other country, provide evidence to the FBI in a predicated counterintelligence or criminal investigation, which resulted in actual charges, trial by an impartial jury, and conviction, somehow unusual?? (Answer: No.)

Ask yourself whose interests are served by going down this crazycake theory. Manafort is Pooty’s friend. Manafort is super upset right now bc he kept his mouth shut thinking he’d get a pardon. Trump can’t pardon him without it having serious political liability. Do the math.

OK, apparently people aren’t good at math. Casting doubt on the basis of Manafort’s entire investigation, trying to displace blame for Russian election interference on Ukraine, and discrediting the people who helped the FBI in Ukraine gives cover for Trump to pardon Manafort.

She concludes by pointing out that this keeps Vladimir Putin happy and Manafort quiet.

You have to keep asking who benefits from this. Trump, of course. Mitch McConnell got his judges. But it’s also important to note that every single time, Russia benefits as well. Maybe it’s all a big coincidence.

I have to wonder if this isn’t something he and Vlad chatted about in their private conversations. I can certainly imagine Putin putting this in his head as the best way to cover up their collusion.

.

To hell with the dying “sad sacks”

To hell with the dying “sad sacks”

by digby

I don’t know how I missed this story from Sahil Kapur but it’s a beaut. It’s Senator Ron Johnson (vying for the title of dumbest senator) talking about the GOP’s greatest fear if the Supremes over turn the subsidies in King vs Burwell:

JOHNSON: Unfortunately, President Obama’s response to an adverse decision — in other words one that actually follows the law — would be really simple. Just a one-sentence bill allowing people’s subsidies to flow to federal exchanges and/or offer the governors, ‘Hey, we know you got those federal exchanges. Just sign the bottom line. We’ll make those established by the state.’ And of course, he’ll have the ads all racked up with the individuals that have benefited from Obamacare on the backs of the American taxpayer. He’ll have all those examples as well so…

WEBER: And the sad sack stories about who’s dying from what and why they can’t get their coverage.

JOHNSON: Right.

WEBER: Oh yeah.

Right. He’ll have all those examples of dying sad sacks who got their health insurance on the backs of Real Americans. Boo hoo hoo, amirite?

I love it when these guys put it right out there. He believes that the people who’ve received health care subsidies are a bunch of moochers who clearly don’t deserve to have health insurance. Now, I’m sure he will say that TORT REFORM! will solve everything and we’ll all be magically covered if only we can shop for policies in Malaysia or something, but his words give the whole thing away: “on the backs of the America taxpayer.” Apparently this fool doesn’t think that people who get subsidies pay taxes. They do, of course.

.

.

Party Of Hacks

by digby

I think it’s awfully nice of Jane to offer her hand in friendship to conservative writer Ramesh Ponnuru, don’t you? Clearly this upcoming book tour is going to be very difficult for him, what with all the questions about his sleazy rightwing publisher and the 24 year old plagiarist editor they assigned him. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone.

There is no word on whether Lil’ Benji Domenech is still editing away over at Regnery publishing, but it won’t make much difference. He’s just one of many GOP operatives given sinecures in the myriad conservative front groups out there. There’s always more where that came from.

But there’s no doubt that Regnery holds a special place in the organization. From Nicholas Confessore’s great article in TAP:

Regnery Publishing’s right-leaning corporate philosophy actually goes back to 1947, when the late Henry Regnery, Sr., set out to publish “good books,” as he wrote in the company’s first catalogue, “wherever we find them.” Works by Regnery’s friends among the nascent conservative intelligentsia soon followed, including Russell Kirk’s The Conservative Mind, William F. Buckley, Jr.’s God and Man at Yale, Whittaker Chambers’s Witness, and Barry Goldwater’s Conscience of a Conservative. Henry Regnery’s son, Alfred Regnery, who took over in 1986 and moved the company to Washington, D.C., has likewise been both a friend to and publisher of conservative authors. After stints in law school (where he roomed with American Conservative Union Chairman David Keene) and as college director of Young Americans for Freedom, Alfred Regnery was appointed head of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention by Ronald Reagan in 1983. While there, as reported by Murray Waas in The New Republic, he helped run Edwin Meese’s ill-fated President’s Commission on Pornography; disbursed generous grants to Jerry Falwell’s Liberty College, Meese pal George Nicholson, and professional antifeminist Phyllis Schlafly; authored, with then-Assistant Secretary of Education Gary Bauer, a much-ridiculed report called “Chaos in the Public Schools”; and in general cultivated an updated version of his father’s network of friends.

