Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Mayday! “This Is Not Over.”

Indivisible announces national strike

Saturday’s No Kings 3 rallies drew an estimated 8 million-plus Americans into the streets in a show of defiance against a rogue president who sets a lot of stock by bigness. Indivisible and a coalition of activists groups scheduled roughly 3,300 separate events in cities large and small from coast to coast, as well as others in a dozen countries. The last No Kings protest in October drew 7 million. If the numbers did not make it clear, the message to the needy malignant narcissist was, Donald Trump, WE DON’T LIKE YOU; GO AWAY.

The Guardian reports on the flagship event in Minneapolis-St. Paul where an estimated 200,000 gathered around the state capitol:

Bernie Sanders, the independent Vermont senator, riled up the crowd with remarks about the role of the ultra-rich in politics. Bruce Springsteen sang his song about the death and destruction brought by ICE to the state, Streets of Minneapolis, leading the crowd in chants of “Ice out now!”

The state’s governor, Tim Walz, introduced Springsteen, saying it was clear America needed “no damn kings” but it needed the Boss. Walz commended the state’s people for standing up for each other and for immigrants when Trump sent in thousands of federal agents, who killed Minneapolis residents Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Their names were featured heavily in No Kings protest signs in the city. Jane Fonda even read a statement from Good’s wife, Brenda.

Gov. Walz: Don't ever mistake our kindness for weakness. We demand justice for Renee Goode and Alex Pretti. We demand justice for every single person who was hurt or traumatized.

Indivisible ❌👑 (@handle.invalid) 2026-03-28T19:47:05.996Z

More than two-thirds of participants who RSVP’d for No Kings events were “outside of major urban centers”, including Republican-controlled areas and bellwether counties, said Leah Greenberg, co-founder of Indivisible, at a press conference on Thursday.

Indivisible’s Bluesky thread includes images from across the country.

Over eight million Americans took to the streets today, which makes No Kings 3 the biggest single day of protest in the history of our country. #NoKings

Indivisible ❌👑 (@indivisible.org) 2026-03-29T00:35:05.691Z

The New York Times reports that Trump’s brutal, rights-violating crackdown on immigrants in cities like Minneapolis was not the only motivator for Americans who took to the streets on Satrurday. The unprovoked war he launched against Iran on Feb. 28 has activated more younger voters:

One large rally was held across the street from the University of Iowa, where the youth outreach group Voters of Tomorrow signed students up to join its organizing efforts.

Katy Gates, 22, an organizer, said the crowd was “a lot younger, more diverse and more energetic” than those at previous “No Kings” demonstrations. She attributed the change, in part, to the war.

“Our generation has grown up with this idea of endless war in the Middle East,” Ms. Gates said. “And the idea of getting into yet another is something that people are rightfully really angry about.”

The protest downtown here in the Cesspool of Sin was estimated at about 11,000, making it larger than the 2017 Women’s March crowd. Significantly, past protests drew from all across the region and from Upstate South Carolina. On Saturday, however, there were other protests organized across the region, meaning the larger crowd likely attracted more locals than ever before. One neighbor told me last week that she and her husband planned to attend. She’d never been to a protest in her life. Her husband’s last protest was in Chicago, and he’d had to run from police.

More important than those rally numbers is what comes next. Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin speaking at the St. Paul rally announced the national strike Trump opponents have long sought (Raw Story):

“The next major national action of this movement is not just going to be another protest,” Levin said. “It is a tactical escalation… It is an economic show of force, inspired by Minnesota’s own day of truth and action.”

Levin then outlined what the event would entail.

“On May 1, on May Day, we are saying, ‘No business as usual,’” he said. “No work, no school, no shopping. We’re going to show up and say we’re putting workers over billionaires and kings.”

So what’s next after today’s historic No Kings Day protests?We’re glad you asked: nokings.org/whats-next #NoKings

Indivisible ❌👑 (@handle.invalid) 2026-03-28T23:26:31.370Z

The Achilles heel of these protests is that the energy they generate dissipates rapidly in the intervening months without sustained daily or weekly local actions. It will be interesting to learn how Indivisible and its partners plan to maintain Saturday’s momentum for the May Day national strike five weeks out. Presumably, they will piggyback on traditional May Day rallies. And fortunately, May Day this year falls on a Friday.

But even a noticeable, one-day “economic show of force” large enough to get significant attention won’t be enough. But, baby steps. Ladder of engagement. To be continued.

Update: Brian Tyler Cohen’s No Kings speech. Good message. Great energy. “This can’t stop here. This is not the destination. This is the on ramp.”

I’m not tired: A “No Kings” mixtape

Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made
And crowns for convoy put into his purse:
We would not die in that man’s company
That fears his fellowship to die with us

— from Henry V, by William Shakespeare

Five to one, baby, one in five:

OK-it wasn’t exactly the St. Crispin’s Day speech, but close enough.

On his MSNOW show this morning, Ali Velshi highlighted a fascinating bit of civil rights history, recounted in this PBS article:

Imagine climbing up 83 steps. Perhaps that doesn’t seem like such a big deal—but that’s likely because you’d be walking. What would you do, though, if you couldn’t?

That was the premise behind the Capitol Crawl, a now-iconic protest to demand the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ADA was a landmark civil rights bill aimed at providing basic amenities and protections to some 40 million mentally and physically disabled citizens. Today we take many of the ADA’s changes to society—curb cuts in sidewalks and closed captioning on entertainment, to name just two examples—for granted. But the act’s passage, in 1990, was anything but guaranteed.

By spring of that year, the ADA had been trapped in legislative limbo for months. Despite the strong support of then-President George H.W. Bush, the act was languishing in Congress, caught in the deliberations of House subcommittees. Many U.S. Representatives balked at the expense and complication posed by the ADA’s requirements.

Enter ADAPT—American Disabled for Accessible Public Transit—a grassroots disability rights organization that had been staging protests across the country even before its official founding in 1983. On March 12, 1990, ADAPT led a procession of more than 500 marchers, including other disability activists and lobbyists, from the White House to the west side of the U.S. Capitol. There, in the kind of guerrilla civic action for which the organization had become known, scores of marchers dropped to the ground and began the long journey up the hard marble stairs leading to the “People’s House.” They climbed backwards or on their hands and knees, step-by-painstaking-step. “As I’m seeing the people around me,” recalled Anita Cameron, one of the ADAPT activists who made her way up that day, “I’m like, ‘whoa, we are doing it. We are really doing it. We’re, like, crawling into history.’”

Rolled up in their pockets, protestors carried copies of the Declaration of Independence. Once they finally summitted the stairs, ADAPT reps delivered those scrolls to members of Congress as a reminder of the ADA’s importance. And while media coverage of the event wasn’t extensive, but the publicity that was garnered by the Crawl was impactful. “The pictures were striking,” said The New York Times several days later, “just as they were intended to be: Children paralyzed from the waist down crawling up the steps of the Capitol.” Six months later, following the bill’s now-remarkably swift passage through the House, President George H. W. Bush signed the ADA into law.

“We did it to show that we disabled people, as second class citizens, needed change. And the vehicle for how it was going to change was the ADA,” Cameron told American Experience, reflecting on the Capitol Crawl’s significance. “But I think a lot of people forget that the ADA was the floor. It was not the ceiling. So it was the beginning of rights for us, but it was not the end.”

One of the youngest participants in the Capitol Crawl was 8 year-old Jennifer Keelan:

(engage shame mode) For the life of me, I don’t remember hearing about this action at the time; Velshi’s retrospective today was my first awareness (and let me tell you-it certainly turned on the waterworks). How could I have missed it? It really bothered me; I turned it over in my mind. It wasn’t like I wasn’t aware of world events (I was working in radio…I announced news stories gathered off the AP wire as part of my weekday morning show, for god’s sake).

I contemplated further. In 1990, I was 34. Over the previous 2 years, I had shed 75 pounds, and had walked, jogged, biked and cross-country skied myself into the best physical shape of my adult life. So I wasn’t thinking twice about everyday physical activities like walking up and down stairs, stepping on or off curbs, or simply walking, for that matter. Consequently, like most able-bodied people, I didn’t stop and think about what it was like to be one of those folks who find such everyday physical activities a genuine challenge (if not insurmountable).

But nowadays, as I am “one of those folks” (stairs and curbs are a challenge, and I can’t walk far without some kind of assistive device)…I “get” it. Hence the waterworks when Ali Velshi ran the clip of Jennifer Keelan reaching that top step; I instantly grokked that it was thanks to the courage of activists like that little girl and her cohorts that I have the dedicated access to parking, transit and buildings that I take for granted as a (now) disabled person (pushing 70).

I also connected the dots between 88 year-old Jane Fonda and 8 year-old Jennifer Keelan:

They aren’t/weren’t too tired to keep pushing for change.

It’s in that spirit that I tip my hat to everyone hitting the streets today to exercise their First Amendment rights and (peacefully) push for change, and humbly offer this mixtape to perk them up should they feel…tired.

Bruce Springsteen – “Streets of Minneapolis”

Billy Bragg – “City of Heroes”

The Beatles – “Revolution

Frank Zappa – “Trouble Every Day”

Elvis Costello – “Night Rally”

Green Day – “American Idiot”

The Clash – “Clampdown”

Woody Guthrie – “All You Fascists Bound to Lose”

Bob Marley & the Wailers – “Get Up, Stand Up”

The Doors – “Five to One”

Graham Nash – “Chicago

The Style Council – “The Whole Point of No Return”

Tracy Chapman – “Talkin’ About a Revolution”

John Lennon – “Power to the People”

Sly & the Family Stone – “Stand!”

Heaven 17 – “(We Don’t Need This) Fascist Groove Thang”

Public Enemy – “Fight the Power”

Gil Scott-Heron – “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”

The Buffalo Springfield – “For What It’s Worth”

Malvina Reynolds – “It Isn’t Nice”

Previous posts with related themes:

Gotta Get Down to It

404 Terror

The Edge of Democracy

Battleground

On Mad Kings, Death Cults, and Altman’s Secret Honor

Michael and Me in Trumpland

The Queen of Versailles

In the Seattle Mist with Confederate Dead

Under the Grey Sky

Hacking Hate

Against All Enemies

Martin Eden

The Trial of the Chicago 7

Deja Vu

The U.S. vs. John Lennon

Now We See the Light: A Mixtape

A Trump Era Survival Guide

More reviews at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

An Alternate Universe

He “lifted” all those people from food stamps by cutting their aid and leaving them without food. But sure. He did that.

The big picture: The pinch of high prices for food, energy, housing and more has driven seismic shifts in public opinion over the last four years. Since the onset of the Iran war, the cost of living looks likely to get worse, not better, at least in the near term.

  • Energy prices are surging, interest rates are on the rise, and the stock market is looking wobbly — a triple whammy for U.S. households.

By the numbers: The national average for a gallon of gasoline is poised to surpass $4, up from about $3 a month ago — and is set to rise further the longer the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked.

  • Even before the latest energy shock, electricity prices were up 4.8% over the last year, and piped natural gas up 10.9%.
  • Higher energy prices will also likely show up in more expensive airfares and in shipping costs that could ripple through all sorts of goods.
  • Grocery prices are up 3.9% over the last year, and Iran’s blockade is throttling the global supply of fertilizer, which could create new pressures on food prices come harvest season.

He thinks his happy talk will tide people over until everything turns around because he’s always right about everything. Sure. That’ll happen.

It’s The Republicans, Stupid

New Pew Poll:

Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents overwhelmingly disapprove of Trump’s handling of the conflict (90%) and say the U.S. made the wrong decision in striking Iran (88%).

In contrast, about seven-in-ten Republicans and Republican leaners approve of how Trump is handling the conflict (69%) and think the U.S. made the right decision (71%).

Chart shows About 3 in 10 Americans expect the war in Iran to last a year or more

Still, sizable shares of Republicans take the opposing views.

Republican-leaning independents, in particular, are divided. For instance, roughly half (52%) approve of Trump’s handling of the conflict, while 45% disapprove.

Or is it the stupid Republicans?

Still, they aren’t unanimous, especially among those GOP leaning Indies. They need them to win.

This isn’t really a huge endorsement either…

No wonder Trump says he wants to “move on” from Iran and take on Cuba, which will be much easier — at least in the beginning.

What a mistake.

Update — and then there’s this:

While Trump’s decision to join Israel in attacking Iran has rallied war hawks and his older supporters, it has alienated many of the young men who swung toward the GOP in 2024. That split is resonating among not only the rank-and-file, but also conservative media influencers and some corners of the White House.

The generational divide was on stark display at CPAC, the annual conservative base-rallying gathering, where some young MAGA loyalists expressed deep frustration and even anger at the Trump administration’s choice to reignite conflict in the Middle East. One month into the war, Trump’s shaky ground with young men threatens to fracture an already-fragile GOP coalition ahead of a hostile midterm in November.

At the conference in north Texas, some attendees carried around Iranian flags, pledging loyalty to the U.S. mission overseas, while others donned America First hats and preached about the need for anti-interventionism.

“Trump and Republicans in general are going to have major issues in the midterms, in 2028, if we can’t wrap this up in a relatively quick amount of time,” said 21-year-old Andrew Belcher, president of the Ohio College Republicans. He added that Trump is doing “relatively poorly” with hyper online young men who are influenced heavily by media figures like Tucker Carlson and other isolationists in the GOP.

As I’ve said, I don’t think he really cares much about his base anymore. He’s prefer not to have the Dems win in November but he thinks he can persuade people to believe it was stolen no matter how large the victory. And he’s sure that in the end history will remember this era the way he wants it to so … whatever. Right now he just wants to build his monuments. But the rest of the party has different needs…

QOTD: Nice Little World You Have Here…

“He thinks everything is transactional, he can deal with the deal one step at a time and see how things unfold, but war is fast, uncontrollable, unpredictable and deadly,” said Julian E. Zelizer, a Princeton history professor and the editor of a book of essays about Mr. Trump’s first term.

“He’s doing the same techniques he always does — threatening people, insulting people, seizing attention to what he wants to say — he’s learning that it doesn’t always work,” he added. “He’s doing the art of the deal in a way that’s just creating chaos.”

That’s from this article in the NY Times about Trump’s war. (gift link) It’s actually much too kind but it is interesting. He’s in so far over his head that it’s breaking him.

He loves the violence though. Just loves it:

“We have unparalleled firepower, unlimited ammunition, and plenty of time — Watch what happens to these deranged scumbags today,” he wrote in a Truth Social post this month. “They’ve been killing innocent people all over the world for 47 years, and now I, as the 47th President of the United States of America, am killing them. What a great honor it is to do so!”

And his henchmen love to see it:

“President Trump is acting like a wartime president should — decisive, unafraid to use his constitutional authority and focused on protecting Americans rather than getting bogged down in the kind of endless and rudderless conflicts we saw under his predecessors,” said Mike Davis, who leads the Article III Project, a conservative advocacy group, and was an early supporter of Mr. Trump’s war.

“Presidents don’t need permission to defend the country, and the media and Democrats will do anything to delegitimize Operation Epic Fury,” he said. “President Trump’s legacy won’t be judged on process or polls, but on whether he succeeds in neutralizing the Iran threat and making Americans safer.”

Trump knows what he’s doing is illegal.He says it right up front. But he’s immune from all accountability as long as he has 33 Republican sycophants in the U.S. Senate he won’t be impeached and the law can no longer touch him.

Here’s an interview with an expert you might find interesting:

NATE SWANSON spent nearly two decades in the U.S. government, including most recently as a State Department representative on the Trump administration’s Iran negotiating team and previously as the National Security Council’s director for Iran in the Biden administration. Days before the U.S. bombed Iran, Swanson published a piece predicting that Iran would do exactly what it has done should the U.S. attack.


That’s expertise President DONALD TRUMP had available to him — until Swanson, a BARACK OBAMA holdover, was “forced out” of his post after a critical tweet from conservative podcaster LAURA LOOMER, Swanson said. Loomer did not return comment and a White House official, speaking on background, noted that Swanson did not serve on the National Security Council in the Trump administration.

In his piece for Foreign Affairs published Feb. 24, Swanson wrote that Iran would not capitulate after a bombing campaign, but rather escalate and “target global oil flows and international shipping, sending energy prices up and creating a serious political liability for Trump.” And indeed, Iran has made scattershot attacks on energy targets and others across the region, as well as throttling passage through the Strait of Hormuz by threatening attacks on ships.

In an interview with POLITICO this week, Swanson predicted that the Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran will not go well because both sides are “irrationally confident” in their positions. Neither side seems willing to find an offramp at this point, he said.

“I think the war is probably going to go on longer than anyone anticipated,” he said.

We spoke with Swanson this week about his predictions — and what he thinks comes next in the war with Iran.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Trump keeps saying Iran’s response has surprised him — that no one told him Iran would retaliate against regional energy infrastructure. How does that kind of comment from the president sit with you?

Obviously, it’s not true. There are many people in the government who told him that there was high risk involved. He just chose not to listen to them. And as someone who was forced out of the government and wrote pretty much exactly what was fairly obviously going to happen, that doesn’t sit super well.

What is your current take on the state of the war today?

I think both sides are probably irrationally confident in their standing, and so I think that’s a little worrisome. So I think the war is probably going to go on longer than anyone anticipated.

Trump continues to believe that military success is leading to Iranian political capitulation, which isn’t happening.

Let’s remember that Iran has a vote and Iran is dead set on resisting and defying expectations. I also think they’re kind of irrationally confident without an off-ramp.

I think we’re going to be stuck in this conflict longer and with likely escalations to come. I think the problem is the president is not going to get any off-ramp, and I think we’ll probably go through some of these ground operations he’s considering.

So you’re not convinced by these negotiation talks right now?

One, Iran has rejected them. It’s the same thing that Iran rejected for previous iterations. They’re feeling confident. They feel like they should be making the demands, not the U.S., and obviously the U.S. isn’t adhering to that. So I don’t think either side is ready to compromise.

You negotiated with the Iranians last year, representing the Trump administration posture at the time. What do you think are the most notable changes from either side since then?

On Iran’s side, I think there’s a real hardening coming out of the June war. They didn’t know what to make of Trump before that. I think they have hardened and shown less flexibility. So they haven’t really seriously engaged, it’s more performative than serious. That’s where Iran has shifted a lot since last June.

In the U.S, I think the shift came earlier. And I think they didn’t know what they wanted out of a deal and I think the U.S. became more beholden to our domestic politics on this, and listening to outside influence so no enrichment, etc.

If you were still there at the NSC, what advice would you give to the president today?

You’re not gonna be able to control the off-ramp. Iran is not going to capitulate, so the idea that you’re gonna be able to unilaterally set the off-ramp isn’t going to happen. Either you’re going to have to escalate or you’re going to have to compromise. And so those are just the two options.

Fabulous.

No Emperors Either

He just goes out of his way to be offensive these days:

President Donald Trump is toying with renaming one of the world’s most critical shipping routes after—who else—himself.

Speaking at an investor forum in Miami on Friday night, Trump casually referred to the Strait of Hormuz as the “Strait of Trump,” before quickly correcting himself, then insisting it wasn’t a slip.

“Excuse me, I’m so sorry. Such a terrible mistake,” he told the crowd.

“The Fake News will say, ‘He accidentally said.’ No, there’s no accidents with me.”

The remark drew laughs in the room, but behind the scenes, it’s not entirely a joke.

Trump has reportedly privately floated renaming the waterway the “Strait of America,” or even after himself, if the U.S. succeeds in wresting control of it from Iran, according to The New York Post.

One administration official reportedly told the Post that the U.S. is “taking the Strait back” and suggested that if America ends up policing it, “why should we call it Hormuz?”

This branding of the world with his disgusting name — which should be a name that joins the pantheon of names that no person would ever willingly claim — is the strongest sign of his fundamental personality disorder which is getting worse every day.

Unfortunately, he’s sullying the name of our country right along with his own.

The Real Correction Comes Nov. 3

So Much Winning!

My name is Donald John Trump, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Dow closes in correction, down 10% since a record high in February, as war with Iran roils markets. https://cnn.it/40ZmR3H

CNN (@cnn.com) 2026-03-27T20:28:19.574825087Z

We did it. Dow closes at 45166.64. 10% correction in 6 weeks. Great work all around.

Bill Scher (@billscher.bsky.social) 2026-03-27T20:26:50.503Z

Dow falls into correction as Iran war shakes Wall Street #TheHill

#TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-03-27T21:00:47.000Z

If your portfolio is taking a beating, there’s always the YMCA :

Young man, there’s no need to feel down, I said
Young man, pick yourself off the ground, I said
Young man, ’cause you’re in a new town
There’s no need to be unhappy
Young man, there’s a place you can go, I said
Young man, when you’re short on your dough you can
Stay there and I’m sure you will find
Many ways to have a good time

Cranks, Amateurs, And Fools

Real American heroes

Krash Patel is as big an idiot as you supposed (Reuters):

Iran-linked hackers have ​broken into FBI Director Kash Patel’s personal email inbox, publishing photographs of the director and other documents to the internet, the hackers and ‌the bureau said on Friday.

On their website, the hacker group Handala Hack Team said Patel “will now find his name among the list of successfully hacked victims.” The hackers published a series of personal photographs of Patel sniffing and smoking cigars, riding in an antique convertible, and making a face while taking a picture of himself in the mirror with a ​large bottle of rum.

The emails, Gizmodo reports, come primarily from the 2010s:

The U.S. government had seized Handala’s web domains after the group launched a cyberattack that brought down the systems of U.S. medical equipment company Stryker. The new Handala domain is hosted at a .to address, the top-level domain for Tonga, an island nation in the South Pacific.

More:

“The so-called ‘impenetrable’ systems of the FBI were brought to their knees within hours by our team,” the group wrote. “All personal and confidential information of Kash Patel, including emails, conversations, documents, and even classified files, is now available for public download.”

Rest easy knowing your security is in good hands.

Friday Night Soother

Viral feel good story of the week:

In China, 7 stolen dogs escaped from a butcher’s truck and walked 17 km home led by a corgi! In Jilin province, seven dogs were stolen for sale at a dog meat market and loaded into a van. But they managed to escape — and what followed looks like a movie. Instead of scattering, they stayed together: forming a protective circle around an injured German shepherd, while a corgi led the way. Over two days, they covered about 17 km across roads and fields — and made it back to their owners. Escape mission: accomplished.

This story is unbelievable:

I dove deep into this heartwarming story of seven stolen dogs that escaped and walked 17km home – here are the key verified facts in concise points:

The Theft: Seven dogs from the same village in Jilin Province, China were stolen from their owners. They were loaded onto a truck heading to an illegal dog meat shop.

The Escape: During transport, the dogs jumped or fell from the moving vehicle onto the Changshuang Expressway. Instead of scattering, they stuck together as a tight pack.

The Epic Journey: Over two days they covered around 17 km across highways and fields. A small corgi led from the front, constantly glancing back and adjusting pace to keep everyone together. Larger dogs formed a protective ring around an injured German Shepherd. ‘

The Rescue: Locals and rescuers tracked the group in real time via viral social media posts and drone footage until they safely intercepted the entire pack.

Happy Ending: All seven dogs were reunited with their grateful owners in the same village after vet checks. Only minor injuries despite the fall, traffic, and long trek. These neighbourhood friends already played together daily, which helped them stay united.

This real-life “Homeward Bound” adventure led by one brave little corgi has gone mega-viral for showing incredible loyalty and teamwork.

Dogs really are the best.

Share to spread this wholesome win and celebrate these heroes!

I don’t know about you but I needed that.

Nightmare Fuel

Pro Publica took a look at a new study about what would happen if the MAHA freaks get their way with vaccines:

Before vaccines, death and disability stalked children. Then shots turned once-common infections into something doctors only read about in textbooks. When immunization rates drop, however, plagues from the past can come roaring back, as measles has in American communities where parents decided not to vaccinate their children. Imagine what would happen if even the people who wanted shots couldn’t get them.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who founded an antivaccination group, is considering changes that could prompt the handful of companies that make most shots for American children to stop selling them here. Over the last year, he has been transforming a government that long championed the lifesaving benefits of vaccines into one that questions their safety here and around the world.

Shortly after Kennedy was nominated, questions swirled over how he might overhaul America’s immunization system. Two Stanford University researchers wondered how many people would suffer if vaccination rates dropped or shots became entirely unavailable for four of the most infamous diseases: polio, measles, rubella and diphtheria.

Outbreaks often start when an American catches one of these illnesses abroad and returns home. So epidemiologists Mathew Kiang and Nathan Lo, who is also an infectious diseases doctor, built a model to simulate how the four contagions could spread from sick travelers based on each state’s vaccination rates.

[…]

The professors ran thousands of simulations for each disease, producing a range of possible outcomes. From there, they figured out the average number of deaths and disabilities over a 25-year period.Their model shows that at current vaccination rates, the nation is already teetering on the brink of an explosion in measles cases — one that would be virtually wiped out with just a 5% increase in vaccination. But if current rates drop by half, all four diseases could return.

The researchers’ modeling of the worst-case scenario assumes a quarter century where no one could get the shots. It doesn’t account for the likelihood of parents going abroad to find vaccines or politicians intervening to ensure drugmakers offer them again. But the results demonstrate in stark terms how vital shots are and what’s at stake if policy changes interfere with Americans’ ability to vaccinate their kids.

It’s not good. Without the polio vaccine at least 23,000 kids will be paralyzed, and that’s al low estimate. Without the measles vaccine over 230,000 will be dead over 25 years and 41,000 babies could be born with congenital rubella syndrome. On average, the model predicts 138,000 deaths from diphtheria, could be a million over 25 years. And those are just the worst cases of paralysis and death. The degree of suffering would be a million times worse.

That’s what these unqualified quacks and weirdos want to do to us.

Read the whole thing for the details. It’s terrifying but important. The medial profession has to step up and put themselves on the line to oppose this quackery.