Skip to content

Month: December 2020

Historically unpopular

Oh look, the pathetic loser is just as unpopular as he ever was. Look how cramped and small that line is. Meanwhile, Joe Biden comes in with good will among a majority of Americans:

new Gallup poll finds that President-elect Joe Biden has a 55% favorable rating and a 41% unfavorable rating.The same poll gives President Donald Trump a 42% favorable rating and a 57% unfavorable rating.

What’s the point: The 2020 election was, like almost every election involving an incumbent, mostly about voters’ feelings toward said incumbent. Not enough attention, however, has been paid to the fact that the challenger was a fairly popular guy. He did not allow Trump to make this election a choice of the lesser of two evils.

Indeed, Biden is more popular than Trump has been at any point since he started running for president in June 2015.

A look across all the polling shows that Trump’s favorable rating has usually been in the 30s or 40s, like in the Gallup poll. In the network exit poll, it was 46%.The highest favorable rating I could find in any live interview poll for Trump was after he won the 2016 election. His favorable rating stood at 50% in a Bloomberg News poll conducted by Selzer and Company.

Trump never actually got above 50% in any live interview poll.Biden, by comparison, has done it multiple times. He did it in the CNN/SSRSFox News and New York Times/Siena College polls in October, to name a few.Unlike Trump, Biden’s favorable rating is now usually above his unfavorable rating. The national exit poll pegged him at a 52% favorable rating to 46% unfavorable rating, for example.

Biden’s favorable rating right now looks similar to Barack Obama‘s heading into his second term in 2013.This gives an insight: Biden being more popular than unpopular isn’t abnormal. What was abnormal was that Trump was elected, despite being so unpopular. Perhaps even more unusual is that he could never get above 50% during his presidency, which is unheard of in modern American politics.

It is utterly ridiculous that we are even having to think about this stupid voter fraud fraud, and even worse that the entire Republican Party, except for a few local GOP officials who refuse the pretend they are terrible at their jobs, is going along with it.

He is and has been an unpopular president. There have been others that dipped lower than him. But there has never been one who never had even a moment of majority support during his term. And now he’s lost his re-election because he just couldn’t do it.

Still, we all obsessed by the minority of people who love him because we still can’t believe that so many people could possible like this guy.

But they do:

By the way, most losers either stay the same or gain in favorability after the election, probably because they behave with graciousness and class and people appreciate it. This president is losing in favorability.

This poll was taken in the week after the election. I’d be curious to see what it is today:

They love their Dear Leaders. Until they don’t

One version of conventional wisdom holds that if the Republican establishment had tried harder to control Donald Trump, his supporters might have started to question him and he would have lost his stranglehold on the Republican base. We fondly recall those Republican leaders, led by the right-wing senator and former presidential nominee Barry Goldwater, going up to the White House to tell Richard Nixon it was over, or the Senate’s vote to censure red-baiting Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy, as events that broke the fever and brought their rabid followers back to reality.

As far as Nixon is concerned, I don’t think any of us should be soothed by that example. It was only six years later that the conservative movement that had been turbocharged by Goldwater’s 1964 defeat reached the pinnacle of national power with the election of Ronald Reagan. The fever didn’t break. It got stronger.

And according to an article in the Washington Post by Yale historian Beverly Gage, we might recall McCarthy as the most hated man in America, but he maintained the support of a third of the country even after he was driven out of politics in disgrace. I wrote last week about the GOP’s reluctance to confront McCarthy (and Trump), out of both fear and opportunism. But Gage points out that out of that ignominious defeat, a new generation of right-wing activists was born. And she adds, ominously:

Something similar is likely to happen as Trump departs the Oval Office warning of elite conspiracies and rigged ballots, encouraging his base to see themselves as noble warriors against an illegitimate political order. While the Trump presidency will soon be over, the history of Trumpism is just beginning.

We don’t often hear, she observes, about “the counter narrative that began to build among McCarthy’s grass-roots supporters during those years, in which the sheer volume of criticism aimed at the senator became proof that he was right all along: that the country was, indeed, run by a menacing but elusive liberal-communist conspiracy aimed at taking down right-thinking, God-fearing Americans.”

That certainly sounds familiar. Gage also notes that this began the construction of right-wing institutions that took advantage of the conspiratorial thinking that sprang from that era. Over the years they dropped poor old McCarthy from their list of mentors, replacing him with more respectable names like Goldwater and Reagan. But McCarthyism was the genesis of what came to be defined as the conservative movement.

Gage continues:

Trump’s story of what happened in the 2020 election bears all the hallmarks of McCarthyite myth: conspiring elites, hidden corruption, even the threat of an imminent socialist takeover. And though Trump will no doubt leave office on Jan. 20, that story — and the powerful sense of grievance behind it — is sure to thrive in the years ahead …

Today’s Republican establishment may ultimately repudiate the man who has held it in thrall — and in fear — for four-plus years. But it is Trump’s base, and their interpretation of his ouster from Washington, that will determine the future of Trumpism.

Trump held a rally in Georgia over the weekend, ostensibly to support the two Republican senators campaigning for the runoff election in January and gave his interpretation:

If you wanted a plain and simple definition of Trumpism, McCarthyism or any other version of the conspiracy-addled conservative mindset, there it is. This sense of grievance has been there for many decades now.

I don’t know whether this will have legs, though. Trump’s supporters are up in arms about what they’ve been told is a stolen election. They believe their leader when he tells them that he has proof and that his forces will prevail. It’s hard to predict what they will do when confronted with the hard cold fact that Trump is no longer going to be president. This Tuesday marks the “safe harbor” deadline for the resolution of all electoral disputes, and the members of the Electoral College will cast their votes next Monday, Dec. 14. Trump’s fans may enjoy playing victims, but when it comes to their leaders, they don’t like losers.

As we consider whether Trump will retain his popularity with this base, I would just remind people that we’ve just recently seen a Republican president topple from dizzying heights of popularity that Trump has never come close to seeing. I’m speaking of George W. Bush, who entered the White House having lost the popular vote and won in the Electoral College, thanks to machinations in a state that was governed by his brother, along with an overtly partisan Supreme Court decision. He nonetheless entered office with a 57% approval rating, which soared to 90% after 9/11. Bush soon fell out of favor with Democrats after he launched the Iraq war, but Republicans adored him as fervently as they love Trump.

Bush flew high for years. The mainstream media extolled him as the second coming of Winston Churchill and Abraham Lincoln rolled into one. His cocksure declaration that the terrorists would “hear from us real soon” at the World Trade Center site had pundits swooning as if he had delivered FDR’s “a day that will live in infamy” speech. He was perceived as a cowboy who liked to clear brush on his faux ranch in Texas, but also a guy with a great arm who could “throw a strike” over the plate in the first Yankee game after the terrorist attack. A year or so later, he was seen as a fighter-pilot president who landed on the deck of an aircraft carrier, evoking hours of stomach-churning, sycophantic media coverage. Here’s one of the most egregious examples from that day, a so-called commentary from Chris Matthews:

We’re proud of our president. Americans love having a guy as president, a guy who has a little swagger, who’s physical, who’s not a complicated guy like Clinton. … Women like a guy who’s president. Check it out. The women like this war. I think we like having a hero as our president.

If you think Trump’s rallies are filled with ecstatic followers, you don’t remember the Bush events in 2004 in which he would land on the field on Marine One to the thundering strains of “The Natural” theme. By the way, Bush actually won his re-election campaign, unlike Donald Trump. And guess what happened after that? Within three years, his war was a train wreck, the economy was in free fall and he had bungled the horrific disaster of Hurricane Katrina. Then the global economy imploded and Bush became monumentally unpopular, seeing his approval rating sink as low as 25% by October 2008, just before the election of Barack Obama.

Will Trump’s followers go the way the Bush-loving base once went? I don’t know, but it’s certainly possible. As I said, for all their grievances and feelings of victimization, Republicans don’t like losers. And Donald Trump is most definitely a colossal, historic failure, whose pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise have sealed his legacy as the sorest loser in recent human history.

Unfortunately, whether they call themselves the conservative movement, the Reagan Revolution, proud patriots, the Tea Party, MAGA, Trumpism or something else, that rabid base will still be with us. They love to worship their leaders, but when they get tired of them they toss them out like yesterday’s papers and start looking for the next one. But Wingnut Nation will live on, Trump or no Trump.

An ego too big to fail

On CNN this weekend Ana Cabrera asked former Trump executive Barbara Res how Trump has wiggled his way out of tax issues in the past.

“I don’t know that he has. Actually, he’s been stretching with this out with this so-called order for many, many years. And so who knows what’s going to happen with that. And I think he was stretching it out for a longer time also– you know, even more, because of his lawyers and his accountants.

He had big financial problems in the late 1980s and early ’90s. The way he got out of it was simply the bank thought he was too big to fail, and so they let him get away with things that a person who had a mortgage would never, ever do. The bank let him go ahead and keep a lot of his property and be the active developer on a very big project on the west side because they thought it would be worth more than him getting approvals on it than just selling it at a fire sale. He’s always been very lucky in his life.

We used to say among our crew that, you know, he had a deal with the devil. And even in that, he was lucky in that as they felt they needed to keep him afloat because, believe me, they did not want to. Those banks, oh, boy, they ran like rats from a sinking ship once this was over.”

He is a pain in the neck suing his way out of trouble, causing nothing but headaches, so they let him off the hook. It will be very interesting if they continue to do it. They might. Now he has a bunch of people who make death threats behind him.

How much for a hit off that bota?

Bota bag - Wikipedia

You knew this was coming, right? From Bloomberg:

Water is joining gold, oil and other commodities traded on Wall Street, highlighting worries that the life-sustaining natural resource may become scarce across more of the world.

Farmers, hedge funds and municipalities alike will be able to hedge against — or bet on — potential water scarcity starting this week, when CME Group Inc. launches contracts linked to the $1.1 billion California spot water market. According to Chicago-based CME, the futures will help water users manage risk and better align supply and demand.

If “better align supply and demand” does not make your blood run cold, perhaps it should.

Two billion people now live in nations plagued by water problems, and almost two-thirds of the world could face water shortages in just four years, Tim McCourt, global head of equity index and alternative investment products at CME, said in an interview. “The idea of managing risks associated to water is certainly increased in importance.”

This is a subject that caught my attention years ago when a GOP state representative tried to get control of our local water supply. For privatization, to be sure. Privatization of public assets was happening across the country. First cripple the tax base for maintenance of not-for-profit public assets, then sell off the crumbling assets for a song to the private sector to operate as a monopoly.

“Water access is a fundamental human right no matter where you live,” said Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) in an emailed 2016 statement calling out the World Bank:

“Yes, we’ve just now started shedding light on this local and national issue in the United States, but there are global implications to think about as well,” Moore added, pointing to the World Bank’s investments in private water companies. “It has become clear that there are those in positions of great power who are all too willing to prioritize profits over public safety.”

Charlie Pierce from the same period in commenting on moves by Nestle to control water in Kunkletown, PA:

If there is one element that cannot be turned over to whatever people believe market forces to be, it’s water. It should never be commodified or sold off to make some investor wealthy far from the people who need it. That this ever needs to be argued is a measure of how far we’ve allowed corporate power to change us as a nation.

When Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder’s emergency manager took charge in Detroit in 2014, it was no accident that the first public infrastructure targeted for private operation was its water and sewer system. Financial decisions that poisoned the water supply in Flint had already taken place.  I warned at the time:

They began by shutting off water to thousands of poor residents behind on their bills. Local activist Maureen Taylor told the Netroots Nation conference in July [timestamp 1:08:45], “This monstrous thing that’s going on in Detroit … beyond demonic … You gotta leave here changed! … Water is a human right.”

But with the metastasized capitalism Naomi Klein describes, we’re dealing with people who would sell you the air you breathe if they could control how it gets to your nose. And if you cannot afford to buy their air, well, you should have worked harder, planned better, and saved more.

We’ve learned nothing from Flint, I’m afraid.

Tell them you told them

LRS IT Solutions | Cloud overview - Springfield, Illinois, United States of  America

What’s that old presentation advice? Tell them you are going to tell them, tell them, and tell them you told them? It’s the last bit that trips up Democrats. It was never a problem for Donald Trump. His entire presidency he took credit for things that occurred during Barack Obama’s tenure or even long before.

Plenty of advice has come Joe Biden’s way urging him to “go big” when he assumes the presidency. Biden himself has given signs he wants to do just that when he takes office.

James Downie of the Washington Post urged the once more-cautious Biden to go big in October, reminding Biden that the Obama administration missed its chance to do more to pull the country out of the Bush recession. The COVID-19 recession is not a time to repeat that mistake as Republicans rediscover their faith in balanced budgets. “Others might worry about the bill,” Downie wrote, “but if Biden doesn’t go big, the country will pay the price.”

So will Democrats in 2022.

Gregory Daco of Oxford Economics recommended Biden and proposed Treasury secretary Janet Yellin go big on social services and infrastructure. Given the background of Biden’s team, he may be able to go big if he has control of the Senate or, if not, if he can get help from moderate Republicans in the Senate. (Good luck with that.)

“Biden and Harris must move quickly to go big and to be bold — including using the levers of executive power when Congress will not act,” Rahna Epting, Executive Director of MoveOn advised in The Hill. “People from all walks of life are in pain. Government action is needed, and it is needed now. Business as usual or a return to a pre-Trump ‘normal’ simply will not do.”

Bryce Covert advised last week in the New York Times that if Biden is savvy, he will go big and then brag about it.

Florida may have awarded its electoral votes to Donald Trump, but by 20 points Floridians voted to raise the state’s minimum wage to $15 an hour. “A higher wage, in other words, actually got more votes than either presidential candidate,” she wrote. Two-thirds of Americans support it.

In blue, purple, and red states, voters passed Democratic priorities. Medicaid expansion passed in Idaho, Missouri, Nebraska and Utah. By 80 percent, voters support paid family leave.

The problem is the public does not connect Democratic policy proposals it supports with Democrats, Covert writes. “Which party consistently champions a higher minimum wage? Mr. Biden’s. Which works against it and even has some members who have called for the current minimum to be abolished altogether? The other guys.”

Biden has to tell Americans he is going big, go big, and tell them he went big.

Covert explains:

Mr. Biden can get a jump start without Congress by requiring higher wages and paid family leave at federal contractors, increasing living standards for hundreds of thousands of Americans. But the rest of it will require cooperation from Congress. Should Democrats prevail in Georgia and control the Senate, these should be among the first items on their list, and even if they don’t, they shouldn’t just be dropped in a spasm of premature pessimism.

The president-elect can’t just act, however. He has to tell the public that this is what the Democratic Party stands for. Mr. Biden’s former boss recently made a point he should heed. “In my first couple of years in office, I think I had an unwarranted faith that if we did the right thing and implemented good policies, then people would know,” Barack Obama told NPR’s Michel Martin. “We didn’t sell it hard enough.”

Mr. Biden needs to go bold, especially on Americans’ very real material needs, and he needs to brag about it when he does.

The outgoing president bragged about things he did not even do and MAGA supporters lapped it up. Biden should not emulate Trump’s bald-faced lying, but he should be similarly bold about reminding voters what he’s done for them. He has to tell them he’s going to do it. He has to do it. Then he has to tell them he did it. Loudly.

And when President Joe Biden fails to deliver, he has to tell voters just as loudly who is responsible for stopping him from helping them.

Classless to the end

From Axios:

President Trump is considering a made-for-TV grand finale: a White House departure on Marine One and final Air Force One flight to Florida for a political rally opposite Joe Biden’s inauguration, sources familiar with the discussions tell Axios.

Why it matters: The former network star is privately discussing using his waning powers as commander in chief to order up the exit he wants after dissing Biden by refusing to concede the election, welcome him to the White House or commit to attending his inauguration.

The big picture: The Trump talk could create a split-screen moment: the outgoing president addressing a roaring crowd in an airport hangar while the incoming leader is sworn in before a socially distanced audience outside the Capitol, as NBC News first reported.

1-Immediately announcing he is running for re-election in 2024 would set up four years of Trump playing Biden’s critic-in-chief.

2-The visual also would embody the vast difference in the two leaders’ approaches to the pandemic.

3-And flying off from the South Lawn before landing in Florida would let Trump escape protests, the normal pleasantries of welcoming the incoming president to the White House — and sitting there while Biden takes the oath of office.

Frankly, this is such a petty, lame move on so many levels that it just shows once again that Trump is a classless piece of shit and the only thing you can do is say, “fine.” I’m sure his cult will love it.

The dog whistles are deafening

Josh Marshall caught this little racist “tell” from Trump last night:

Curious how many people caught this reference about people in Georgia who claim “we were here also” and will “take over your farm” under the Democrats.

2/ Confiscations of white farms in southern Africa is a huge topic on the white supremacist right in the US. He’s dog whistling that, saying that slave reparations will mean black folks will be given your farm.

3/ remember this?

4/ Writing for Media Matters, TPM alum @EricKleefeld points out Trump appears to be riffing on a recent episode of Tucker Carlson’s show where he predicts White Farmers in America will soon suffer the same fate as those in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.

https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-and-other-right-wing-media-smear-democratic-senators-bill-address

Originally tweeted by Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) on December 6, 2020.

That Kleefeld article is kind of hair raising:

Fox News host Tucker Carlson and other right-wing media outlets are fearmongering about a bill proposed by three Democratic senators, meant to repair historical discrimination against Black farmers, by saying it would amount to the kind of land seizures and social tumult seen in Zimbabwe under the late President Robert Mugabe.

Carlson previously used his show as a platform for far-right theories about farm violence in South Africa — where farmland is heavily owned by whites, as a legacy of the apartheid system — ultimately inspiring a tweet by President Donald Trump as part of the Fox-Trump feedback loop.

Right-wing media also have a long history of attacking any efforts to address the well-documented history of discrimination by government entities against Black farmers in the United States.

On the November 24 edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight, Carlson singled out the Justice for Black Farmers Act, a bill announced last week by Sens. Cory Booker (D-NJ), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). The bill appears to have gained attention on right-wing site Red Elephants, which said Tuesday that “an American nationalist” reached out to the site “to raise awareness” about the proposal.

The official press release for the bill said that it “will enact policies to end discrimination within the [U.S. Department of Agriculture], protect remaining Black farmers from losing their land, provide land grants to create a new generation of Black farmers and restore the land base that has been lost, and implement systemic reforms to help family farmers across the United States.”

Also to be clear, the bill’s own language makes it clear that land would be purchased from “willing sellers” at fair market value — not the sort of land seizures that were conducted in Zimbabwe during Mugabe’s long presidency.

Carlson issued a dire warning to his viewers — tying the bill to the possibility of Democrats winning the U.S. Senate runoffs in Georgia on January 5.

This stuff is just everywhere now and Trump is going to be even more loose with it than he was as president as hard as that might be to believe. He’ll be completely unleashed. Whether he will be able to draw the kind of crowds he does now is yet to be determined. But you know he’ll up the ante to give them what they want.

And it’s pretty clear what they want …

Update: Here’s a piece from the Washington Post’s media reporter Eric Wemple on Tucker Carlson’s shameless propaganda on this subject.

Rudy comes down with COVID

It was inevitable. Considering how cavalier he has been I’m surprised it took so long. I assume he must be having symptoms because he’s not the type to get tested regularly. And he’s old, drinks a lot, is overweight and has had cancer. I’m sure the president will ensure that he gets all the best treatments and plenty of that oh so stimulating steroid that made him feel like Superman but he’s likely in for a rough illness:

Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, has contracted the coronavirus, the president said Sunday in a tweet.

“.@RudyGiuliani, by far the greatest mayor in the history of NYC, and who has been working tirelessly exposing the most corrupt election (by far!) in the history of the USA, has tested positive for the China Virus,” Trump tweeted Sunday afternoon. “Get better soon Rudy, we will carry on!!!”

Giuliani traveled to states including Michigan and Georgia last week and met indoors with state legislators in an effort to persuade them to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s victory. Videos of the appearances showed Giuliani was not wearing a mask during the meetings.

Hours before Trump’s tweet, Giuliani appeared on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” where he repeated the president’s false claims of election fraud

Giuliani did not respond to a request for comment Sunday afternoon. It was unclear why the president disclosed his condition — or whether he’d asked for Giuliani’s permission.

In the wake of Trump’s election loss, Giuliani has been flying all over the country with the Trump campaign’s senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis, regularly not wearing a mask in public.

When he has been around others who have tested positive, Giuliani has not quarantined, including after a news conference last month at the Republican National Committee’s headquarters when his son tested positive.

Giuliani has shared the president’s skepticism of the virus’s severity and has regularly met closely with others indoors.

Early in the pandemic, he told a Washington Post reporter he was around only six or eight people regularly.

So who’s going to run Trump’s sloppy coup attempt now? Jenna Ellis? She’s barely a lawyer.

This could be interesting.

Also, Rudy is a jackass for exposeing people all over the country. He’s a one man super-spreader. These people …

It’s funny but it isn’t a joke

The Trump campaign stands by Mellissa Carone's wild accusations. (Photo: JEFF KOWALSKY via Getty Images)
The Trump campaign stands by Mellissa Carone’s wild accusations. (Photo: JEFF KOWALSKY via Getty Images)

And, by the way, the woman at the center of this travesty/joke is an actual criminal:

Donald Trump supporter who gave bizarre and discredited testimony about voter fraud in Detroit was recently released from probation after being accused of sending pornographic videos to her fiance’s ex-wife and framing the woman for stealing them, HuffPost has learned.

Mellissa Carone, a contract information technology worker for a voting systems company, made sweeping allegations about mass voter fraud when she testified in hearings before the Michigan Senate and House last week.

She was previously charged under the name Mellissa Wright with first degree obscenity and using a computer to commit a crime. Under a plea agreement, she reduced her charge to disorderly conduct and received 12 months of probation, a spokeswoman for the Wayne County, Michigan, prosecutor’s office told HuffPost. Her probation ended on Sept. 13, just weeks before Election Day, when a temporary staffing agency employed Carone to assist Dominion Voting Systems in Detroit.

But Carone, in an interview with HuffPost on Saturday, claimed that it was actually her fiance, Matthew Stackpoole, who sent the explicit videos to his ex-wife and that she took a plea deal only because they didn’t want to spend any more time in court. Stackpoole also admitted to HuffPost in a text message that he sent the videos and suggested that police officers knew he had done so when officers “took [Carone’s] official ‘confession.’”

“The reason I got charged for it is it was sent off of my phone,” Carone, a self-proclaimed cybersecurity analyst, told HuffPost. “I just said screw it, I’m going to have to take it.”

Carone’s alleged computer crime and false accusations about hacking are directly relevant to her credibility.

The Trump campaign and the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, put Carone forward, presented her as a credible witness and asked state legislators to disenfranchise millions of Michigan voters and declare Trump the winner of Michigan’s electoral votes based in large part on Carone’s claims.

“There is no rule that people coming off probation are incredible as a matter of law,” Giuliani texted HuffPost when asked about Carone’s credibility. “I don’t know her circumstances, but her testimony is corroborated by other witnesses, documentary evidence and expert testimony.” Giuliani also took the opportunity to point out that Hunter Biden used cocaine.

Stackpoole’s ex-wife, the target of the pair’s wrath, provided HuffPost with a prosecutor’s letter naming her as Carone’s victim, and her former attorney corroborated her story. She told HuffPost that the couple had torn her life apart. (HuffPost is not identifying the ex-wife out of concern for the privacy of Stackpoole’s minor son.)

Explicit videos featuring Carone and Stackpoole came from an address with the ex-wife’s maiden name on it, which Stackpoole’s ex-wife believes Carone set up. Stackpoole, according to police records, claimed his ex-wife unlawfully accessed his account, a false allegation that Carone also made.

Carone later denied to police that she sent the videos but then confessed she did send them, adding that she wanted to send her boyfriend’s ex-wife “over the top,” Deadline Detroit reported, based on police records.

Now Carone is telling a much different story, despite what she reportedly told police. Carone admitted in a phone interview that she initially told police she believed her fiance’s ex-wife unlawfully obtained the videos. But she argued that she didn’t make a false allegation at the time because she honestly believed that was the case.

“I didn’t make a false accusation. That is what I thought at the time. That is what I assumed to be the truth at the time,” Carone said. “He had not yet came out and told me that he had sent it.”

Stackpoole told HuffPost in a text message that he sent the explicit videos to his ex-wife.

Nevertheless, Carone insisted that Americans should still believe she told the truth about voter fraud in Detroit. “I’m 100% credible,” Carone said. “I’ve already talked to Trump and Giuliani about this.”

When pressed on her claim that she spoke to the president, Carone revised her story. “I’ve talked directly to Giuliani that has spoken directly to Trump,” Carone said.

Obviously, this woman is a crank. It’s so ridiculous that Saturday Night Live can’t even top the actual testimony for sheer absurdity. But so are all the other “witnesses” Trump and his freakshow legal team have produced. But it doesn’t matter. At least 50 million people are all in on this nonsense.

Keep in mind that we have hundreds of thousands of people dying as they are doing this…

They’re all in on it

This commentary by Jake Tapper is right but it assumes they ever wanted to control it. I think once they realized they could use Trump’s madness to maintain their own personal power, they happily signed on:

Does this guy want to control it? I don’t think so. I think he believes it may help them win the Georgia runoff. And then it will be something else. They’re happy to let him be the object of derision on the other side while they sit back and let the country implode. They are as amoral as he is.

This guy comes a little bit closer to being a normal leader, but still hedges. Trump can file legal challenges for the next four years and lose in every one of them. The idea that these cases must all “play out” is ridiculous. But I’ll give Cassidy credit for at least saying that “whoever loses” should let go of their grievances. I think we know who he’s talking about. But I don’t see much hope of that, at least not for a good long while:

I’m sorry, any lingering hope that the Republican establishment is going to ride to the rescue really needs to be tossed in the garbage. Cassidy obviously knows that Biden won. But he won’t say it outright. I suspect we will have a faction in the congress, in both houses, who will say that Biden is not their president and use it as an excuse to obstruct everything. Not that they need any excuse, but by using his one they will further undermine democracy. I think a whole lot of them have seen that democracy isn’t to their benefit.