But by the time Alfred Regnery took over the family business, the firm had slipped into semi-dormancy. Regnery Publishing’s 1993 purchase by newsletter magnate Tom Phillips woke it up. Phillips, one of the Republican National Committee’s “Team 100” and a board member of the Claremont Institute, lavished both money and attention on his new acquisition. Leaving Alfred Regnery at the helm, Phillips folded the company into his Eagle Publishing division, an overtly political enterprise with a distinguished stable of conservative media: Human Events, a 56-year-old,ultra-right weekly newspaper; the Evans-Novak Political Report; the 75,000-member Conservative Book Club (founded in 1964 as “America was walking down Lyndon Johnson’s path to a socialist ‘Great Society'”); and a similar operation called the Christian Family Book Club. But perhaps most significant–given the central role direct mail has played in the conservative resurgence of recent decades–is Eagle’s list brokerage operation, which rents out Eagle’s own customer lists and those of organizations like Newt Gingrich’s GOPAC, Empower America, the Western Journalism Center, and the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation, not to mention Pat Buchanan’s American Cause and the Steve Forbes for President campaign.

By the time Phillips Publishing spun off Eagle last July, an entirely new entity had emerged: a company that treats publishing less as a media enterprise than as a form of political activism. With a new, almost Gingrichian sensibility, Regnery’s titles have begun to reflect the particular ideological and policy concerns of foundation-funded, third-wave conservative thinkers. Believe that the American family is in its death throes? Read Maggie Gallagher’s The Abolition of Marriage: How We Destroy Lasting Love. Worried that American higher education is overrun by radical feminists and licentious left-wingers? Pick up the late George Roche’s The Fall of the Ivory Tower: Government Funding, Corruption, and the Bankrupting of American Higher Education, or David Horowitz’s The Heterodoxy Handbook: How to Survive the PC Campus. Believe that corrupt teachers’ unions are the bane of the American education system? Read G. Gregory Moo’s Power Grab: How the National Education Association is Betraying Our Children. If you suspect that the Walt Disney Corporation is out to lead children astray with Miramax films and “Gay Day” at Disney World, have a look at Disney: The Mouse Betrayed, by Peter and Rochelle Schweizer. And if you wonder whether more assault rifles equals less crime, imbibe the pithy wisdom of Wayne LaPierre’s Guns, Crime, and Freedom.

[…]

Since 1996, Regnery has published no less than eight presidential exposés: Roger Morris’s Partners in Power: The Clintons and Their America, Bill Gertz’s Betrayal: How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security, Edward Timperlake and William C. Triplett’s Year of the Rat: How Bill Clinton Compromised U.S. Security for Chinese Cash, Ann Coulter’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard’s The Secret Life of Bill Clinton: The Unreported Stories, Gary Aldrich’s Unlimited Access: An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House, and R. Emmett Tyrrell’s The Impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton: A Political Docu-Drama and Boy Clinton: The Political Biography. To date, five of these books have made various best-seller lists.

For all intents and purposes, the eight are interchangeable–with each other and, stylistically, with most of the other political books in Regnery’s catalogue. Each posits a nebulous conspiracy centered around the Clinton White House, a murky stew that typically blends one or more of the following ingredients: shady banking and land deals loosely grouped under the “Whitewater” rubric; the murder–or induced suicide–of Vince Foster; Filegate and Travelgate; dalliances with prostitutes and nymphets; rampant drug use; treason via Chinese spies; and an Arkansas-based, Clinton-masterminded drug-smuggling outfit.

And yet these character assassins are considered mainstream and legitimate by the political establishment. I think we can we all see now why Lil’ Benji Domenech’s “credentials” as an “editor” are so absurd and why so many of us immediately understood him to be a cheap ideological shill for the Republican Party. Believe me, he didn’t get the job at the WaPo because he was a founder of Redstate. He got it because he worked for John Cornyn, National Review and Regnery publishing — all jobs that would have led someone with any sense of how modern politics operates to look, very, very, …. very carefully at his past work. These are not jobs that should have given anyone in mainstream journalism confidence in his abilities. It should have made them suspicious.

