Republicans have a real problem when it comes to simple questions about the civil war and slavery. Nikki Haley got caught in a major gaffe yesterday in New Hampshire but Ron DeSantis has a lot of nerve dinging her for it though. He’s the guy who said defended a high school AP curriculum that said slavery helped enslaved Black people develop skills that could be applied for their personal benefit. Please.
Here’s the whole Haley exchange:
This isn’t hard. As Ron Brownstein pointed out, “South Carolina’s 1860 proclamation outlining its reasons for seceding from the Union mentions slavery in its opening sentence & points to the ‘increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery’ as a reason for the state” seceding.”
She tried to clean it up today. First, she said it was a Democratic plant in the audience, as if that would make a difference. And she also said this:
“Of course the Civil War was about slavery … But it was also more than that. It was about the freedoms of every individual. It was about the role of government.”
Hmm. “The freedoms of every individual” in this context would include the freedom of white people to own slaves. “The role of government” would be the role of government to allow the ownership of other human beings. She’s still not willing to speak the simple truth and is instead channeling the old Lost Cause narrative that the civil war was about the “principle” of states’ rights.
Haley should know better. She has a history with this stuff as the Gov. of S. Carolina.
“As she ran for governor in 2010, Haley, in an interview…described the war as between two disparate sides fighting for “tradition” and “change” and said the Confederate flag was “not something that is racist.”
Apparently, the story hit all the airwaves in New Hampshire last night. It wasn’t exactly a confederate state. It illustrates a central problem for the GOP — there are a lot of racists in the party and they demand to be catered to. But if you aren’t Trump (who’s allowed to vomit up anything and people in the party will excuse it) you’d better be able to smoothly dog whistle your way through it in places where Republicans prefer their racism to be more subtle. Haley just failed that test.
“Why Trump’s ‘Kubrick Stare’ mugshot is straight out of the horror film playbook” – via The Telegraph
The man spends (how much?) time, bronzer and hairspray on himself each morning before going to work late. He had to have daily presidential security briefings dumbed down to maps and bullet points because he has a short attention span for anything not Donald Trump. He has other priorities (which don’t include personal hygiene).
But question his star power (or his liquidity) and you have his full attention.
Donald Trump kept the Christmas spirit going strong on Wednesday when he used his Truth Social account to go after the director of Home Alone and Home Alone 2 for suggesting in an interview that he “bullied” his way into a now-iconic cameo in the 1992 sequel.
Just as Trump has frequently accused special prosecutor Jack Smith of having a fake name, the former president suggested the same of Chris Columbus as he disputed the director’s claims about how his appearance during a scene at the Plaza hotel, which he owned at the time, came to be.
“30 years ago (how time flies!), Chris Columbus, and others, were begging me to make a cameo appearance in Home Alone 2,” Trump wrote, claiming he was “very busy” and “didn’t want to do it” but because they were so “persistent” he agreed “and the rest is history!”
Trump focusing on the big issies like the director of Home Alone 2 saying mean things about him. pic.twitter.com/thu2Nh2DYp
Over the holiday weekend, Columbus told Business Insider that the production paid to film in the Plaza lobby, but there was one condition.
“‘The only way you can use the Plaza is if I’m in the movie,’” he recalled Trump saying. “So we agreed to put him in the movie, and when we screened it for the first time the oddest thing happened: People cheered when Trump showed up on-screen. So I said to my editor, ‘Leave him in the movie. It’s a moment for the audience.’ But he did bully his way into the movie.”
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” Trump shot back on Wednesday. “That cameo helped make the movie a success, but if they felt bullied, or didn’t want me, why did they put me in, and keep me there, for over 30 years?”
The idea of removing Trump from the film has come up before, such as just after the Jan. 6 insurrection in 2021 when someone on Twitter proposed a “petition to digitally replace” Trump in Home Alone 2 with 40-year-old Macaulay Culkin, to which the actor replied, “Sold.”
“I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed: I am your retribution,” Trump told CPAC in March.
I’m giving space this morning to the youngest Democratic state chair in the country. One year ago, Anderson Clayton, a 2020 Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, and Amy McGrath field organizer took on “the powers that be” in the N.C. Democratic Party. She ran for state chair at 25. And won. Last night, she looked back on that decision (on the hellsite).
(Full disclosure: I’m a friend and a fan. Clayton consulted with me for 3-1/2 hrs weeks before announcing her run. She did everything I recommended and more, including getting an early start. I funded a chunk of her campaign and watched it unfold as the only supporter over 35 on her campaign Slack.)
I was terrified when we launched. Folks didn’t understand why we wanted to get into the race so early, and everyone I talked to about running told me, “The race is in February. Why are you thinking about it now?” It was December. Because we knew by being the youngest, people…
We sent out mailers(!) that were made possible by donations (!) we got because during call time we didn’t just call folks within the party, we made sure to test my ability to raise money. Because the number one critique we got was that “young folks can’t raise money.” pic.twitter.com/4qVggRGzuj
(Since winning the chair, Clayton has appeared on television, in national newspaper profiles, and raised funds across the country.)
That was when a certain state senator named @MikeWoodard endorsed me in the race. It was a moment of all moments, and it gave the idea and the thought that we could really win this thing to so many folks on the ground. And to me, it was such a brave thing.
I’m hoping that after this year we’ve done just a little bit to prove to folks that it was the right thing to trust a young person with this responsibility.
And that young folks can be some of the most creative, talented, and resourceful places of energy for our party…
I see our party’s future every time I speak to a group of teen Dems, young Dems, or unaffiliated young folks who feel disaffected from our party right now, but know that they’re pro-choice voters, or climate voters, or gun-violence prevention voters. I see it all around.
I know I still have so much to prove next year. I’m celebrating today though, because we took a risk. And it paid off. I hope every young person out there who feels scared or like they shouldn’t run for office, or challenge the status quo – will take this as a sign to do it.
Also PLUG: help a girl with an end of year deadline bc I want my fundraising numbers so strong in January for 2023 that folks can never say again young people can’t raise money! If we work hard, we can! 💪✨🫶 #ncpolhttps://t.co/xAbzz8hrgL
If anyone is going to redeem the global climate and our reeling democracy, it’s not going to be the generations that oversaw bringing the world to this crisis. Fixing what needs fixing is not going to come from a dial-tested three-word slogan or a dead-on-arrival five-point progressive policy. Most political work is not an intellectual exercise or showing out in yet another street protest featuring decades-old chants. It’s grunt work. Endless grunt work. If you’re not prepared for that kind of organizing, stand aside and let those with the passion for it do it. They’re likely 40 years younger.
I have nothing but respect for Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and her career of accomplishments. I still want her to go home and make room for fresh talent to move up. She can take Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Steny Hoyer and Jim Clyburn with her. Their party will be stronger for it.
“It’s not [your, his, her, their] turn” is a party culture (another local tale about beating that here) that has little to do with talent. It wasn’t Barack Obama’s turn in 2008 either, or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s a decade later. The veteran organizers defied that culture and made history. “For everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose under heaven,” says Ecclesiastes. Too many of our leaders don’t know when their season is up. It’s why we have a septuagenarian and an octogenarian running for president in 2024. But here we are. I’m talking about where we go from here.
Want to be a “playah”? Show up willing to do the grunt work. Then keep showing up.
Anderson Clayton is Gen Z. First order of business is a selfie (moments after we first met in person., June 18, 2022).
Where’s change coming from in your state? My friends in their 20s have different sensibilities and cultural touchstones. And a fresher set of skills. So did we at that age. It is the way of things. Get behind the new.
You gotta get yourself together babe Try to keep it cool You wanna make it last forever maybe Get behind the new
Unfortunately, sometimes people have to see the consequences of their actions before it can.
If there’s one issue I’ve sadly become so pessimistic about that I can hardly write about it anymore, it’s guns. The ongoing tragedy of our fetish for the grotesque weapons of war with which so many Americans believe they have a right to play makes me feel like pulling the covers over my head and never coming up for air. I’ve noted the failure of NRA in the last couple of years and they did manage to pass a very tepid gun safety bill in the last congress. But even with that it just seems so hopeless that I’ve lost heart.
But I read a story this morning in the Washington Post that makes me wonder if maybe something might be changing and I’m sharing it with you with a gift link so you can read it too. It’s about four current and three former Senators who have changed their minds. That’s not something I expected to see.
They interviewed these senators who all voted against the bills that were proposed in the wake of the horrific Sandy Hook massacre in 2013. It’s emotionally wrenching to be reminded of that horror and witnessing these Senators confront what they did is quite moving. An excerpt:
It is rare for politicians to shift their viewson policy issues as culturally divisive as gun rights. But the expressions of remorse underscore how the failure to change laws in response to Sandy Hook continues to haunt many who held power at the time — prompting some of them to openly wonder if they allowed short-term political considerations to cloud their judgment on votes that might have saved lives. Obama, addressing Sandy Hook families last year at an event commemorating the 10th anniversary of the shooting, called Congress’s inaction that spring despite his personal lobbying “perhaps the most bitter disappointment of my time in office, the closest I came to being cynical.”
The Democrats have changed, not the Republicans which means that any real change will require the Democrats either winning the White House and the congress with either a filibuster-proof majority or the will to eliminate the filibuster. We’re a long way from that. But this article made me think for the first time in a long time that it might be possible.
Read the whole thing if you have the time. Maybe there is a tiny bit of light at the end of the tunnel?
“It’s my fucking money!” the 2024 Republican presidential frontrunner privately vented in October, referring to an alleged sum in the tens of millions of dollars, a source with direct knowledge of the matter tells Rolling Stone.
Trump wasn’t talking about a business deal. Rather, he’s been grumbling about money donated to a think tank his former staffers and allies founded in 2021 to “advance the America First agenda.”
For several months now, according to three people with knowledge of the situation, the former president has complained to an array of confidants and Republicans about the millions raised by the America First Policy Institute, a MAGAfied think tank launched near the start of his post-presidency. The nonprofit is populated by several former high-ranking Trump administration officials, including Larry Kudlow, Rick Perry, and Linda McMahon, and it’s led by Brooke Rollins, who served as a top White House domestic policy aide to Trump. AFPI is one of several Trump-aligned organizations and think tanks working to craft an intellectual framework for hardline policies, ranging from voter crackdowns to potentially invading Mexico.
In the ex-president’s mind, Rollins was making a “killing” off of his name, sources recount, and was stiffing Trump. “It’s not right,” the former president has groused in recent months.
Letting Trump wet his beak with this money would likely be illegal but needless to say, he doesn’t care about that:
AFPI is a tax-exempt, educational nonprofit and is expressly barred under IRS rules from spending money on elections or donating to a political candidate like Trump. Given that Trump is a candidate for office, paying him personally could be seen as attempting to aid a political campaign. One of the experts pointed out that tax-exempt nonprofitsmust also operate for public benefit, and they cannot disproportionately benefit private individuals or pay them more than fair market value for their services.
The way campaign finance laws work these days for Republicans, I doubt it would be a problem. They could just write a check for the whole thing and the FEC would shrug.
He wants a check:
Trump has stated his belief that this money is held in an account by “Brooke,” and that she can easily transfer it to him, personally, if she wanted to do so. In some of his discussions on the topic, Trump has said that he’s willing to settle for “just half” of the haul, two of the people with knowledge of the matter say. He’s suggested he’ll let Rollins off easy, and “she can keep” the rest of the cash.
The reason they will probably succumb to his demand is that all these people are angling for a job in a prospective Trump administration. So they’ll pay him whatever he wants.
Apparently, he won’t shut up about it. He just keeps demanding it, asking lawyers to get involved and refusing to hear their explanations as to why he shouldn’t do it.
No matter how many times this has been explained to the former (and possibly future) leader of the free world, he apparently refuses to accept the logic. He fires back that the only reason the think tank and other MAGA-friendly groups get so many donations is because of Trump’s name and “my brand,” and therefore, he’s entitled to a substantial cut.
I long since stopped believing this is all just a grift. His severe personality disorders (malignant narcissism, pathological lying etc.,) drive him as much as anything, But greed is certainly a motivator and he will take whatever he can get. It’s in his nature.
What’s even weirder, in my opinion, is the apparent eagerness among regular people to give this self-professed billionaire their hard earned money. But that’s one of the most important pieces of evidence supporting the idea that this is a cult not a political movement. One of any cult leader’s greatest skills is parting his followers from their money. Trump requires it as a personal offering to him as a living god. When they don’t do it, it makes him very angry.
Several years ago, when many Democratic strategists were demanding that the party embrace the tenets of the Christian Right in order to win over the salt of the earth, white, Real Americans (whom they insisted were essential to a legitimate governing majority) the media briefly reported on some of their more extreme rituals. They looked at “purity culture” practices such as gay conversion “therapy”, masturbation abstinence and “purity balls” which feature a pseudo wedding ceremony between a father and daughter.
All these practices were disturbing enough that they pretty much went underground after being publicly exposed and the culture wars turned to their next battlefield, the latest being the cruel bullying of transgender teens and banning of gay literature in schools.
There was something particularly creepy about the purity balls. TIME Magazine reported on one of the balls back in 2012, where girls as young as eight or nine don long white dresses and listen to their fathers “promise ‘before God to cover my daughter as her authority and protection in the areas of purity,’ and to practice fidelity, shun pornography and walk with honor through a culture of chaos and by so doing guide their daughters as well.” He promises to protect her “purity of mind, body, and soul”and the girls are given lockets with a key, which the father keeps until the girl gets married at which point they turn it over to her husband. (I guess chastity belts are hard to find these days.)
After dinner comes the ballet performance, when seven tiny ballerinas in white tulle float in; then seven older dancers carry in a large, heavy wooden cross, which they drape in white, with a crown of thorns. Four of the five Wilson daughters are among the dancers, and they offer a special dance to their father, to the music of Natalie Grant: Your faith, your love And all that you believe Have come to be the strongest part of me And I will always be your baby …
Then Randy and his friend Kevin Moore stand in front of the cross, holding up two large swords, points crossed. Fathers and daughters process beneath the swords to kneel; the girls place a white rose, symbolizing abstinence, at the base of the cross while the fathers offer a quiet blessing.
I don’t know if these purity balls have completely gone out of fashion but you don’t hear about them much anymore. At least not until last week, when this story from ABC showed up in our news feeds:
Years before Mike Johnson would ascend to No. 2 in the presidential line of succession, a German TV news outlet profiled the future speaker of the House and his then-teenage daughter.
“This looks like a wedding,” a news reporter says in German in a 2015 n-tv news segment that was unearthed by ABC News. “But they are not bride and groom — but rather father and … daughter,” the reporter adds, referring to Johnson and his then-13-year-old daughter, Hannah.
According to ABC, the segment shows him nodding along as his daughter Hannah vows “to make a commitment to God, myself, my family, my friends, my future husband, and my future children … to a lifetime of purity, including sexual purity.” That’s quite a pledge to require a 13 year old to take. (Mrs Johnson is shown in the film saying that they don’t even discuss contraception because premarital sex is completely out of the question.)
Is it at all a surprise that Speaker Mike Johnson engaged in this bizarre practice? Of course not. It’s a wonder nobody thought to ask him about it before. After all, he was already on record as a staunch believer in purity culture when he said that he installed so-called accountability software called “Covenant Eyes” on his and his teenage son’s devices so they can catch each other is they ever view pornography. He and his wife have a “covenant marriage” which makes divorce very difficult (and which Johnson tried to make into law when he was in the Louisiana legislature.) He even says God told him he’s Moses chosen to pull Republicans together.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is a fundamentalist with a theocratic agenda that he’s been pursuing for many years. And like so many other Christian nationalist leaders, he’s made common cause with a man one would think a true believer like himself would think was the antichrist. Has the man who forced his little girl to take that purity pledge ever seen this?
Johnson obviously doesn’t care about any of that. He worked with other leaders of the Christian Right to help Trump’s coup attempt in 2020 and raced down to Mar-a-lago the minute he got the speakership to immediately endorse Donald Trump immediately.
As the New Republic pointed out, Johnson has been groomed for power for years by some of the most influential right wing organizations in America, including the secretive Council for National Policy which “journalist Anne Nelson, author of the book on the Council for National Policy, Shadow Network, has described … as ‘the secret hub of the radical right.’ She has also described Johnson as their ‘creation.'” They all, including Mike Johnson, clearly see Donald Trump as a useful tool and nothing more.
Johnson said during a Fox interview, “I am a Bible-believing Christian. Someone asked me today in the media, they said, ‘It’s curious, people are curious: What does Mike Johnson think about any issue under the sun?’ I said, ‘Well, go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my worldview.’” He certainly checks all the boxes, even going so far as the strange rituals of fundamentalist purity culture.
But you know what they say about power corrupting even the most pious of believers. Mike Johnson aligned himself with the most morally corrupt politician to ever run for the presidency and he doesn’t seem in the least bit conflicted by it. Clearly he didn’t take any of his purity pledges seriously at all.
This is a viral pic of DeSantis being interviewed for a podcast. It says it all, doesn’t it? His campaign is falling apart. Any competent advance person should have seen to it that this wouldn’t happen.
And then they went ahead and posted it.
DESANTIS: “I’m going to be a change agent in Washington. I don’t want to be liked in Washington. I don’t care about the media, the bureaucrats, any of that. I want to return this government to We the People.” pic.twitter.com/Jd8gJJvHEX
Cutman Jacob “Stitch” Duran administers treatment to fighter Vladimir Klitschko. Photo via Wkimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0).
Polls we reported on Tuesday suggest that a large swath of maybe-Trump supporters are looking for an excuse to abandon him in 2024. A criminal conviction is what they’re waiting for:
An October Times/Siena poll indicates the conviction gut-punch for Trump would be stronger in swing states, leading to Biden victories in Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania as well as Wisconsin where Biden is already favored. The shift would be “seismic,” with Biden winning by 10 rather than losing by four percentage points.
Democrats are their own worst enemies in this situation. Three years ago on the date the Electoral College met to officially elect Joe Biden president, I posted:
It is never a good bet to think Donald J. Trump won’t stoop that low or lower. But the question Democrats have to answer now both for others and for themselves is what they will do to defeat the New Confederacy that announced itself last week.
To refresh memories, mutliple post-election protests by thousands of Trump supporters resulted in violence. “The events went by several names, including the Million MAGA March, the March for Trump and Stop the Steal DC,” NPR reported in mid-November. More protests erupted weeks later:
By Saturday night, clashes between rallygoers and counterprotesters escalated into violence, with four people stabbed and 33 people arrested into Sunday morning. Nine people were transported to hospitals, according to Washington, D.C.’s Fire and EMS Department. Two of the nine were police officers with injuries that were not life-threatening.
That was just the warmup for Jan. 6.
President Joe Biden’s institutionalist instincts will tell him to let the state and federal court cases involving Trump play out. Hands off. Innocent until proven guilty, etc. Let the juries decide Trump’s fate and those of his accomplices. That’s fine for the incumbent. But Democratic Party operatives should not let it lie. Not now. But fair play is the party’s natural instinct.
Trump’s support is weakening. Now is no time to back off. Waiting for the courts to convict Trump months from now (if ever), or hoping states will ban him from their ballots is political malpractice. Democrats must press their advantage. Right now.
Remind voters at every turn that Trump faces 91 felony counts. His closest associates face charges. Let Republicans complain that, no, Joe Biden is the real fascist. Let Trump whine about how UNFAIR it all is. Donald Trump’s Christmas “MAY THEY ROT IN HELL” messages are insane. Voters — Trump voters — are seeing through him. They just don’t want to admit they’ve been had. Democrats must leverage their unease. Once you’ve cut your oponent over the eye, work the eye. Holding back and waiting for the referee to stop the match is a fool’s game.
How many Rocky movies did Stallone make? And they’re all the same movie. So why do people keep going? Because so many Americans themselves feel like underdogs. We want to root for the little guy with heart. Facing insurmountable odds. Risking it all. We want to feel the thrill up our spines and in the tops of our heads when Bill Conti’s trumpet fanfare introduces the training sequence. We want to hear that. Wait for it. Cheer for it. Pay for it. Over and over and over.
Readers may enjoy an older video making the rounds again from the show “Letters Live.” Contrary to JoJoFromJerz’s description (social media sometimes strips context), the words are not actress Edie Falco’s. She came to read them in 2018.
In the wake of violence in Charlottesville in 2017, a Salt Lake City resident named Jonna Ramey wrote an open letter to white nationalists that was titled, “What Is Wrong With You?” Her letter was published in The Salt Lake Tribune and was soon read by millions. At Letters Live at New York City’s The Town Hall back in 2018, acting legend Edie Falco joined us to read it.
Letter of the week: What is wrong with you, white supremacists?
I am a 67-year-old American white woman. My parents enlisted in World War II to fight fascism. They both served; my mother was a nurse, my father navigated bombers. They lost friends in that bloody war so that all the world could be free of fascism. They did not fight so that some white people could claim supremacy or that Nazis could openly walk the streets of America.
White person to white supremacist person: What is wrong with you?
People of European heritage are doing just fine in the world. They run most of the world’s institutions, hold much of the world’s wealth, replicate as frequently as other humans. You’re not in any danger here. The world is changing, that’s true. Others want a piece of the pie. They work for it, strive for it and earn it. Technology (robotics) is having a greater effect on your job prospects than immigrants. Going forward, tackling corporate control and climate change will need all of our attention, ideas and energy. Put down your Tiki torches and trite flags and get involved in some real work.
By the way, the world won the war against Nazi fascism in the 1940s, just as America won the war against the Confederacy in the 1860s. Aligning with two lost causes just labels you as profound losers.
And finally, white person to white person: Like my parents before me, I will not stand idly by nor give up my rights or the rights of other Americans because you think you are better than some of us. It doesn’t work that way. All Americans stand shoulder to shoulder against your hatred and bigotry.
Jonna Ramey Salt Lake City
So much of the discontent in this country is an expression of inchoate feelings. People lack words to express their profound unease. Or the words they might use open them to ridicule or condemnation, like Charlottesville’s “very fine” Nazis. Donald Trump’s MAGA cult wants America to be “Great Again.” What that means they will not or cannot say. What they don’t say speaks volumes.
People who view society as a zero-sum game find it more socially acceptable to accuse immigrants, for example, of “taking our jobs” or bringing in disease and drugs than to admit out loud what’s really eating at them. Newcomers sharing in America’s freedoms, they believe, means less for them.
It is the prospect of white people sharing political and cultural space in this teetering democracy with people they consider inferiors. Since white people first invaded this continent, they have dominated it and the Black people they imported. That’s the way it was. That’s the way it’s always been. That’s as America’s founders and the bearded white man in the sky intended.
It is Christians seeing their First Amendment religious protections extended to people who believe in a deity other than Jesus or none at all. Religious freedom is all well and good so long as other faiths are not too numerous and noisy about their beliefs. So long as “lesser” faiths agree whose god is The Big G.
It is the icky feeling they experience at seeing LGBTQ+ people emerge from the closets where they belong. Freedom was never meant for them.
It is the gnawing discomfort of Americans who love them some Declaration and Constitution but know deep down they never believed any of that “created equal” stuff; it was always just marketing. As the expression goes, “When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
It is knowing despite all the time spent in Sunday school that they never learned to share.