But I digress. Regnery is publishing Ramesh Ponnuru’s new book “The Party of Death” this next month. Check out what Amazon has to say about it. I’m sure you’ll find it compelling. Here’s a little taste:

Ponnuru’s shocking expose shows just how extreme the Party of Death has become as they seek to destroy every inconvenient life, demand fealty to their radical agenda, and punish anyone who defies them. But he also shows how the tide is turning, how the Party of Death can be defeated, and why its last victim might be the Democratic Party itself.

Ponnuru’s editor Lil’ Benji wrote similarly (there’s a surprise) on RedState not long ago:

Some still hope, legitimately or not: “There must be some common ground.” But there is none. No one can make that case any more, not with a straight face. We are past that point. The Party of Death won’t accept compromise, and neither will those who oppose the taking of innocent life.

That post entitled “Do not Mourn” is quite the diatribe. If I were Ramesh Ponnuru, I’d check it thoroughly. With Lil’ Benji’s proven proclivity for lifting others’ work, I might be concerned that while he was “editing” my book he may have “inadvertantly” absorbed some of my writings.

It would seem that both Domenech and Ponnuru are ardent believers in the sanctity of “life” however. (One wonders if they spent time together watching “the greatest pro-gun movie ever” where “they actually show the jackbooted communist thugs prying the guns from cold dead hands.“)

Now Ramesh, ever the “reasonable” conservative, claims that he never meant “The Party of Death” to apply to the Democratic party. He wrote on NRO recently:

Franke-Ruta mentions my forthcoming book The Party of Death, which she describes as a “book on Democrats.” The book does have quite a bit to say about the Democrats, and it’s tough on them. But the book is about more than that, and the title isn’t meant as a pejorative term for the Democrats. I explain, mostly in the introduction, what I mean and don’t mean by the phrase. I’m not saying this to complain about Franke-Ruta. It was nice of her to mention the book, and her assumption was an easy one to make, partly because the Amazon page on the book is a bit misleading. (I’ve tried to get Amazon to change it a few times.)

Thank goodness it isn’t a pejorative term for Democrats. That would be quite ugly. But it’s odd then that the cover that’s shown at the Regnery web site shows a book called: “The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life.” Is he describing some sort of social gathering where judges, Democrats and media all get together and “party?” Or does the phrase more logically describe The Democratic Party? Interestingly, there is an alternate book cover that shows “The Party of Death: The Assault on The Sanctity of Life.” Odd, don’t you think? Has Ponnuru had second thoughts about spending every day for months defending that slanderous, scurrilous title?

Of course, the one thing that hasn’t changed about the title is “The Party of Death” part and I think we can be fairly confident that he isn’t talking about a fun afternoon with balloons and a pony. Let’s hope he doesn’t persist with this line that it isn’t about the Democrats because he is insulting the intelligence of anyone over the age of ten. Even some mainstream pundits might find that hard to swallow.

And anyway, it takes some nerve calling the Democrats The Party Of Death when you support a party led by a man who said this:

From: “Devil May Care” by Tucker Carlson, Talk Magazine, September 1999, p. 106

“Bush’s brand of forthright tough-guy populism can be appealing, and it has played well in Texas. Yet occasionally there are flashes of meanness visible beneath it.

While driving back from the speech later that day, Bush mentions Karla Faye Tucker, a double murderer who was executed in Texas last year. In the weeks before the execution, Bush says, Bianca Jagger and a number of other protesters came to Austin to demand clemency for Tucker. ‘Did you meet with any of them?’ I ask.

Bush whips around and stares at me. ‘No, I didn’t meet with any of them,’ he snaps, as though I’ve just asked the dumbest, most offensive question ever posed. ‘I didn’t meet with Larry King either when he came down for it. I watched his interview with [Tucker], though. He asked her real difficult questions, like ‘What would you say to Governor Bush?’ ‘What was her answer?’ I wonder.

‘Please,’ Bush whimpers, his lips pursed in mock desperation, ‘don’t kill me.’

I must look shocked — ridiculing the pleas of a condemned prisoner who has since been executed seems odd and cruel, even for someone as militantly anticrime as Bush — because he immediately stops smirking.

Call me crazy but it seems to me that the man who personally (and casually) signed 157 death warrants and sent the nation to an unnecessary, bloody war of choice might just have a greater claim to lead a Party Of Death. Somehow all this fretting about blastocysts and spilled sperm just doesn’t have much resonance when you look at this:

I’ll be looking forward to many more posts about Ramesh Ponnuru and his sleazy publisher Regnery as he goes about his book tour over the next few months. I’m tired of this nonsense.

.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search: